從「心本於性」看韓儒田艮齋的儒家人文關懷

Confucian humanistic care of Chosan Confucianist Ganjae from the perspective of ＂Xin is based on Xing＂

楊祖漢(Yang, Cho-hon)

艮齋 ； 朝鮮儒學 ； 性師心弟 ； 康德 ； 尊敬 ； Ganjae ； Chosan Confucianism ； xing as teachers ； xin as student ； Kant ； reverence

當代儒學研究

29期（2020 / 12 / 01）

87 - 114

繁體中文

田艮齋是韓國朝鮮朝末期重要儒者，他的思想很有特色，他主張「性師心弟」，即以性為本、為師，而要求自己的主體，即心，對性嚴格遵守。他這一說法很能凸顯以性為尊、以心為卑的實踐理論型態。這一主張含有對人心能自我作主，及通過努力而成聖成賢，這是人心的可貴處；但此一可貴的地方，也隱藏了罪惡產生的根源，即人容易由於自我作主而濫用其自由，而這就是人間罪惡發生的根源。本文以此為論說的重心，表達了艮齋的人文關懷。本文認為艮齋對於敬天理或敬畏之情的重視，就是對於性師心弟論道德動力來源的說明，在此處引入康德的說法來幫助說明。艮齋對於明德的看法，也清楚表達的上述的思想。

Ganjae was an important Confucian in the late Chosan dynasty, and his thoughts were very unique and distinctive. He advocated that ＂Xing (human nature) should be the teacher, and Xin(mind) should be the student＂, that is, taking Xing as the basis and being the teacher, and asked his subject, namely Xin, to strictly abide by Xing. His statement can highlight the theoretical system of self-cultivation which emphasized Xing and devalued Xin. This position suggests that the Xin can be the master of itself and make human beings become sage through effort- this is the most valuable part of the human mind. However, this is also the potential roots of evil that may lead people easily to misuse their freedom. This paper takes the foregoing observation as the focus of its discussion and illustrates the humanistic care of Ganjae. This paper holds that Ganjae's emphasis on the respect for the principle of Heaven or the reverence is an expression of the source of moral motivation of Xing as teachers and Xin as student. In this regard, Kant's concept of reverence/ respect might be helpful for the explanation of Ganjae's view. Ganjae's understanding of Mingde also clearly express the above thoughts.

1. 田愚(2004).艮齋先生文集.首爾:民族文化推進會.
2. 朱熹(1986).朱子語類.北京:中華書局.
3. 牟宗三(2003).牟宗三先生全集.臺北:聯經出版社.
4. 牟宗三(1969).心體與性體.臺北:正中書局.
5. 牟宗三（譯註）(2003).牟宗三先生全集.臺北:聯經出版社.
6. 余若瀾(2020)。余若瀾：〈論田艮齋與顧涇陽的主理思想〉，國立中央大學「朱子與朝鮮儒學」期末報告，2020 年 10 月 7 日。
7. 李相益(2005).畿湖性理學論考.首爾:心山出版社.
8. 李珥(1986).栗谷全書.首爾:成均館大學校大東文化研究院.
9. 胡宏,吳仁華（點校）(1987).胡宏集.北京:中華書局.
10. 唐君毅(1974).中國哲學原論.香港:新亞研究所.
11. 陳繪宇(2020)。田艮齋〈性師心弟說〉及其中所涵的「道德動力」問題。「雛鳳清聲：文哲青年學者夏季論壇」會議論文，臺北:
12. 楊祖漢(2017).從當代儒學觀點看韓國儒學的重要論爭續編.臺北:臺灣大學人社高研院東亞儒學研究中心.
13. 謝扶雅（譯）(1972).康德的道德哲學.香港:基督教文藝出版社.

1. 孫致文(2023)。朱子學視域下的艮齋禮學思想詮釋。鵝湖學誌，70，1-31。