船山繼善成性觀的當代省察：以唐君毅與勞思光之異詮為中心

Contemporary Examination of the Chuanshan Concept Regarding the Experiential Stage of Moral Existence: Opposite Interpretations from Tang Chun-i and Lao Sze-Kwang

陳政揚(Chen, Cheng-yang)

氣 ； 張子正蒙注 ； 張載 ； 王夫之 ； 天人合一 ； Qi ； Zhangzi Zheng-Meng Zhu ； Zhang-zai ； Wang Fuzhi ； Unity of the heaven and man

當代儒學研究

25期（2018 / 12 / 01）

69 - 98

繁體中文

船山哲學是近年學界研究宋明清儒學的焦點之一。但儘管唐君毅與勞思光，兩位當代儒學彥碩，對船山哲學有近乎兩端的評價。學界卻較少有專文探討此一現象。故本文試以「船山繼善成性觀的當代省察」為題，探究二氏之異詮與交鋒。本文研究進路有三：一、整理唐、勞著作中，有關船山繼善成性觀之論述。並以二者徵引船山文獻為指標，初步建立對比二氏詮釋船山哲學的論點交鋒。二、以《船山全書》為據，由第一手文獻檢視二氏徵引船山文獻是否正確？並釐清二氏詮釋船山哲學的關鍵分歧。建立第二序評述二氏詮釋船山哲學的文獻基礎。三、藉由二氏其後的船山學研究，探討何者更能近年船山學的發展相呼應？由此作為本文辨析唐、勞論船山繼善成性觀的旁證之一。

Chuanshan philosophy is one of the recent focuses of academic research on Confucianism during the Song, Ming, and Qing dynasties. Although Tang Chun-i and Lao Sze-Kwang, two prominent Confucianism scholars, expressed divergent opinions regarding Chuanshan philosophy, few academic studies have analyzed their disagreement. Thus, this study discussed the different interpretations between the two scholars in terms of the examination by contemporary scholars on the Chuanshan concept regarding the experimental stage of moral existence. The following three research methods were employed. (1) The study gathered the discourses of Tang and Lao on Chuanshan philosophy. A preliminary comparison was conducted using the opposing arguments of the two scholars regarding their interpretation of Chuanshan philosophy. (2) Using the Complete Works of Chuanshan as a reference, we determined whether the arguments proposed by the two scholars matched the original source and clarified the key divergences between the scholars' interpretations. The second evaluation and description was then established regarding the scholars' interpretations of the fundamental research of Chuanshan philosophy. (03) Using Chuanshan philosophy research published after those of the two scholars for comparison, we discussed which scholars' interpretations were closer to those of the current research school on Chuanshan philosophy. This study used the aforementioned methods to analyze the interpretations of Tang and Lao on the Chuanshan concept regarding the experiential stage of moral existance.

1. 林月惠(2016)。「異議」的再議——近世東亞的「理學」與「氣學」。東吳哲學學報，34，97-144。
   連結：
2. 王夫之(2011)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
3. 王夫之(2011)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
4. 王夫之(2011)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
5. 王夫之(2011)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。
6. 朱熹、朱傑人編、嚴佐之編、劉永翔編(2002)。朱子全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
7. 周敦頤(2009)。周敦頤集。北京:中華書局。
8. 林月惠(2008)。詮釋與工夫：宋明理學的超越蘄嚮與內在辯證。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。
9. 唐君毅(2004)。哲學概論。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
10. 唐君毅(1999)。中國哲學原論‧原教篇。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
11. 袁保新(2008)。從海德格、老子、孟子到當代新儒學。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
12. 張載(2006)。張載集。北京:中華書局。
13. 陳立勝(2011)。「身體」與「詮釋」—宋明儒學論集。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
14. 勞思光(2000)。文化問題論集新編。香港:中文大學出版社。
15. 勞思光(1997)。新編中國哲學史。臺北:三民書局。
16. 勞思光(1997)。新編中國哲學史。臺北:三民書局。
17. 蔡家和(2013)。王船山《讀孟子大全說》研究。臺北:臺灣學生書局。