從實踐角度檢討台灣的永續消費政策：以「節能減碳」運動為例

A Practice-Based Approach to Examine Sustainable Consumption Policies in Taiwan: The Case of 'Energy-Saving, Carbon-Deduction' Movement

10.30174/JSS.201112.0003

王淑美(Su-Mei Wang)

永續消費 ； 全球暖化 ； 生活型態 ； 實踐理論 ； 性別不平等 ； Sustainable consumption ； everyday life ； practice theory ； global warming ； gender inequality

國家與社會

11期（2011 / 12 / 01）

107 - 158

繁體中文

在國際推廣永續消費以對抗全球暖化的潮流下，台灣政府自2008年起也積極推動類似性質的「節能減碳」運動，呼籲國民負擔起減緩暖化的責任，並從徹底改變生活習慣做起。然而此類要求人們改變生活型態的永續消費政策，經常被批評過度簡化消費的意涵，忽視日常習慣與生活型態的複雜性，也因此難有成效。另一方面，女性主義學者也提出，永續消費政策督促家戶單位負起資源回收、回歸永續生活型態，卻未納入實際操持家務的女性觀點，相關政策除了不切實際，還加重主婦的負擔。為了探討政府與國際組織推動永續消費抗暖化的政策，是否過度簡化社會的複雜性與輕忽日常生活的深層意義，本文從實踐觀點出發，檢討台灣近年熱烈進行的「節能減碳」運動。藉由採用民族誌學式訪談取得實證資料，希望呈現在人們日常行動的細微考量與可能有的相互牽制，瞭解此類政策的可行性。本文並特別探討對女性生活的影響，期待藉此督促政策制訂者從更多元的角度來反思，以推行更務實適切的建議。

In the context of climate change, governments and international organizations often promote a 'sustainable lifestyle'. However, this approach has been criticized for underestimating the complexity of everyday life and therefore makes little sense to the consumers. In addition, procedures to promote sustainable consumption seldom incorporate house workers' opinions and often cause the increase of women's housework loads.This article employs a practice based approach to examine the 'Energy-saving, Carbon deduction' movement-a series of sustainable consumption policies that have been advocated by the Taiwanese government since 2008. The goal of the movement was to encourage an eco-friendly lifestyle. On the basis of empirical data collected by ethnographic interviews, this article explores how and why people have limited autonomy in changing lifestyles. Furthermore, it argues that existing policies unexpectedly increase women's burdens and cause further gender inequality.

