元代龍仁夫《易》學析論

An Analysis of Long Ren Fu's Yijing learning in the Yuan Dynasty

楊自平(Yang, Tzu-ping)

龍仁夫 ； 周易集傳 ； 朱子 ； 元代 ； 易學 ； Long Ren Fu ； Zhouyijichuan ； Zhuzi ； Yuan Dynasty ； Yijing learning

當代儒學研究

28期（2020 / 06 / 01）

37 - 74

繁體中文

元末《易》家龍仁夫著有《周易集傳》。龍氏治《易》承繼朱子《易》為卜筮之書及四聖作《易》，然釋《易》宗旨與方式不同於朱子探求《易》本義，僅得視為尊朱。龍氏基於四聖《易》及象占說，進而指出伏羲卦畫與卦名的關聯，文王、周公據伏羲卦象作《易》辭，並致力闡釋《易》辭之取象，使卦畫與卦名、《易》辭緊密聯結，且以解釋上是否合於經旨、通例為依據。然亦正視卦畫與《易》辭間無必然性，釋《易》不可僵固。相較歷來重釋象及特別重義理釋《易》的《易》家，龍氏有效的將卦畫、《易》辭的象辭、占辭之訓詁、義理完整聯結，並將六十四卦整體考察，盡可能對《易》辭作出合理詮解，展現義理、取象、占筮的緊密關聯，並為許多《易》辭解釋賦予新意，值得肯定。

Yi-ologist of late Yuan Dynasty Long Ren Fu had written Zhouyijichuan. Long's Yijing learning inherits Zhuzi's point of view, that his Yijing learning was the book of divination and Yijing was made of four saints. However, the purpose and method of Long's Yijing-interpretation are different from Zhuzi's, where he ha explored the original meaning of Yijing. Based on the Four Saints' Yijing learning and Xiangzhan theory, Long pointed to the connection between Fuxi's drawing the trigrams and the name of the Eight Diagrams. Wenwang and Zhougong's remarks on Yijing are based on Fu Xi's imagery, and they are devoted to interpreting the imagery of Yijing, so diagrams, name of the Diagrams and Yijing words can be closely linked. Also, based on whether the interpretation is in line with the purpose and general rules. However, there is no inevitability between the diagrams and the Yijing-Words, and the interpretation of Yijing cannot be rigid. Compared to the other Yi-ologists who had always reinterpreted the diagrams and the special meaning of Yijing, Long's theory effectively connected the paintings of the diagrams , the words of the Yijing, the remarks of the rhetoric, and the righteousness, taking the Hexagram into a comprehensive inspection , as far as possible, making a reasonable interpretation of the Yijing , showing the close relationship between righteousness, imagery, and divination, and giving new meaning to many Yijing words. It is worthy of recognition.

1. 永瑢(1995).四庫全書總目.北京:中華書局.
2. 朱熹(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
3. 朱熹(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
4. 朱彝尊(1998).經義考.北京:中華書局.
5. 李超(2010)。元代科考文獻考官批語輯錄及其價值。中國典籍與文化，74，138-144。
6. 柏俊才(2014)。柏俊才湖北問津書院講學與黃州地區儒學的傳播。江漢大學學報（社會科學版），2014(2)，63-68。
7. 陳利媛(2005)。明代問津書院崛起原因略析。湖北大學學報（哲學社會科學版），32(4)，438-441。
8. 程廷祚(1983).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
9. 馮鵬(2014)。龍仁夫《周易集傳》易象學思想初探。周易研究，2014(1)，22-30。
10. 黃虞稷(1990).千頃堂書目.上海:上海古籍出版社.
11. 董真卿(1996).通志堂經解.揚州:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社.
12. 龍仁夫(1976).無求備齋《易經集成》.臺北:成文出版社.