台灣中部地區社會企業特色分析：組織特質、發展趨勢與社會影響力初探

The Trait Analysis of Social Enterprise in Central Taiwan

余健慈(Jiahn-Tsyr Yu)

社會企業 ； 準社會企業 ； 社會目的 ； 社會價值 ； social enterprises ； preliminary social enterprises ； social aims ； social value

國家與社會

18期（2016 / 06 / 01）

111 - 157

繁體中文

社會企業乃是以商業手法或模式解決社會問題的過程，也被視為結合社會價值和企業績效的新型態組織，是一個重要且創新的運作模式。本研究的目的在於調查中部地區（中、彰、投）社會企業發展之概況，並探索中部地區社會企業的類型和特性、組織架構與發展困境。本研究以中部地區社會企業與準社會企業為調查對象，採用文獻分析、電話訪問，與質性訪談。初步評估，中部地區社會企業在組織發展上主要以庇護工場、新創型社會企業和社會合作社為主。受訪單位所關注的社會議題，以「弱勢就業」議題最多，「社區發展」與「環境保護」次之。顯示中部地區社會企業多數著重在地發展、振興地方經濟、改善地方的生活環境，成為提供學習且多元又兼具社會意義的據點，或弱勢族群培力、協助就業，進行職業訓練與提供工作機會。多數公司型社會企業則成立於都市中，成為知識傳遞及教育推廣的空間據點，此為中區社會企業發展之發展特色。可喜的是，青年世代投入社會企業創業的現象，在中部地區，特別是台中市，也能觀察到。其關注議題範圍也因其團隊成員跨領域的專業背景而相當多元，在議題操作上也更具創意和靈活的策略。

Social enterprise (SE) is a new type of organization that combines social values with corporate performance by applying business methods or models to solve social problems. The developing process of SE itself becomes an important and innovative operating model. The purpose of this research is to investigate the development overview of SEs in central Taiwan (Taichung, Changhua and Nantou) by applying resources provided by the project and to explore these SEs' particularity, potentials in local development and developing dilemmas encountered and what differentiates them from those in other areas in types and development. We preliminarily estimated in the project that the traits of SEs in central Taiwan mainly included the post-disaster community reconstruction of 921 Earthquake, local peasant production, the businesses of nonprofit organization (NPO) development in central Taiwan, and care for the disadvantaged. Their organizational developing strategies then were mainly based on cultural creative industries, social co-operatives and sheltered workshops. As limited by time, we applied the approaches of document analysis and phone interview in the research. Regarding the attention on social issues, 'employment of the disadvantaged' ranked first and 'environmental protection' and 'community development' second. This indicates that most businesses in central Taiwan develop according to the circumstances; they revitalize the local economy, improve local living environment, provide bases for multiple learning and social meaning, and assist the employment of the disadvantaged with providing job opportunities and staff empowerment of vocational training. These emerging SEs also have bases for cultural creativity, knowledge transmission and education promotion. This characterizes the development of the SEs in central Taiwan. The preliminary investigation also found that the newly established (less than five years) SEs almost operated as corporations. This means that the phenomenon of young generation to undertake SEs not only occurs in northern Taiwan but in central Taiwan, especially in Taichung. Issues focused and operated is also with creative and flexible strategies while their team members are usually with multiple and cross-field professions.

1. 呂朝賢(2008)。社會企業與創業精神：意義與評論。國立政治大學社會學報，39，81-117。
   連結：
2. 楊君琦、郭欣怡(2011)。社會企業組織型態與經營類型之初探。輔仁管理評論，18(1)，53-78。
   連結：
3. 鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報，7，65-108。
   連結：
4. Dees, J. G. (1998). "The Meaning of 'Social Entrepreneurship'", Kansas City,MO and Palo Alto, CA: Kauffman Foundation and Stanford University.Original Draft: October 31st, 1998. Reformatted and revised: May 30th,2001, Online Available: http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf.
5. Besharov, M. L. & Smith, W. K. (2013). “Multiple Logics within Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Model of Organizational Hybridity.”Working Paper, Cornell
6. Auerswald, P. E.(2009).Creating Social Value.Stanford Social Innovation Review,Spring,51-55.
7. Austin, J.,Stevenson, H.,Wei-Skillern, J.(2006).Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,30(1),1-22.
8. Battilana, J.,Lee, M.,Walker, J.,Dorsey, C.(2012).In Search of the Hybrid Ideal.Stanford Social Innovation Review,10(3),51-55.
9. Dees, J. G.(2012).A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Ethics,111(3),321-334.
10. Dees, J. G.,Economy p.,Emerson, J.(2004).Enterprising Nonprofit: A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
11. Hamel, G.(2000).Leading the Revolution.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
12. He, Z. L.,Wong, P. K.(2004).Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.Organization Science,15(4),481-494.
13. Mair, J.,Marti, I.(2006).Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight.Journal of World Business,41(1),36-44.
14. Mair, J.,Schoen, O.(2007).Successful Social Entrepreneurial Business Models in the Context of Developing Economies.International Journal of Emerging Markets,2(1),54-68.
15. Sagawa, S.,Segal, E.(2000).Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value through Business and Social Sector Partnership.California Management Review,42(2),105-122.
16. Santos, F. M.(2012).A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Ethics,111(3),335-351.
17. Waddock, S. A.(1988).Building Successful Partnerships.Sloan Manage Review,29(4),17-23.
18. Wallace, S. L.(1999).Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Social Purpose Enterprises in Facilitating Community Economic Development.Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,4(2),153-174.
19. 吳成豐(2014)。組織倫理實踐與社會創業精神。台北市:鼎茂圖書公司。
20. 官有垣(2015)。台灣社會企業之組織特質與經營管理挑戰：2010年的調查數據分析。中國第三部門研究，7，90-115。
21. 官有垣編(2013)。社會企業：台灣與香港的比較。高雄市:巨流圖書公司。
22. 官有垣、王仕圖(2013)。台灣社會企業的能力建構與社會影響初探。社區發展季刊，143，51-67。
23. 黃德舜、鄭勝分、陳淑娟、吳佳霖(2014)。社會企業管理。新北市:指南。
24. 楊銘賢、吳濟聰、蘇哲仁、高慈蕙(2009)。社會企業經營模式。創業管理研究，4(4)，57-83。

1. 張玉龍(2020)。非營利老人福利機構的組織績效與困境：社會影響力觀點的分析。社會政策與社會工作學刊，24(2)，95-141。