人工智慧的實踐：對話式日語學習智慧家教系統進行日語補救教學之研究

Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Conversation-Based Intelligent Tutoring System Conducts Research on Japanese Remedial Teaching

賈志琳(Chih-Ling Chia)；李政軒(Cheng-Hsuan Li)

JF Standard日語學習評量指標 ； 知識地圖 ； 智慧家教系統 ； 電腦輔助教學 ； Computer-Assisted Teaching ； ITS ； Knowledge Map ； JF Standard

教育實踐與研究

33卷2期（2020 / 12 / 01）

1 - 41

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的是為日語學習者建立以對話為主的智慧家教系統CITS-JL，以期提升臺灣學生在日語學習中的學習效果。本研究以JF Standard日語學習標準為基礎，提出了初級日語學習的知識結構地圖，根據此知識地圖，臺灣學生可以按照22個學習場景以及86個設計的學習單元逐步學習日語。在這項研究中，CITS-JL首先診斷學生的錯誤模式，然後導入適當的認知失衡教學策略來設計對應的問題和對話，藉以釐清學生在學習上可能存在的語詞誤用。此外，CITS-JL考慮了學習系統、研究目標、研究現況這3個向度內容，讓智慧家教系統發展出更豐富的層次，也能夠更完整的協助學生學習與老師教學。根據研究結果表示，CITS-JL可以立即釐清學生的語詞誤用、培養自學的習慣、藉由反覆練習以提高學習效率。此外，此系統可以應用於個人化學習，學生可以在教室外隨時隨地學習日語，可以節省更多的時間和金錢。本研究的貢獻，不僅是為日語學習者建立一個學習工具，而且為教師提供了適當的指導方法。

The objective of this study is to construct a conversation-based intelligent tutoring system for Japanese learning (CITS-JL), and it is expected to improve students' Japanese learning effects. Based on the Japanese learning standards in the Japanese Foundation Standard, this study proposes a knowledge map for primary Japanese learning; students can learn Japanese step-by-step by following 22 learning scenarios and 86 designed learning units. CITS-JL first diagnosed students' error patterns and then used appropriate cognitive conflict teaching strategies to design corresponding problems and conversations to clarify possible misuse of words in learning. In addition, CITS-JL considers the learning system, research objectives, research status of three orientation content, so that the intelligent tutoring system develop a richer level, but also to more complete to assist students to learn. The results show that CITS-JL can immediately clarify the misuse of students' words, cultivate self-study habits, and improve learning efficiency through repeated exercises. In addition, CITS-JL can be applied to personalized learning. Students can learn Japanese anywhere outside the classroom, saving more time and money. This study contributes to research by building a learning tool for Japanese learners, providing teachers with appropriate guidelines for remedial teaching.

