臺灣與中國大陸深圳地區大學生學習動機與學習成效發展之比較：以學習模式為中介變項

A Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Learning Motivations and Outcomes of College Students in Taiwan and Shenzhen Region of Mainland China: Learning Modes as Mediators

何希慧(Sophia Shi-Huei Ho)；彭耀平(Yao-Ping Peng)

兩岸大學生 ； 高等教育 ； 學生學習成效 ； 學習動機 ； 學習模式 ； cross-strait college students ； higher education ； learning modes ； learning motivation ； student learning outcome

教育實踐與研究

29卷1期（2016 / 06 / 01）

139 - 171

繁體中文

過往西方研究多以東方文化檢視亞洲地區學生，然而，相同的文化情境卻可能因不同的社會體制，導致教與學結果的差異。本研究試圖從心理動機角度，檢視臺灣與中國大陸學生的學習動機類型，並評估其學習模式與學習成效間關係比較。樣本調查對象以兩岸大學商學院學生為主，研究變數之操作性定義改編自Li 等人（2007）、Nasir 等人（2009）、Philip 等人（2008）、Pike等人（2011）及White 等人（2008）所開發之研究量表，以李克特5 點尺度進行測量，取樣方式採立意抽樣，問卷填答者以樣本學校之二、三、四年級學生為主。臺灣有效問卷數計378 份，中國大陸為273 份，以AMOS 軟體進行結構方程模式（SEM）分析兩群組樣本在研究路徑關係之比較。研究結果顯示，臺灣學生在應用型學習的認知程度高於大陸學生，但在學業認同的認知程度則低於大陸學生。另在路徑分析部分，臺灣學生在角色認同對於探索型及應用型學習的正向影響，及應用型學習對認知獲益與非認知獲益的正向影響皆優於大陸學生。

Previous studies in the relationship of learning motivation and outcome were mostly conducted on research samples in Asia from the perspective of oriental culture; however, under the same cultural background, different social systems might lead to different teaching and learning outcomes. Therefore, this study examines the learning motivation patterns of Taiwan and Mainland China college students from the perspectives on psychological motivation, and investigates the relationship between learning modes and learning outcomes. Adopting judgmental sampling, a total of 651 valid questionnaires were collected from cross-strait business college sophomore, junior, and senior students. The measurement scales were developed by Li et al. (2007), Nasir et al. (2009), Philip et al. (2008), Pike et al. (2011), White et al. (2008), and all measures were 5-point Likert-type scales. The path relationship of the two groups was examined through structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS. The results showed that exploitative learning was perceived as more effective by the college students in Taiwan as compared to those in Mainland China. In terms of academic identity, the contrary is the case. However, in path analysis, Taiwanese students were superior to Chinese students in regard to the positive influence of role identity on exploitative and explorative learning and the positive influence of exploitative learning on cognitive and non-cognitive gains.