1. 行政院經濟部，2008，節能減碳獎勵及輔導辦法。取自行政院環保署網頁http://ecolife.epa.gov.tw/cooler/default.aspx，取用日期：2011年5月19日。
2. 高雄縣政府主計處，2009，高雄縣97年統計年報。取自http://paymaster.kscg.gov.tw/style/front001/bexfront.php?sid=1484928302，取用日期：2011年6月7日。
3. 行政院環境保護署，2008，全民二氧化碳減量生活小撇步。取自http://ecolife.epa.gov.tw/_userinfo/Cooler/Download/，取用日期：2011年8月26日
4. 行政院主計處，2008，家庭主要設備普及率。取自行政院主計處網頁http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/doc/result/97/all/Year23.doc，取用日期：2011年5月19日。
5. 行政院節能減碳推動會，2008，節能減碳計畫總架構。取自行政院節能會網頁http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/Download/Policy/Reduce CO2Emis-sion/files/節能減碳總計畫架構.pdf，取用日期：2010年6月8日。
6. 行政院經濟部，2008，節能減碳獎勵及輔導辦法。取自行政院環保署網頁http://ecolife.epa.gov.tw/_userinfo/Cooler/Download/02/5.節能減碳獎勵及輔導辦法.doc，取用日期2010年6月3日。
7. United Nations Environment Programme, 2008a, "The Marrakech Process." http://esa.un.org/marrakechprocess/about.shtml(Retrieved: April 29, 2010)
8. (1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for the sociology of education..
9. 中華民國總統府，2008，總統偕同副總統出席「總統府全體同仁簽署節能減碳宣言」活動。取自總統府網頁http://www.president.gov.tw/De-fault.aspx?tabid=131&itemid=13828&rmid=514&sd=2008/06/05&ed=2008/06/05，取用日期：2011年3月16日。
10. 行政院環境保護署，2008，節能減碳無悔措施全民行動方案。取自http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/，取用日期：2010年6月3 日。
11. Bourdieu, P.(1977).Outline of a Theory of Practice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. Bourdieu, P.,Nice, R.(Trans.)(2001).Masculine Domination.Cambridge:Polity.
13. Bourdieu, P.,Nice, R.(Trans.)(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Cohen, M. J.(ed.),Murphy, J.(ed.)(2001).Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences.New York:Pergamon.
15. Cohen, M.(ed.),Murphy, J.(ed.)(2001).Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences.Oxford:Elsevier Science Ltd.
16. Dankelman, I.(2002).Climate Change: Learning from Gender Analysis and Women's Experiences of Organising for Sustainable Development.Gender and Development,10(2),21-29.
17. Giddens, A.(1984).The Constitution of Society.Cambridge:Polity.
18. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and Self-Identity.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
19. Gray, A.(2003).Research Practice for Cultural Studies: Ethnographic Methods and Lived Cultures.London, UK:Sage.
20. Gronow, J.(ed.),Warde, A.(ed.)(2001).Ordinary Consumption.London:Routledge.
21. Hobson, K.(2002).Competing Discourses of Sustainable Consumption: Does the 'Rationalisation of Lifestyles' Makek Sense?.Environmental Politics,11(2),95-120.
22. Jackson, T.(2005).Live Better by Consuming Less?: Is There a "Double Dividend" in Sustainable Consumption?.Journal of Industrial Ecology,9(1-2),19-36.
23. Machin, D.(2002).Ethnographic Research for Media Studies.London:Arnold.
24. Miles, M.(ed.),Hall, T.(ed.),Borden, I.(ed.)(2000).The City Cultures Reader.London:Routledge.
25. Miller, D.(1987).Material Culture and Mass Consumption.London:Blackwell.
26. Myers, N.(2000).Sustainable Consumption.Science,287(5462),1.
27. Myers, N.(1997).Consumption: Challenge to Sustainable Development.Science,276(5309),53-55.
28. Myers, N.(1997).Consumption in Relation to Population, Environment and Development.The Environmentalist,17(1),33-44.
29. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2002).Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD Countries.Paris:OECD.
30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2008).Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Good Practices in OECD Countries.Paris:OECD.
31. Owens, S.(2000).Engaging the Public: Information and Deliberation in Enviromental Policy.Environment and Planning A,32,1141-1148.
32. Pred, A.(1981).Social Reproduction and the Time-Geography of Everyday Life.Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography,63(1),5-22.
33. Reckwitz, A.(2002).Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.European Journal of Social Theory,5(2),243-263.
34. Redclift, M.(1996).Wasted: Counting the Costs of Global Consumption.London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.
35. Reisch, L.(2001).Time and Wealth: The Role of Time and Temporalities For Sustainable Patterns of Consumption.Time & Society,10(2-3),367.
36. Reisch, L. A.(ed.),Røpke, I.(ed.)(2004).The Ecological Economics of Consumption.Cheltenham:Edqard Elgar.
37. Ropke, I.(1999).The Dynamics of Willingness to Consume.Ecological Economics,28(3),399-420.
38. Ropke, I.(2009).Theories of practice-New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption.Ecological Economics,68(10),2490-2497.
39. Sanne, C.(2002).Willing Consumers Or Locked-In? Policies For a Sustainable Consumption.Ecological Economics,42,273-287.
40. Schultz, I.(1993).Women and waste.Capitalism Nature Socialism,4(2),51-63.
41. Schultz, I. & Stieß, I.(2009).Policies to Promote Sustainable Consumption PatternsPolicies to Promote Sustainable Consumption Patterns,Frankfurt/Main, Germany:Institute for Social-Ecological Research.
42. Schwartz Cowan, R.(1983).More Wore For Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology From the Open Hearth to the Microwave.New York:Basic Books.
43. Shove, E.(2003).Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality.Oxford:Berg.
44. Shove, E.,Warde, A.(1998).Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption and the environmentInconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption and the environment,未出版
45. Silverman, D.(2011).Qualitative Research.Los Angeles:Sage.
46. Southerton, D.(ed.),Chappells, H.(ed.),Van Vliet, B.(ed.)(2004).Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
47. Terry, G.(2009).No Climate Justice without Gender justice: an Overview of the Issues.Gender and Development,17(1),5-18.
48. Thompson, C. J.(1996).Caring Consumers: Gendered Consumption Meanings and the Juggling Lifestyle.Journal of Consumer Research,22(4),388-407.
49. United Nations Environment Programme(2008).Planning for Change: Guidelines for National Programmes on Sustainable.Paris, France:United Nations Environment Programme.
50. Vinz, D.(2009).Gender and sustainable consumption: A German environmental perspective.Enropean Journal of Women's Studies,16(159),159-179.
51. Wilk, R.(1998).Emulation, Imitation, and Global Consumerism.Organization & Environment,11(3),314.
52. Wilk, R.(2002).Consumption, Human Needs, and Global Environmental Ghange.Global Environment Change,12(1),5-13.
53. 行政院主計處(2005)。,未出版
54. 新竹市政府主計處(2010)。,未出版