1. 張原誠, Y. -C.,蕭佳純, C. -C.(2016)。學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力：教師創造力教學有效嗎？。教育實踐與研究，29(2)，65-104。
   連結：
2. 陳偉仁, W. -R.,黃楷茹, K. -J.,吳青陵, C. -L.,呂金燮, C. -H.(2018)。專業學習的建構：「設計本位學習」創新教學之行動探究。教育實踐與研究，31(2)，25-57。
   連結：
3. 劉鎮寧, J. -N.(2020)。國民小學校長與教師領導者的協作教學領導個案研究。教育實踐與研究，33(1)，33-69。
   連結：
4. (2001).Cognition & Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress.
5. Anthony, A. M.,Nelson, K. L.(1992).The Nihongo Tutorial System an intelligent tutoring system for technical Japanese language instruction.CALICO Journal,9(3),5-25.
6. Bloom, B. S.(1984).The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring.Educational Researcher,13,4-16.
7. Brants, L.,Struyven, K.(2009).Literature review of online remedial education: A European perspective.Industry and Higher Education,23(4),269-275.
8. Cai, Z.,Graesser, A. C.,Hu, X.(2015).Design recommendations for intelligent tutoring systems.Authoring Tools and Expert Modeling Techniques,3,199-210.
9. Canfield, W.(2001).ALEKS: A web-based intelligent tutoring system.Mathematics and Computer Education,35(2),152.
10. Choi, I. C.(2016).Efficacy of an ICALL tutoring system and process-oriented corrective feedback.Computer Assisted Language Learning,29(2),334-364.
11. Culp, K.,Hawkins, J.,Honey, M.(1999).Review paper on educational technology research and development.New York, NY:Education Development Center.
12. Graesser, A. C.(2011).Learning, thinking, and emoting with discourse technologies.American Psychologist,66(8),746.
13. Graesser, A. C.,Forsyth, C. M.,Lehman, B. A.(2017).Two heads may be better than one: Learning from computer agents in conversational trialogues.Teachers College Record,119,1-20.
14. Graesser, A. C.,Penumatsa, P.,Ventura, M.,Cai, Z.,Hu, X.(2007).Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning through mixed initiative dialogue in natural language.Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis,13,243-262.
15. Graesser, A. C.,Person, N.,Harter, D.,Tutoring Research Group(2001).Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,12(3),257-279.
16. Han, J.(2012).Emerging technologies: Robot assisted language learning.Language Learning & Technology,16(3),1-9.
17. Heift, T.(2010).Developing an intelligent language tutor.CALICO Journal,27(3),443-459.
18. Heift, T.(2016).Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring: Revisited.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,26(1),489-503.
19. Heift, T.(2002).Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers and adamants.CALICO,19(3),295-313.
20. Horton, P. B.,McConney, A. A.,Woods, A. L.,Barry, K.,Krout, H. L.,Doyle, B. K.(1993).A content analysis of research published in the journal of research in science teaching from 1985 through 1989.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(8),857-869.
21. Kang, Y. S.,Maciejewski, A. A.(2000).A student model of technical Japanese reading proficiency for an intelligent tutoring system.CALICO Journal,18(1),9-40.
22. Katushemererwe, F.,Nerbonne, J.(2015).Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in support of (re-)learning native languages: The case of runyakitara.Computer Assisted Language Learning,28(2),112-129.
23. Kausar, T.,Choudhry, B. N.,Gujjar, A. A.(2008).A comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction (CAI) versus class room lecture (CRL) for computer science at ICS level.Turkish Online Journal of Educational TechnologyTOJET,7(4),19-28.
24. Khasawneh, A. A.(1994).An intelligent CAI project for teaching mathematical concepts.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,25(3),325-332.
25. Kuo, B. C.,Hu, X.(2019).Intelligent learning environments.Educational Psychology,39(10),1195-1198.
26. Lambacher, S.(1999).A CALL tool for improving second language acquisition of English consonants by Japanese learners.Computer Assisted Language Learning,12(2),137-156.
27. Luetke‐Stahlman, B.(1988).The benefit of using CAI with a six year old hearing impaired boy learning previously unknown vocabulary and spelling words.Early Child Development and Care,32(1),45-52.
28. Maciejewski, A. A.,Kang, Y. -S.(1994).A student model of katakana reading proficiency for a Japanese language intelligent tutoring system.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,24(9),1347-1357.
29. Moore, B. M.(1988).Achievement in basic math skills for low performing students: A study of teachers’ effect and CAI.The Journal of Experimental Education,57(1),38-44.
30. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
31. Piaget, J.(1970).Science of education and the psychology of the child.SAGE Journals,30(1),56-65.
32. Roth, W. M.,Roychoudhury, A.(1994).Physics students’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning.Journal of research in Science Teaching,31(1),5-30.
33. Stepp-Greany, J.(2002).Student perceptions on language learning in atechnological environment: Implications for the new millennium.Language Learning & Technology,6(1),165-180.
34. Teo, H. H.,Wei, K. K.(2001).Effective use of computer aided instruction in secondary schools: A causal model of institutional factors and teachers’ roles.Journal of Educational Computing Research,25(4),385-415.
35. Yang, Y. F.(2010).Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction.Computers & Education,55(3),1193-1201.
36. 工藤節子, S.,上條純惠, S.,內田櫻, R.,芝田沙代子, S.,長谷川理惠, R.,周欣佳, X -J.,羅曉勤, X -Q.(2015).日語 A2、B1 級的教材教法.台北=Taipei:致良出版社=Zhi Liang Book Co., Ltd..
37. 工藤節子, S.,上條純惠, S.,內田櫻, S.,周欣佳, X, -J.,荒井智子, T.,許均瑞, J. -R.,蘇子翔, Z -X.(2014).日語 A1、A2 級的教材教法.台北=Taipei:致良出版社=Zhi Liang Book Co., Ltd..
38. 日本 3A 網路公司=Japan 3A Network Corporation(2018).大家的日本語（初級Ⅰ）.台北=Taipei:大新書局=Da Xin Book Co., Ltd..
39. 日本国際交流基金会（2010）。日本語教育（語言）。取自 https://www.jpf.go.jp/j/ [The Japan Foundation. (2010). Japanese Education (Language). Retrieved from The Japan Foundation Web site: https://www.jpf.go.jp/j/]
40. 林偉文, W. -W.(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育－以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊，100，53-74。
41. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域－第二外國語文。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/23/pta_18521_6265663_59836.pdf [Ministry of Education. (2018). Twelve Years of National Basic Education Curriculum outline national secondary schools and general higher secondary schools language field - second language. Retrieved from Ministry of Education Web site: https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/23/pta_18521_6265663_59836.pdf]
42. 教育部（2019）。教育統計。取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Education_Statistics/108/108edu.pdf [Ministry of Education. (2019). Education statistics. Retrieved from Ministry of Education Web site: http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Education_Statistics/108/108edu.pdf]
43. 塩澤真季、石司えり、島田徳子(2010)。言語能力の熟達度を表す Can-do 記述の分析－JF Can-do 作成のためのガイドライン策定に向けて－。国際交流基金日本語教育紀要，6，23-39。

1. 賴錦雀(2023)。学習者の振り返りから見るDX時代における日本語教育とAI翻訳機。台灣日語教育學報，40，91-119。
2. 游欣容,郭伯臣,吳慧(2021)。雙代理人和單代理人之對話式智慧家教系統於數學學習成效與學習興趣之探究。測驗學刊，68(2)，101-139。