1. 李仁豪、余民寧(2014)。臺灣中老年人外向性及神經質人格，社會支持與主觀幸福感關係之模型建構及其結構係數比較。教育心理學報，45(4)，455-474。
   連結：
2. 陳羿君(2012)。兩岸大學生對教師教學領導能力認知之比較分析。教育心理學報，43(4)，763-782。
   連結：
3. 陳舜文、魏嘉瑩(2013)。大學生學習動機之「雙因素模式」：學業認同與角色認同之功能。中華心理學刊，55(1)，41-55。
   連結：
4. 內政部統計處（2014）。內政統計年報。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm [Department of Statistics in Ministry of the Interior (2014). Statistical yearbook of interior. Retrieved from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm.]
5. Abes, E. S.,Jones, S. R.,McEwen, M. K.(2007).Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities.Journal of College Student Development,48(1),1-22.
6. Anctil, T. M.,Ishikawa, M. E.,Scott, A. T.(2008).Academic identity development through self-determination successful college students with learning disabilities.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,31(3),164-174.
7. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411.
8. Brackney, B. E.,Karabenick, S. A.(1995).Psychopathology and academic performance: The role of motivation and learning strategies.Journal of Counseling Psychology,42(4),456.
9. Campbell, C. M.,Cabrera, A. F.(2014).Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related?.Research in Higher Education,55(5),494-507.
10. Capron, L.(1999).The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions.Strategic Management Journal,20,987-1018.
11. Chang, L.,Mak, M. C.,Li, T.,Wu, B. P.,Chen, B. B.,Lu, H. J.(2011).Cultural adaptations to environmental variability: An evolutionary account of East-West differences.Educational Psychology Review,23(1),99-129.
12. Chavez, M. M.(2007).The orientation of learner language use in peer work: Teacher role, learner role and individual identity.Language Teaching Research,11(2),161-188.
13. Chen, S. -W.,Wang, H. -H.,Wei, C. -F.,Fwu, B. -J.,Hwang, K. -K.(2009).Taiwanese students' self-attributions for two types of achievement goals.The Journal of Social Psychology,149(2),179-194.
14. Choi, B. K.,Rhee, B. S.(2014).The influences of student engagement, institutional mission, and cooperative learning climate on the generic competency development of Korean undergraduate students.Higher Education,67(1),1-18.
15. Cole, M. S.,Feild, H. S.,Harris, S. G.(2004).Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students' reactions to a management class.Academy of Management Learning & Education,3(1),64-85.
16. Corbett, A. C.(2005).Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,29(4),473-491.
17. D'Ailly, H.(2003).Children's autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(1),84.
18. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2002).Handbook of self-determination research.Rochester, NY:University Rochester Press.
19. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York, NY:Plenum.
20. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2000).The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry,11(4),227-268.
21. Duff, A.,Boyle, E.,Dunleavy, K.,Ferguson, J.(2004).The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance.Personality and Individual Differences,36(8),1907-1920.
22. Ford, J.(Ed.)(1997).Improving training effectiveness in work organizations.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),382-388.
24. Guay, F.,Ratelle, C. F.,Chanal, J.(2008).Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education.Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne,49(3),233.
25. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Sadder River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
26. Hau, K. T.,Marsh, H. W.(2004).The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non‐normal data and small sample sizes.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,57(2),327-351.
27. Hmelo-Silver, C. E.,Duncan, R. G.,Chinn, C. A.(2007).Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).Educational Psychologist,42(2),99-107.
28. Hummel, E.,Randler, C.(2012).Living animals in the classroom: A meta-analysis on learning outcome and a treatment-control study focusing on knowledge and motivation.Journal of Science Education and Technology,21(1),95-105.
29. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Hillsdale, NJ:Scientific Software International Inc.
30. Kolb, D. A.(1984).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
31. Krause, K. L.,Coates, H.(2008).Students' engagement in first‐year university.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(5),493-505.
32. Leunhart, S. (Ed.)(1982).Sociological methodology.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
33. Li, T.,Greenberg, B. A.,Nicholls, J.(2007).Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBA marketing curriculum.Journal of Marketing Education,29(1),25-33.
34. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32(1),53-76.
35. Little, T. D.,Cunningham, W. A.,Shahar, G.(2002).To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),151-173.
36. Llorens, S.,Schaufeli, W.,Bakker, A.,Salanova, M.(2007).Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?.Computers in Human Behavior,23(1),825-841.
37. Marginson, S.(2011).Higher education and public good.Higher Education Quarterly,65(4),411-433.
38. Maringe, F.,Sing, N.(2014).Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: Pedagogical, quality and equity issues.Higher Education,67(6),761-782.
39. Maruyama, G. M.(1998).Basics of structural equation modeling.Thousand Oasks, CA:Sage.
40. Nasir, N. S.,McLaughlin, M. W.,Jones, A.(2009).What does it mean to be African American? Constructions of race and academic identity in an urban public high school.American Educational Research Journal,46(1),73-114.
41. Nespor, J.(1987).The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies,19(4),317-328.
42. Nisbett, R. E.,Peng, K.,Choi, I.,Norenzayan, A.(2001).Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.Psychological Review,108(2),291-310.
43. Oleson, A.,Hora, M. T.(2014).Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices.Higher Education,68(1),29-45.
44. Petersen, I. h.,Louw, J.,Dumont, K.(2009).Adjustment to university and academic performance among disadvantaged students in South Africa.Educational Psychology,29(1),99-115.
45. Philip, C. T.,Unruh, K. P.,Lachman, N.,Pawlina, W.(2008).An explorative learning approach to teaching clinical anatomy using student generated content.Anatomical Sciences Education,1(3),106-110.
46. Pike, G. R.,Kuh, G. D.,McCormick, A. C.,Ethington, C. A.,Smart, J. C.(2011).If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement and students' learning outcomes.Research in Higher Education,52(1),81-106.
47. Pike, G. R.,Smart, J. C.,Ethington, C. A.(2012).The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland's theory.Research in Higher Education,53(5),550-575.
48. Pike, G. R.,Smart, J. C.,Kuh, G. D.,Hayek, J. C.(2006).Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter?.Research in Higher Education,47(7),847-872.
49. Preacher, K. J.,Hayes, A. F.(2004).SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36(4),717-731.
50. Regan, J. A.(2012).The role obligations of students and lecturers in higher education.Journal of Philosophy of Education,46(1),14-24.
51. Reveles, J. M.,Brown, B. A.(2008).Contextual shifting: Teachers emphasizing students' academic identity to promote scientific literacy.Science Education,92(6),1015-1041.
52. Shin, J. C.,Harman, G.(2009).New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives.Asia Pacific Education Review,10(1),1-13.
53. Shrout, P. E.,Bolger, N.(2002).Mediation in experimental and non experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods,7(4),422-445.
54. Simon, R. W.(1997).The meanings individuals attach to role identities and their implications for mental health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,38(3),256-274.
55. Slater, S. F.,Olson, E. M.,Hult, G. T. M.(2006).The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship.Strategic Management Journal,27(12),1221-1231.
56. Stryker, S.(1987).Identity theory: developments and extensions.Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives,London, UK:
57. Tagg, J.(2003).The learning paradigm college.Bolton, MA:Anker Publishing.
58. Tella, A.(2007).The impact of motivation on student's academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,3(2),149-156.
59. Thomas, E.(2007).Student engagement and learning in a community-based arts classroom.The Teachers College Record,109(3),770-796.
60. Tsang, E. W.(2002).Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning‐by‐doing and learning myopia.Strategic Management Journal,23(9),835-854.
61. Vallerand, R. J.,Fortier, M. S.,Guay, F.(1997).Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72(5),1161.
62. Volman, M.,ten Dam, G.(2007).Learning and the development of social identities in the subjects care and technology.British Educational Research Journal,33(6),845-866.
63. Wentzel, K. R.(1998).Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(2),202.
64. White, K. M.,Thomas, I.,Johnston, K. L.,Hyde, M. K.(2008).Predicting attendance at peer-assisted study sessions for statistics: Role identity and the theory of planned behavior.The Journal of Social Psychology,148(4),473-492.
65. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),68-81.
66. Yorke, M.,Knight, P.(2004).Self‐theories: Some implications for teaching and learning in higher education.Studies in Higher Education,29(1),25-37.
67. Zepke, N.,Leach, L.(2010).Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action.Active Learning in Higher Education,11(3),167-177.

