Paulo Freire意識覺醒歷程觀的回應—發展學生批判意識的教學方法

A Response to the Perspective of Paulo Freire's Process of Conscientização: Teaching Methods for Developing Students' Critical Consciousness

施宜煌(Yi-Huang Shih)

批判意識 ； 神奇意識 ； 素樸意識 ； 意識覺醒 ； conscientização ； critical consciousness ； magical consciousness ； naiveconsciousness ； Paulo Freire

教育實踐與研究

28卷2期（2015 / 12 / 01）

149 - 180

繁體中文

意識覺醒（conscientização）是Paulo Freire（1921-1997）教育理論的核心觀點，欲瞭解Freire的意識覺醒理念，有必要分析意識覺醒的歷程。然意識覺醒與壓迫二者關係密切，故欲分析意識覺醒歷程前必先瞭解Freire 對壓迫關係的分析，方能契入「壓迫」的真正意涵。Freire對「壓迫」關係的分析，源自G. W. F. Hegel意識辯證論與K. Marx壓迫論的啟示。準此，本文透過哲學的文獻分析與理論詮釋的方式，首先探源Freire分析壓迫關係的源頭；其次，分析Freire 意識覺醒歷程觀，冀盼以此探思為基礎回應發展學生批判意識的教學方法。探思之後，這些教學方法分別為：(1)引導學生意識到我自身是自由的；(2)引導學生意識到意識形態神話的本質；(3)教師必須體認學生是具有意識的個體；(4)師生皆為教學活動的認知主體；(5)教師實踐提問與對話的教學；(6)誘發學生產生反省與行動結合的批判意識。

The idea of conscientização is the core concept in Paulo Freire's theory of education, and in order to understand the idea of conscientização, its process must be first explored. As there is a close relationship between conscientização and oppression, this study explores the analysis of oppression from Freire’s perspective to better understand conscientização. Freire's analysis of oppression is based on Hegel's “dialectic of the lord and bondsman＂ and Marx's ＂analysis of oppression.＂ For this reason, philosophical literature analysis and theoretical hermeneutics analysis are used. This study first analyzes the origin of Freire's analysis of oppression and it next analyzes the process of conscientização. Based on this exploration, teaching methods for developing students' critical consciousness are identified as follows: (1) guide students in the realization of individual freedom, (2) guide students to realize the nature of the ideological myth, (3) recognize that students are individuals with consciousness, (4) understand that teachers and students are all cognitive subjects in teaching activities, (5) teach through problem-posing and dialogue, and (6) develop students' critical consciousness with a combination of reflection and action.

1. 李奉儒(2003)。P. Freire 的批判教學論對於教師實踐教育改革的啟示。教育研究集刊，49(3)，1-30。
   連結：
2. 洪鎌德(2006)。馬克思的經濟思維與其哲學詮釋。哲學論集，38，181-202。
   連結：
3. Cuff, E. C.,Sharrok, W. W.,Francis, D. W.(1998).Perspectives in sociology.New York, NY:Routledge.
4. Elias, J. L.(1994).Paulo Freire: Pedagogue of liberation.Malabar, FL:Krieger.
5. Elias, J. L.,Merriam, S. B.(1995).Philosophical foundations of adult education.Malabar, FL:Krieger.
6. Freire, P.,Barr, R. R.(Trans.)(1994).Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:The Continuum.
7. Freire, P.,Faundez, A.,Coates, T.(Trans.)(1992).Learning to question: A pedagogy of liberation.New York, NY:The Continuum.
8. Freire, P.,Macedo, D.(Trans.)(1985).The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
9. Freire, P.,Macedo, D.(Trans.)(1993).Pedagogy of the city.New York, NY:The Continuum.
10. Freire, P.,Macedo, D.(Trans.),Koike, D.(Trans.),Oliveira, A.(Trans.)(1998).Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
11. Freire, P.,Ramos, M. B.(Trans.)(2000).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:The Continuum.
12. Freire, P.,Ramos, M. B.(Trans.)(1997).Education for critical consciousness.New York, NY:The Continuum.
13. Freire, P.,Wong, P. L.(Trans.)(1998).Politics and education.Los Angeles, CA:University of California.
14. Freire, P.、方永泉譯(2003)。受壓迫者教育學。台北:巨流。
15. Gadotti, M.,Milton, J.(Trans.)(1994).Reading Paulo Freire: His life and work.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
16. Giddens, A.(1982).Sociology: A brief but critical introduction.London, UK:The Macmillan Press.
17. Grabowski, S.M.(Ed.)(1978).Paulo Freire: A revolutionary dilemma for the adult educator.New York, NY:Syracuse University.
18. Hegel, G. W. F.,Miller, A. V.(Trans.)(1977).Phenomenology of the spirit.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
19. Lewis, T. E.(2012).The aesthetics of education: Theatre, curiosity, and politics in the work of Jacques Rancière and Paulo Freire.New York, NY:The Continuum.
20. Luke, C.(Ed.),Gore, J.(Ed.)(1992).Feminisms and critical pedagogy.New York, NY:Routledge.
21. Marx, K.(2001).Capital (Volume1).London, UK:ElecBook.
22. Marx, K.(2001).Capital (Volume3).London, UK:ElecBook.
23. Morrow, P. A.,Torres, C. A.(2002).Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical pedagogy and transformative social change.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
24. Passmore, J.(1980).The philosophy of teaching.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
25. Roberts, P.(2000).Education, literacy, and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire.London, UK:Bergin & Garvey.
26. Shor, I.,Freire, P.(1987).A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
27. Smith, W. A.(1976).The meaning of conscientizacao: The goal of Paulo Freire's pedagogy.Amherst, MA:Center for International Education.
28. Smith, W. A.(Ed.)(1976).The meaning of conscientizacao: The goal of Paulo Freire.Amherst, MA:Center for International Education.
29. Taylor, P. A.(1993).The texts of Paulo Freire.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
30. Torres, C. A.(1994).Education and the archeology of consciousness: Freire and Hegel.Educational Theory,44,429-445.
31. 王秋絨(1990)。台北=Taipei，國臺灣師範大學教育研究所=College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
32. 李錦旭編、王慧蘭編(2006)。批判教育學—臺灣的探索。台北=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychology。
33. 傅偉勳(1999)。西洋哲學史。台北=Taipei:三民書局=San Min。
34. 湯仁燕(2004)。台北=Taipei，國臺灣師範大學教育研究所=College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. (2022)。「隱性」遊走、教學「抗議」：日治時期國民學校台籍教師的意識覺醒與教學實踐。樹德科技大學學報，24(2)，181-196。