以政策德菲法建構健保政策評估指標之研究

The Application of Policy Dephi Method in Constructing Evaluation Indicators of National Health Insurance Policy

10.30174/JSS.200906.0004

劉宜君(I-Chun Liu)；傅立葉(Li-Yeh Fu)

永續發展 ； 全民健康保險 ； 政策評估 ； 評估指標 ； National Health Insurance ； Policy Evaluation ； Evaluation Indicators ； Policy Dephi Method

國家與社會

6期（2009 / 06 / 01）

103 - 163

繁體中文

健保開辦十餘年，向來以全世界最低廉、造福的病患最多，政府也自豪是全球最成功的社會保險制度。但健保開辦以來，在改革措施無法順利執行之下，使健保朝向不永續的途徑發展。惟政府與社會大眾均不願見到健保不永續的發展。本研究認爲此一矛盾現象產生的原因，除了健保政策定位的問題外，也在於健保的永續發展評估機制未獲得普遍的共識。本研究除透過文獻探討檢視健保評估的相關研究，並透過調查專家意見建立健保評估機制。研究發現專家們對於本研究提出的評估構面與其部分指標形成高度或中度共識。其中對於「公平性」、「普及性」、「可近性」、「可付性」、「效能性」、「課責性」構面具有高度共識；對於「效率性」、「完整性」與「適足性」構面具有中度共識。此外，專家有共識的健保永續評估指標相當多元，例如「不同地區民眾的健保納保率」、「不同職業民眾的健保納保率」、「健保醫療支出佔全國醫療保健支出之比例」、「國民健康平均餘命」等，印證永續發展不僅牽涉環境資源領域，亦涉及經濟生產、資源分配、消費等社會經濟制度之變革。

In Taiwan, the national health insurance policy has been implemented for more than one decade. Although this policy seems as one of the most successful social insurance services all over the world that our government takes great pride in, failure to implement reform measures successfully has geared the development away from sustainable development. This study believes the casue of this contradictory phenomenon is attributed to the positioning of health insureance policies and the failure to obtain general consensues of the evaluation mechanism of health insurance policies. Different from previous studies that only focuss on single or specific academic approaches such as discussion on fairness, financial design, political feasibility, etc., this study integrates studies from the aspects of mecial care management, public health, finance, administration, economics and social welfare. With this as a foundation, this study investigates the multifaceted indicator of health care evaluation empirically. In addition, this study explores the relevant evaluation indicators of health care research, as well as collects experts' views of sustainable health care evaluation mechanisms by Policy Delphi. The study finds that the Policy Delphi experts reach a consensus of assessment indicators to a high or medium degree. Among them, they have reached a high degree of consensus on ”faireness”, ”distribution”, ”accessibility”, ”affordability”, ”perfor106 mance” and ”accountability”; and a medium degree of consensue on the aspects of ”effectiveness”, ”integrity” and ”appopriateness”. The health care sustainability indicators that expert have consensus on are very diversfied, for example, ” the health care insured rate of different regions,” ”the health care insured rate of different occupations” ”the percentage of medical expenditures for health care insurance to that of national health care expenditures”, ” average life expectancy”, etc. Thus the evaluation of health insurance performance is not only related to environmetal resources but also the reform of socialeconomic system such as economic production, allocation of resources, consumption, etc.