1. 陳柏霖,洪兆祥,余民寧(2019)。僑生與本地生的目標設定、全心學習、意志力及巔峰幸福之模型建構和其差異比較。教育科學研究期刊，64(2)，131-160。
2. 李宜致,吳偉立(2019).THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MENTAL HEALTH LITERACY, PERSONALITY, AND WELL-BEING IN TAIWANESE YOUTHS.Journal of Data Analysis,14(5),27-38.
3. 彭耀平、陳榮政、何希慧(2018)。大學生學習模式與學習成效間關聯之研究：深度取向學習投入為中介變項。課程與教學，21(1)，133-158。
4. 田光祐(2021)。從ARCS模式探討「軍事倫理學」提升軍校學生學習動機及學習成效。通識學刊：理念與實務，9(1)，95-141。
5. (2016)。課程分級分流實施成效間之研究─以臺灣北區某私立大學為例。教育行政與評鑑學刊，20，27-49。
6. (2017)。自我決定理論觀點下新生未來時間觀與學習投入的關係。教育與心理研究，40(4)，1-28。
7. (2018)。從自我決定觀點探討經濟弱勢大學生學習動機與學習成效關係之研究─以學習模式為中介變數。教育與心理研究，41(1)，61-91。
8. (2018)。大學生學習動機、學習情緒及心流體驗對於學習成就影響之研究。中正教育研究，17(2)，30-41。
9. (2018)。以全心學習為中介角色：僑生與本地生的生活目標與品味之關係。教育與心理研究，41(2)，29-58。
10. (2023)。探討觀光休閒領域學生線上學習疲乏對學習參與度之影響。休閒與遊憩研究，13(1)，46-68。
11. (2024)。大學雙語課程的學生學習經驗—以國立中山大學為例。當代教育研究季刊，32(3)，35-39+41。
12. (2024)。喚起臺灣新世代年輕人學習動機及其喜歡的教學方法之調查研究。教育科學研究期刊，69(3)，197-226。