题名 |
獨特視角下的章學誠研究-《章學誠研究述評(1920-1985)》之述評 |
并列篇名 |
The Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng by Unique Perspective──The Review of The Review of the Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng(1920-1985) |
作者 |
賈慶軍(Jia, Qing-jun) |
关键词 |
章學誠 ; 道 ; 六經皆史 ; 王陽明 ; Zhang xue-cheng ; Dao ; Six Confucian Classics are all Historical Works ; Wang yang-ming |
期刊名称 |
當代儒學研究 |
卷期/出版年月 |
21期(2016 / 12 / 01) |
页次 |
283 - 337 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
黃兆強教授的新著《章學誠研究述評(1920-1985)》是章學誠研究的又一力作。本文在評述該著的同時,也提出了自己的觀點。筆者發現,實齋「六經皆史」論是建立在其道論基礎上的,而實齋的道論有三個層次:第一層次的道乃萬物之所以然之「道」;第二層的道即周公之治道;第三層之道乃是載入典籍中的道。實齋之道論最後停留在第二層,這使其更接近朱子而不是陽明。 |
英文摘要 |
Professor Huang Zhao-qiang's new work of The Review of the Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng(1920-1985)is the masterpiece about the study of Zhang xue-cheng.The author also put forward his own point of view while reviewing Professor Huang Zhao-qiang's new work.The author found that Zhang xue-cheng's theory that six confucian classics were all historical works was based on his theory of Dao.His theory of Dao contained three levels: the Dao which produced everything;the Dao which Zhou Gong managing things;the Dao which recorded in the classics. Zhang xue-cheng preferenced the Dao of the second level. Zhang xue-cheng was the successor of Zhu xi but not of Wang yang-ming. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 |
参考文献 |
|