基於混合多評準決策模式之都市與鄉村旅遊目的地競爭力分析

Competitiveness analysis of rural and urban tourist destinations based on the hybrid MCDM techniques

林家立(Chia-Li Lin)

觀光城鄉 ； 城鄉願景 ； 城鄉競爭力 ； 旅遊目的地發展 ； 決策試驗與實驗評估法(DEMATEL) ； Tourist city and countryside ； Rural and urban vision ； Rural and urban competitiveness ； Tourist destination development ； DEMATEL

觀光旅遊研究學刊

10卷2期（2015 / 12 / 01）

1 - 27

繁體中文

近年來城市與鄉村地區發展更融入觀光的元素，以居民與遊客的雙重思維重塑城鄉新風貌，因此本研究欲探究城市與鄉村地區發展的驅動力與瞭解目前城市與鄉村地區發展的現況，讓城市與鄉村地區發展的利益關係者(居民、遊客、旅居者與政府)能夠有機會重新審視城鄉的未來發展方向以及透過都市與鄉村旅遊目的地的發展重新找回城鄉新價值，本研究以文化保存、環境維持、經濟發展與社會意識之四個面向來建構都市與鄉村旅遊目的地之發展策略圖，運用混合多評準決策分析(Hybrid Multiple CriteriaDecision Making, Hybrid MCDM)技術來進行城市與鄉村地區發展驅動力探究，該模式首先運用決策試驗與實驗評估法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory,DEMATEL)來建構都市與鄉村旅遊目的地之網路關聯圖(Network Relation Map, NRM)，其次運用主成份分析方法(Principal Component Analysis, PCA)將準則依其屬性加以分類，接著再利用層級網路模式(Analytic Network Process, ANP)來找出準則之間的權重關係，並進一步運用VIKOR(Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje)方法來找出各個都市與鄉村旅遊目的地的優勢競爭力，本研究並以台灣南部幾個重要的都市與鄉村旅遊目的地來進行分析。透過研究結果可以找出各都市與鄉村旅遊目的地的競爭優勢，並藉由網路關聯圖分析來進一步擬定其城市與鄉村地區發展策略。希望藉由本研究可以提供城市與鄉村地區發展的利益關係者找出城鄉特色及協助找出自身都市與鄉村旅遊目的地的發展方向，成為下一波觀光城市與鄉村地區發展的新亮點。

The development of town and country increases more and more tourism elements recent years and integrates the viewpoints of residents and visitors to remodel the new style and features, this study tries to explore driving forces for the development of town and country. So that the stakeholders (residents, tourists, sojourners and government) will have the opportunity to re-examine the future for the development of tourist town and country and to rediscover new value oriented by the tourist urban and rural development. This study defines the evaluation system of driving forces (Cultural preservation, Environment sustentation, Economic development and Social consciousness) for tourist town and country based on the hybrid MCDM techniques and the DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) is used to construct the Network Relationship Map (NRM) and the extended NRM. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied to categorize criteria based on their properties. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is used to determine the weights of the components and the VIKOR (Vlse kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) is adopted to determine the competitive advantages. In this study, some tourist towns and tourist countries in southern Taiwan such as Tainan city, Kaohsiung city and Pingtung county were analyzed. Research findings are helpful for authorities understand the tourist competitive advantage for each location and draw up the urban and rural development strategies based on NRM (Network relation map). This study also proposes some new viewpoints to help stakeholders identify their features in tourism development and draw up new tourist highlights for new generation tourist urban and rural development.

