國民小學校長重建領導層面及能力指標建構之研究：複合多評準決策的應用

The Construction of Dimensions and Competency Indicators of Elementary School Principals’ Turnaround Leadership: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model

賴志峰(Chih-Feng Lai)

校長領導 ； 重建領導 ； 複合多評準決策 ； hybrid MCDM ； principal leadership ； turnaround leadership

教育實踐與研究

31卷1期（2018 / 06 / 01）

71 - 111

繁體中文

本研究旨在建構國民小學校長重建領導層面及能力指標、影響關係與權重體系。本研究分為三個階段：在第一階段，依文獻探討研擬各層面及能力指標，邀請10位專家檢測專家效度，然後透過分層隨機抽樣，抽取515位國小校長進行問卷調查，回收371份有效問卷。運用SPSS、AMOS軟體，進行項目分析及驗證性因素分析，確認各層面及能力指標；在第二階段，邀請14位國小校長及學者專家，進行準則問卷調查，運用DEMATEL建立各層面與能力指標之因果結構關係圖；在第三階段，運用DANP建構各項能力指標之影響關係與權重體系。本研究發現：(1)國小校長重建領導包含四個層面及20項指標，具有信效度；(2)四個層面及指標之間存在依存關係，彼此相互影響；(3)四個層面依其重要性，分別為驅動結果、問題解決、個人效能以及影響結果。最後，依據研究結果，提出具體建議，以供教育決策、領導實踐及研究之參考。

This study aims to construct the dimensions of elementary school principals' turnaround leadership and related competency indicators, the relationships of effects and weight system. It includes three stages. During the first stage, the dimensions and indicators of elementary school principals' turnaround leadership were developed based on literature review, and validated by ten experts. Then, stratified random sampling was conducted; 515 elementary school principals were invited to fill out the questionnaire, and among which 371 valid questionnaires were obtained. By using SPSS and AMOS, item analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted. During the second stage, 14 elementary school principals, scholars and experts were invited to fill out the expert questionnaire. By using DEMATEL, INRM of dimensions and indicators were created. During the third stage, by using DANP, the relationships of effects among indicators and weight system were established. The findings of this study indicated that: 1) there are four dimensions and 20 indicators of elementary school principals' turnaround leadership; 2) there is an interdependent relationship between the four dimensions and 20 indicators and they influence each other; 3) the four dimensions are driving results, problem solving, personal effectiveness, and influencing results in the order of importance. Finally, specific suggestions were offered for educational decision-making, leadership practice, and future research.

