大專男生的自我觀與強制女性性交行為

View of Self and Forced Sex Against Women in Male College Students

黃軍義(Jiun-Yih Huang)

大專男生 ； 社會取向自我 ； 個人取向自我 ； 強制性交 ； forced sex against women ； individual-oriented self ； male college student ； social-oriented self

亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊

11卷1期（2015 / 07 / 01）

29 - 46

繁體中文

無論國內或國外的研究，皆甚少從自我的觀點探究強制女性性交行為。為彌補此一缺口，本研究從華人的自我觀（包括社會取向與個人取向自我兩個部分）出發，探討它與強制女性性交行為的關聯。本研究以無記名自陳式問卷調查法蒐集資料，調查的對象為大專學生，是一個具有全國代表性的樣本。本研究取其中男生的部分，計有效樣本數732位，進行資料分析。研究結果發現，自陳具有強制女性性交經驗的大專男生的社會取向自我觀較自陳沒有強制女性性交經驗的大專男生低、社會取向自我觀與大專男生強制女性性交行為的關聯高於個人取向自我觀、社會及個人取向自我觀皆低的大專男生做出強制女性性交行為的比例最高。文末就研究結果的意涵、實務應用、研究限制、與未來研究方向進行討論。

Whether in Taiwan or western countries few research has investigated the forced sex against women from the perspective of view of self. To make up for this gap this study explored the relationship between Chinese view of self (containing social-oriented and individual-oriented components) and men's forced sex against women. We used anonymous self-reported questionnaire to collect data. Participants involved a nationally representative sample of college students. From which we adopted male college students to conduct data analysis, the sample size is 732. The results showed that male college students with the experience of forcing sex against women had lower social-oriented view of self than those without the experience of forcing sex against women, social-oriented view of self presented a stronger correlation with male college students' forced sex against women than individual-oriented view of self, male college students with both lower social-oriented and individual-oriented view of self revealed the most experiences of forcing sex against women. Finally we discussed the implications, applications, limitations, and suggestions for future research in the present study.

1. 黃軍義(2014)。敵視女性態度、強暴迷思、與強暴行為。教育心理學報，45(3)，393-412。
   連結：
2. 簡晉龍、李美枝、黃囇莉(2009)。幸福之路：雙重自我建構的分流與匯合。中華心理學刊，51，453-470。
   連結：
3. 教育部（2015）：《教育部品德促進方案》。2015 年4 月10 日取自教育部品德教育資源網：http://ce.naer.edu.tw/policy.php。
4. Archer, J.(Ad.)(1994).Male violence.London:Routledge.
5. Baron, L.,Straus, M.(1989).Four theories of rape in American society.New Haven:Yale University Press.
6. Bartol, C. R.、Bartol, A. M.、李執中譯(2010)。犯罪心理學。台北市:華杏出版社。
7. Blake, E.,Gannon, T. A.(2014).Investigating the implicit theories of rape-prone men using an interpretative bias task.Legal and Criminological Psychology,19,40-53.
8. Bohner, G.,Jarvis, C.,Eyssel, F.,Siebler, F.(2005).The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men.European Journal of Social Psychology,35(6),819-828.
9. Brownmiller, S.(1975).Against our will: Men, women and rape.New York:Simon & Schuster.
10. Burt, M. R.(1980).Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38,217-230.
11. Cowan, G.(2009).The causes of rape: Antisociality and reproductive strategies.Sex Roles,61,136-139.
12. Gebhard, P. H.,Gagnon, J. H.,Pomeroy, W. B.,Christenson, C. V.(1965).Sex offender: An analysis of types.New York:Harper & Row.
13. Groth, A. N.,Birnbaum, H. J.(1979).Men who rape: The psychology of the offender.New York:Plenum.
14. Hall, G.C.,Hirschman, R.(1991).Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59,662-669.
15. Jolliffe, D.,Farrington, D. P.,Hawkins, J. D.,Catalano, R. F.,Hill, K. G.,Kosterrman, R.(2003).Predictive, concurrent, prospective and retrospective validity of self-reported delinquency.Criminal Behavior and Mental Health,13,179-197.
16. Koss, M. P.,Dinero, T.(1988).Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students.Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives,New York:
17. Koss, M. P.,Gidycz, C. A.,Wisniewski, N.(1987).The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,55,162-170.
18. Lu, L.,Kao, S. F.,Chang, T. T.,Wu, H. P.,Zhang, J.(2008).The individual-and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: A sub-cultural analysis contrasting mainland Chinese and Taiwanese.Social Behavior & Personality,36,337-346.
19. Malamuth, N. M.,Linz, D.,Heavey, C. L.,Barnes, G.,Acker, M.(1995).Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women : A 10-year follow-up study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69,353-369.
20. Mann, R. E.,Hollin, C. R.(2007).Sexual offenders' explanations for their offending.Journal of Sexual Aggression,13,3-9.
21. Markus, H.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98,224-253.
22. Mischel, W.(1973).Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review,80,252-283.
23. Nunes, K. L.,Hermann, C. A.,Renee Malcom, J.,Lavoie, K.(2013).Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism.Child Abuse & Neglect,37(9),703-711.
24. Pervin, L. A.,Cervone, D.(2010).Personality theory and research.NJ:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
25. Singh, A.(1979).Reliability and validity of self-reported delinquency studies: A review.Psychological Reports,44,987-993.
26. Smithyman, S. D.(1978).Claremont Graduate University.
27. Sussenbach, P.,Eyssel, F.,Bohner, G.(2013).Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,28,2250-2272.
28. 翁家英、楊國樞、許燕(2008)。華人多元自尊的概念分析與量表建構：本土觀點。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，台北:
29. 陸洛、楊國樞(2008)。當代華人的傳統與現代雙文化自我：其現身、組成與變遷。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，台北:
30. 黃軍義(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣心理學研究所。
31. 黃軍義、簡誼萍(2012)。違反女性意願性交及性侵害兒童量表的建立初探。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，8(2)，55-90。
32. 楊國樞(2008)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，台北:
33. 楊國樞、陸洛(2008)。社會取向自我實現者與個人取向自我實現者的心理特徵：概念分析與實徵衡鑑。中國人的自我：心理學的分析，台北:
34. 廖玲燕(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所。