1. Al Haija, A. A.(2011).Jordan: Tourism and conflict with local communities.Habitat International,35(1),93-100.
2. Amit-Cohen, I.(2005).Synergy between urban planning, conservation of the cultural built heritage and functional changes in the old urban center - the case of Tel Aviv.Land Use Policy,22(4),291-300.
3. Bennett, N.,Lemelin, R. H.,Koster, R.,Budke, I.(2012).A capital assets framework for appraising and building capacity for tourism development in aboriginal protected area gateway communities.Tourism Management,33(4),752-766.
4. Buzinde, C. N.,Santos, C. A.(2008).Representations of slavery.Annals of Tourism Research,35(2),469-488.
5. Chen, F.-H.,Hsu, T.-S.,Tzeng, G.-H.(2011).A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP.International Journal of Hospitality Management,30(4),908-932.
6. Cheung, S. C. H.(1999).The meanings of a heritage trail in Hong Kong.Annals of Tourism Research,26(3),570-588.
7. Coria, J.,Calfucura, E.(2012).Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly.Ecological Economics,73,47-55.
8. Goovaerts, P.,Van Biesbroeck, H.,Van Tilt, T.(2014).Measuring the Effect and Efficiency of City Marketing.Procedia Economics and Finance,12,191-198.
9. Gulsrud, N. M.,Gooding, S.,Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C.(2013).Green space branding in Denmark in an era of neoliberal governance.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,12(3),330-337.
10. Hori, S.,Shimizu, Y.(1999).Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems.Control Engineering Practice,7(11),1413-1419.
11. Jeng, D. J.-F.,Tzeng, G.-H.(2012).Social influence on the use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique.Computers & Industrial Engineering,62(3),819-828.
12. Lin, C. L.,Hsieh, M. S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2010).Evaluating vehicle telematics system by using a novel MCDM techniques with dependence and feedback.Expert Systems with Applications,37(10),6723-6736.
13. Liou, J. J. H.,Tzeng, G. H.(2007).A non-additive model for evaluating airline service quality.Journal of Air Transport Management,13(3),131-138.
14. Liou, J. J. H.,Tzeng, G. H.,Chang, H. C.(2007).Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model.Journal of Air Transport Management,13(4),243-249.
15. Luque-Martínez, T.,Del Barrio-García, S.,Ibáñez-Zapata, J. ,Rodríguez Molina, M. Á(2007).Modeling a city’s image: The case of Granada.Cities,24(5),335-352.
16. Newsome, D.,Dowling, R.,Leung, Y.-F.(2012).The nature and management of geotourism: A case study of two established iconic geotourism destinations.Tourism Management Perspectives,2–3,19-27.
17. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2004).Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.European Journal of Operational Research,156(2),445-455.
18. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2002).Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction.Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,17(3),211-220.
19. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2003).Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model.International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,11(5),635-652.
20. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2007).Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods.European Journal of Operational Research,178(2),514-529.
21. Ou Yang, Y.-P.,Shieh, H.-M.,Tzeng, G.-H.(2012).A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment.Information Sciences,232,482-500.
22. Pagliara, F.,La Pietra, A.,Gomez, J.,Manuel Vassallo, J.(2015).High Speed Rail and the tourism market: Evidence from the Madrid case study.Transport Policy,37,187-194.
23. Rehan, R. M.(2014).Urban branding as an effective sustainability tool in urban development.HBRC Journal,10(2),222-230.
24. Saaty, T. L.(2006).Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes.European Journal of Operational Research,168(2),557-570.
25. Seyed-Hosseini, S.,Safaei, N.,Asgharpour, M.(2006).Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,91(8),872-881.
26. Shen, Y.-C.,Lin, G. T. R.,Tzeng, G.-H.(2011).Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection.Expert Systems with Applications,38(3),1468-1481.
27. Shyur, H. J.(2006).COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP.Applied Mathematics and Computation,177(1),251-259.
28. Shyur, H. J.,Shih, H. S.(2006).A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,44(7),749-761.
29. Tzeng, G. H.,Chiang, C. H.,Li, C. W.(2007).Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL.Expert Systems with Applications,32(4),1028-1044.
30. Tzeng, G.-H.,Lin, C.-W.,Opricovic, S.(2005).Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation.Energy Policy,33(11),1373-1383.
31. Tzeng, G.-H.,Teng, M.-H.,Chen, J.-J.,Opricovic, S.(2002).Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei.International Journal of Hospitality Management,21(2),171-187.
32. Tzeng, G.-H.,Tsaur, S.-H.,Laiw, Y.-D.,Opricovic, S.(2002).Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei: public preferences and improvement strategies.Journal of Environmental Management,65(2),109-120.
33. Vanolo, A.(2008).The image of the creative city: Some reflections on urban branding in Turin.Cities,25(6),370-382.
34. Wang, Y.-L.,Tzeng, G.-H.(2012).Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods.Expert Systems with Applications,39(5),5600-5615.
35. Wu, W. W.,Lee, Y. T.(2007).Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method.Expert Systems with Applications,32(2),499-507.
36. Yu, P. L.(1973).A class of solutions for group decision problems.Management Science (pre-1986),19(8),936-946.
37. Yusoff, N. A. H.,Noor, A. M.,Ghazali, R.(2014).City Skyline Conservation: Sustaining the Premier Image of Kuala Lumpur.Procedia Environmental Sciences,20,583-592.
38. Zavattaro, S. M.,Daspit, J. J.,Adams, F. G.(2015).Assessing managerial methods for evaluating place brand equity: A qualitative investigation.Tourism Management,47,11-21.
39. Zeleny, M.(1982).Multiple Criteria Decision Making.New York:McGraw-Hill.
40. Zheng, J.(2013).Creating urban images through global flows: Hong Kong real estate developers in Shanghai’s urban redevelopment.City, Culture and Society,4(2),65-76.
41. Zhou, L.,Wang, T.(2014).Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China.Cities,37,27-32.