1. 張世璿、丁一顧(2016)。國民小學教師領導核心能力指標建構之研究。清華教育學報，33(1)，1-38。
   連結：
2. 賴志峰(2012)。都市大型國民小學重建領導經驗之個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，8(3)，41-70。
   連結：
3. American Institutes for Research(2015).Recruit, select, and support: Turnaround leader competences.Chapel Hill, NC:Public Impact.
4. Ansell, D.(2004).Improving schools facing challenging circumstances.Nottingham, UK:National College for School Leadership.
5. Barker, B.(2011).Auckland, New Zealand,Unitec Institute of Technology.
6. Beddington, J.,Cooper, C. L.,Field, J.,Goswami, U.,Huppert, F. A.,Jenkins, R.,Thomas, S. M.(2008).The mental wealth of nations.Nature,455,1057-1060.
7. Bollen, K. A.(Ed.),Long, J. S.(Ed.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Newsbury Park, CA:Sage.
8. Boyle, A. (2007). Compassionate intervention: Helping failing schools to turn around. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.org/secretariat/files/April30CompassionateIntervention.pdf
9. Bush, T.(Ed.),Bell, L.(Ed.),Middlewood, D.(Ed.)(2010).The principles of educational leadership and management.London, UK:Sage.
10. Calkins, A.,Guenther, W.,Belfiore, G.,Lash, D.(2007).,未出版
11. Colvin, R. L.(2007).Beyond buzz: Leadership is moving to the heart of school reform.Education leadership: A bridge to school reform,Washington, DC:
12. Duke, D. L.(2008).Keys to sustaining successful school turnarounds.Charlottesville, VA:Public Impact.
13. Fontela, E.,Gabus, A.(1976).The DEMATEL observer.Geneva, Switzerland:Battelle Memorial Institute Geneva Research Center.
14. Fullan, M.(2006).Turnaround leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Gabus, A.,Fontela, E.(1972).World problem, an invitation to further though within the framework of DEMATEL.Geneva, Switzerland:Battelle Memorial Institute Geneva Research Center.
16. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
17. Huang, K. -W.,Huang, J. -H.,Tzeng, G. -H.(2016).New hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for improving competence sets: Enhancing a company's core competitiveness.Sustainability,8(2),175-200.
18. Johnson, S.(2011).Turning schools around.Principal Leadership,11(5),40-43.
19. Kettinger, W. T.,Lee, C. -C.(1994).Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information service function.Decision Science,25(6),737-766.
20. Kowal, J., Hassel, E., & Hassel, B. (2009). Successful school turnarounds: Seven steps for district leaders. Retrieved from http://www.centerforcsri.org/files/CenterIssueBriefSept09.pdf
21. Kuan, M. -J.,Hsiang, C. -C.,Tzeng, G. -H.(2012).Probing the innovative quality system structure model for NPD Process based on combining DANP with MCDM model.International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control,8(8),5745-5762.
22. Kutash, J.,Nico, E.,Gorin, E.,Rahmatullah, S.,Tallant, K.(2010).The School turnaround: Field guide.Boston, MA:FSG Social Impact Advisors.
23. Kutash, J.,Nico, E.,Gorin, E.,Tallant, K.,Rahmatullah, S.(2010).School turnaround: A brief overview of the landscape and key issues.Boston, MA:FSG Social Impact Advisors.
24. Learning Point Associates. (2005). Turnarounds with new leaders and staff. Retireved from http://www.centerforcsri.org/pubs/restructuring/KnowledgeIssues4Turnaround.pdf
25. Leithwood, K.(2010).,Alberta, CA:College of Alberta School Superintendents.
26. Leithwood, K.,Harris, A.,Strauss, T.(2010).Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
27. Leithwood, K.,Strauss, T.(2008).Turnaround schools and the leadership they require.Toronto, Canada:Canada Education Association.
28. Liu, C. -H.,Tzeng, G. -H.,Lee, M. -H.(2012).Improving tourism policy implementation: The use of hybrid MCDM models.Tourism Management,33,413-426.
29. Lu, I. -Y.,Kuo, T.,Lin, T. -S.,Tzeng, G. -H.,Huang, S. -L.(2016).Multicriteria decision analysis to develop effective sustainable development strategies for enhancing competitive advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD industry in Taiwan.Sustainability,8(7),646-676.
30. Marsh, H. W.,Hocevar, D.(1985).Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups.Psychological Bulletin,97(3),562-582.
31. Moos, L.(Ed.),Johansson, O.(Ed.),Day, C.(Ed.)(2011).How school principals sustain success over time.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Springer.
32. Opricovic, S.(1998).Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems.Belgrade, Serbia:Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb.
33. Pourahmad, A.,Hosseini, A.,Banaitis, A.,Nasiri, H.,Banaitienė, N.,Tzeng, G. -H.(2015).Combination of fuzzy-AHP and DEMATEL-ANP with GIS in a new hybrid MCDM model used for the selection of the best space for leisure in a blighted urban site.Technological and Economic Development of Economy,21(5),773-796.
34. Public Impact(2008).Elements of school turnaround leadership development programs.Washington, DC:The Center on Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
35. Reza, K.,Vassilis, S. M.(1988).Delphi hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process.European Journal of Operational Research,137,347-354.
36. Rhim, L. M.,Kowal, J. M.,Hassel, B. C.,Hassel, E. A.(2007).School turnarounds: A review of the cross-sector evidence on dramatic organizational improvement.Chapel Hill, NC:Public Impact for the Center on Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
37. Saaty, T. L.(1996).Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process.Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publications.
38. Schmidt-Davis, J.(2010).Turnaround high school principals: Recruit, prepare and power leaders of change.Atlanta, GA:Southern Regional Education Board.
39. Segars, A. H.,Grover, V.(1993).Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis.Management Information Systems Quarterly,17(4),517-525.
40. Shen, K. -Y.,Tzeng, G. -H.(2015).A decision rule-based soft computing model for supporting financial performance improvement of the banking industry.Soft Computing,19(4),859-874.
41. Slatter, S.,Lovett, D.,Barlow, L.(2006).Leading corporate turnarounds: How to fix troubled companies.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
42. Snowden, D. A.(2012).Ohio, Ohio,The Ohio State University.
43. Steiner, L. M.,Hassel, E. A.,Hassel, B.(2008).School turnaround leaders: Competencies for success.Chapel Hill, NC:Public Impact.
44. The Strengths Foundation. (2010). 3 tips for recognising transformational, turnaround and transactional leadership. Retrieved from http://www.thestrengthsfoundation.org/3-tips-for-recognising-transformational-turnaround-and-transactional-leadership
45. Torkzadeh, G.,Koufteros, X.,Pflughoeft, K.(2003).Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy.Structural Equation Modeling,10(2),263-275.
46. Tzeng, G. -H.,Chiang, C. -H.,Li, C. -W.(2007).Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL.Expert Systems with Applications,32,1028-1044.
47. Tzeng, G. -H.,Huang, J. -J.(2011).Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications.New York, NY:Taylor & Francis.
48. Tzeng, G. -H.,Shen, K. -Y.(2017).New concepts and trends of hybrid multiple criteria decision making.Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
49. Welch, O. M.(Ed.)(2012).Turnaround leadership: Deans of color as change agents.New York, NY:Peter Lang Publishing.
50. Young, J.(2014).The one-year school turnaround: Overcoming school improvement barriers using common sense solutions.Jacksonville, FL:Turnaround Solutions Publishing.
51. Zavadsky, H.(2012).School turnarounds: The essential role of districts.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Education Press.
52. 呂金燮、黃慈(2006)。人類學習與認知。新北=New Taipei:國立空中大學=National Open University。
53. 張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。台北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
54. 楊振昇、林松柏(2012)。中、小學校長領導核心能力建構之研究。教育行政研究，2(2)，43-77。
55. 賴協志、吳清山(2016)。國民小學教師知識領導指標建構之研究。教育政策論壇，19(1)，139-176。

1. (2018)。國小校長重建領導之經驗分析。教育研究月刊，293，100-117。
2. (2023)。國民小學校長信任領導層面及指標之建構。教育理論與實踐學刊，48，27-64。
3. (2024)。初任校長推動國際教育之微觀政治素養分析。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，17(1)，101-130。