突破障礙還是創造障礙？社會工作觀點對臺灣智能障礙者性侵害防治服務的省思

Overcoming Obstacles or Creating Obstacles? Reflections on Sexual Assault Prevention and Services for People with Intellectual Disability in Taiwan-From the Perspective of Social Work

林佩瑾(Pei Chin Lin)

性侵害 ； 智能障礙 ； 保護性服務 ； 個案管理 ； sexual assault ； people with intellectual disability ； protective services ； case management

亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊

15卷2期（2019 / 12 / 01）

65 - 94

繁體中文

本研究目的在探索臺灣智能障礙性侵害防治社會工作的現況與問題，從性侵害防治社工人員的觀點與經驗，了解問題特性、服務現況及困境，並提出解決策略與建議。本研究採取質性研究方法，實地進入臺灣19個縣市性侵害防治中心，透過個別訪談及焦點團體方式蒐集資料。研究結果發現，目前的實務困境包括司法詢問制度忽視智能障礙者的主體性、社工在「保護」與「自主」間的兩難、與身心障礙福利資源合作的問題、保護性服務分工模式造成服務的排擠效應、行政工作與個案服務難以兼顧、究責性環境造成沉重的生存壓力等。因此，本研究建議發展在地培力與諮詢團隊模式，以促進資源整合與合作，並強化對智能障礙者性權利的倡議，期盼喚起學者與社會大眾共同關心此議題，進而推動相關政策與專業的發展。

The purpose of this study is to explore the current situation and problems of sexual assault prevention for people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan, from the perspectives and experiences of sexual assault prevention social workers, to understand the characteristics of the problem, the latest service development and practical dilemma, as well as make recommendations and solutions. Based on the qualitative approach, this research explores the needs, experiences and opinions of professionals and experts in the field of sexual assault prevention or intellectual disabilities in 19 counties and collect data by individual interviews and focus groups. The study found that the current work dilemmas include the judicial system and forensic interview neglecting the subjectivity of the intellectually disabled, barriers to cooperation between welfare resources, social workers' dilemma between ＂protection＂ and ＂self-determination＂, the crowding out effect of the service due to the division of protective social work services, the difficulty of balancing administrative work with case services and calling to account leading to heavy survival pressure stress. Therefore, this study proposes to develop a local empowerment and consultation team model and strengthen initiatives for sexual rights of people with intellectual disability people. I hope that this study will arouse scholars and the public is concerned about sexual assault prevention for intellectual disabilities, and further promote the development of relevant policies and professions.

1. 林純真(2010)。智能障礙者性議題之百年進展。特殊教育季刊，117，16-25。
   連結：
2. 陳慧女,林明傑(2007)。臺灣近二十年來性侵害研究之脈絡與趨勢。臺大社會工作學刊，14，213-259。
   連結：
3. 劉文英(2009)。社工員執行智能障礙者性侵害防治工作所面臨的困境與需求。臺大社會工作學刊，19，41-86。
   連結：
4. 劉文英,陳慧女(2006)。心智障礙者遭受性侵害的調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，31，23-42。
   連結：
5. Barger, E.,Barger, J.,Macy, R.,Parish, S.(2009).Sexual assault prevention for women with intellectual disabilities: a critical review of the evidence.Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,47(4),249-262.
6. Benedet, J.,Grant I.(2014).Sexual Assault and the Meaning of Power and Authority for Women with Mental Disabilities.Feminist Legal Studies,22(2),131-154.
7. Benedet, J.,Grant I.(2007).Hearing the sexual assault complaints of women with mental disabilities: Consent, capacity, and mistaken belief.McGill Law Journal,52(2),243-289.
8. Briggs, F.(1995).Developing personal safety skills: In children with disabilities.London:Jessica Kingsley.
9. Carlson, B. E.(1997).Mental retardation and domestic violence: An ecological approach to intervention.Social Work,42(1),79-89.
10. Chenoweth, L.(1996).Violence and women with disabilities: Silence and paradox.Violence Against Women,2(4),391-411.
11. Doyle, S.(2010).The notion of consent to sexual activity for persons with mental disabilities.Liverpool Law Review,31(2),111-135.
12. Finkelhor, D.(1987).The trauma of child sexual abuse: two models.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2(4),348-366.
13. Firth, H.,Balogh, R.,Berney, T.,Bretherton, K.,Graham, S.,Whibley, S.(2001).Psychopathology of sexual abuse in young people with intellectual disability.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,45(3),244-255.
14. Furey, E. M.(1994).Sexual abuse of adults with mental retardation: Who and where.Mental Retardation,32(3),173-180.
15. Goodman, S.,Trowler, I.(2012).Social work reclaimed innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice.London:Jessica Kingsley.
16. Kempton W.,Kahn, E.(1991).Sexuality and people with disabilities: A historical perspective.Sexuality and Disability,9(2),93-111.
17. Mansell, S.,Sobsey, D.,Moskal, R.(1998).Clinical findings among sexually abused children with and without developmental disabilities.Mental Retardation,36(1),12-22.
18. Parchomiuk, M.(2012).Model of intellectual disability and the relationship of attitudes towards the sexuality of persons with an intellectual disability.Sexuality and Disability,31(2),125-139.
19. Shanley, Mary Lyndon(Ed.),Narayan, Uma(Ed.)(1997).Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives.Pennsylvania State University Press.
20. Sobsey, D.(1994).Violence and Abuse in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The End of Silent Acceptance?.Baltimore:Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.
21. Sobsey, D.,Doe, T.(1991).Patterns of sexual abuse and assault.Journal of Sexuality and Disability,9(3),243-259.
22. 王國羽（編）,林昭吟（編）,張恆豪（編）(2012).障礙研究：理論與政策應用.高雄:巨流.
23. 孫一信,林美薰(2001)。揭開神祕面紗-智障者受性侵害之綜合分析與相關政策建議。智障者遭受性侵害創傷心理輔導系列--輔導制度之建立研討會，臺北:
24. 張錦麗(2005)。南投縣，國立暨南大學。
25. 陳伯偉、周月清、陳俊賢、張恆豪（2018 年 7 月 10 日）。智能障礙、性/別歧視以及隔離式機構共謀下的集體性侵。巷仔口社會學【線上論壇】。取自https://twstreetcorner.org/2018/07/10/chenchouchenchang/
26. 陳慧女,劉文英(2006)。性侵害防治專業人員處遇心智障礙受害者之困境與需求之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害，2(2)，53-90。
27. 黃翠紋,陳佳雯(2012)。我國性侵害防治政策推動現況之研究。警政論叢，12，1-31。
28. 劉文英(2016)。特殊教育教師知覺的性侵害防治政策執行之困境分析。教育政策論壇，19(2)，125-155。
29. 劉文英(2010)。當智能障礙者被性侵害之後—談家屬所知覺的社會工作服務需求。東臺灣特殊教育學報，12，155-168。
30. 潘淑滿(2005)。內政部委託研究計畫成果報告內政部委託研究計畫成果報告,內政部。
31. 顏佳珍(2009)。新北市，國立臺北大學。