1. 江東亮(2002)。臺灣醫療保健支出之趨勢分析。臺灣衛誌，21，157-163。
   連結：
2. 吳宛蕙、楊長興(2007)。全民健保對健康差距之影響－以平均餘命爲測量。台灣公共衛生雜誌，26(3)，196-207。
   連結：
3. American College of Physicians(2008).Achieving a High-Performance Health Care System with Universal Access: What the United States Can Learn from Other Countries?.Annals of Internal Medicine,148(1),55-75.
4. Bauer R. A.(1966).Social Indicators.Cambridge, Mass.:The M.I.T. Press.
5. Beech, I. B.(2001).The Delphi Approach: Recent Applications in Health Care.Nurse Researcher,8(4),38-47.
6. Bowles, J. N.(1999).The Delphi Technique.Nursing Standard,13(3),32-36.
7. Donaldson, C.,K. Gerard(1993).Economics of Health Care Financing: the Visible Hand.New York:St. Martin's Press.
8. Dow, William H.,Kammi K. Schmeer(2003).Health Insurance and Child Mortality in Costa Rica.Social Science & Medicine,57(6),975-986.
9. Hanratty, Barbara,Tuohong Zhang,Margaret Whitehead(2007).How Close Have Universal Health Systems Come to Achieving Equity in Use of Curative Services? A Systematic Review Equity and Health.International Journal of Health Service,37(1),89-109.
10. Hsaio, W. C.,C. I. Yaung,J. R. Lu(1990).Health Care Financing and Delivery in the ROC: Current Conditions and Future Challenges.Industry of Free China,73(2),13-38.
11. The Efficiency of Universal Health Care
12. Lu, Jui-Fen Rachel,William C. Hsiao(2003).Does Universal Health Imsurance make health Care Unaffordable? Lessons From Taiwan.Health Affairs,22(3),77-88.
13. MacRae, Duncan(1985).Policy Indicators: Links Between Social Science and Public Debate.Chapel Hill, N.C.:University Press of North Caorlina.
14. Patton, M. Q.(1997).Utilization-Focused Evaluation.Thousand Oaks:SAGE.
15. Phelps, C. E.(2002).Health Economics.New York, N.Y.:Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc.
16. Preker A. S.,S. Nitagyarumphong,A. Mills (ed.)(1998).Achieving Universal Coverage of Health Care.Bangkok:Mistry of Public Health.
17. Van Doorslaer(eds.),E. A. Wagstaff(eds.),F. Rutten (eds.)(1993).Equity in the Finance and Delivery of Health Care: An International Perspective.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Van Doorslaer, E.(2000).Equity in the Delivery of Health Care in Europe and the U.S..Journal of Health Economics,19(3),553-583.
19. Wagstaff, Adam,Eddy Van Doorslaer(1992).Equity in the Finance of Health Care: Some International Comparisons.Journal of Health Economics,11(4),361-387.
20. Wen, Chi Pang,Shan Pou Tsai,Wen-Shen Isabella Chung(2008).Evaluation of National Health Insurance's 10-Year Experience in Taiwan.Annals Of Internal Medicine,148(4),258-267.
21. World Health Organization(2000).Health Systems: Improving Performance, The World Health Report 2000.Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization.
22. 健全財務　健保永續經營
23. 勞動者電子報(2005/12/30)
24. 江東亮(2006)。醫療窮人不再有。台北:臺大出版中心。
25. 台灣經濟永續成長會議背景說明會
26. 李允傑、丘昌泰(2003)。政策執行與評估。台北:元照。
27. 林雨靜(2000)。目前全民健保下的主流民意。中央日報(2000/12/29)。
28. 家庭醫師整合性照護制度計畫?：?陳建仁：落實家醫轉診制度有助健保永續經營
29. 陳恆鈞(1998)。社會指標在政策分析應用之困難。東海學報，39(5)，51-72。
30. 家庭醫師整合性照護制度計畫：陳建仁：落實家醫轉診制度有助健保永續經營
31. 傅立葉(2006)。全民健保滿意度之各階層民眾態度分析。中央健康保險局委託研究計畫：計畫編號DOH95-NH-1021。
32. 黃俊英(1996)。企業研究方法。台北:東華書局。
33. 楊志良(2003)。健康保險。台北:巨流。
34. 葉俊榮(2003)。永續臺灣向前指詹氏出版社。台北:詹氏出版社。
35. 董鈺琪(2005)。全民健保民意調查未來改進方式之研究。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫：計畫編號DOH94-HI-1005。
36. 改革是為了走更遠更長的路（五）欣迎二代健保
37. 盧瑞芬(2004)。亞太地區國家醫療財務、醫療照護體系及民眾健康狀態的公平性探討。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫：計畫編號DOH93-PL-1001。
38. 盧瑞芬(2002)。亞太地區國家醫療財務、醫療照護體系及民眾健康狀態的公平性探討。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫：計畫編號DOH91-PL-1003。
39. 蕭慶倫(2005)。全民健康保險成本效益依國際化標準之評估計畫。中央健康保險局委託研究計畫：計畫編號DOH92-NH-1001。

1. 陳琇惠(2013)。建構國民年金保險監理指標之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，17(2)，109-156。
2. 廖明鈺,游美貴(2021)。建構保護性社會工作實務督導指標之初探研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，25(1)，1-48。
3. 劉宜君(2009)。從民眾觀點建立健保政策績效指標：「重要性—績效分析法」之應用。社會政策與社會工作學刊，13(2)，143-186。
4. 劉宜君(2011)。菁英與民眾對於政策意見之一致性研究：健保政策評估指標之案例分析。臺大社會工作學刊，24，1-37。
5. 蘇孔志、黃汎如、陳麗光、陳敦源(2017)。民眾公平性觀感與滿意度關聯性之研究—以台灣全民健保政策為例。國家與社會，19，91-159。
6. (2013)。以CEDAW內涵與防治困境建構家暴與性侵害網絡檢視指標。社區發展季刊，142，13-24。
7. (2019)。中國人口老齡化的現狀、挑戰與對策思考。二十一世紀，174，17-32。