英文摘要
|
Through in-depth interviews with three social workers in full-time residential and educational institutions for the physically and mentally handicapped, researchers gained insights into their roles and functions in the service process of such institutions. The study also aimed to understand the service delivery model of these full-time residential institutions and to analyze the challenges and solutions encountered by social workers in these settings. Furthermore, based on the research findings, suggestions will be put forth to enhance the system. The primary objective of full-time residential institutions is to alleviate the difficulties families face in caring for the physically or mentally handicapped. As a result, these institutions serve as an alternative to the traditional family caregiving role. It's crucial to note that social workers should not take on the responsibilities of education and nursing staff. The findings revealed that in situations where there's a shortage of nursing personnel, social workers often step in to fill the gap, leading to a severe breach of regulations concerning the facilities and staffing of welfare institutions for the disabled. To safeguard the rights and interests of social workers, periodic inspections are essential. Institutions should be guided to provide training for social work supervisors. This approach ensures both the personal and professional growth of social workers. Furthermore, maintaining a robust professional supervision system is paramount to retaining skilled workers and enhancing both the proficiency of social workers and the overall service quality.
|
参考文献
|
-
鈕文英(2009)。美國智能和發展障礙協會 2010 年定義的內容和意涵。國小特殊教育,49,21-32。
連結:
-
Connaway, R. S.,Gentry, M. E.(1988).Social Work Practice.Pearson College Div.
-
Lincoln, Y.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
-
Lister, Larry(1987).Ethnocultural Content in Social Work Education.Journal of Social Work Education,23(1),31-39.
-
Payne, M.(2014).Modern social work theory.Lyceum Books.
-
Tsui, Ming-sum(2004).Social Work Supervision: Contexts and Concepts.Sage Publications, Inc..
-
方念萱 (2020)。《平權面面觀: 從 CEDAW 與 CRPD 看如何尊重多元》。國家通訊委員會網站(https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/22111/5538_48225_221110_1.pdf)。
-
李政賢(譯),Seidman, I.(2009).訪談研究法.臺北:五南出版社.
-
周月清(2002)。成年心智障礙者社區居住-從教養院搬到社區獨立生活台灣與美國經驗。社區發展季刊,97,227-253。
-
周月清(2000).障礙福利與社會工作.臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
-
林怡君(2010)。東海大學社會工作學系。
-
林萬億,吳慧菁,林珍珍(2009)。國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統(ICF)與我國身心障礙者權益保障。社區發展季刊,136,278-295。
-
張宏哲(譯),Hepworth, D. H.,Rooney, R. H.,Larsen, J. A.(1999).社會工作直接服務.台北:洪葉文化事業有限公司.
-
張祐綾(譯),陳若平(譯),Rubin,Babbie, E. R.(2007).社會工作研究法.臺北:五南.
-
陳向明(2009).社會科學-質的研究.臺北:五南出版社.
-
陳寶珠(2010)。《身心障礙福利住宿機構何去何從?》。臺灣社區居住與獨立生活聯盟網站:(http://communitylivingorg.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_1231.htm)。
-
鈕文英(2020).質性研究方法與論文寫作.臺北:雙葉書廊.
-
潘淑滿(2003).質性研究-理論與運用.臺北市:心理出版社.
-
蔡漢賢(編)(2000).社會工作辭典.臺北市:內政部社區發展雜誌社.
-
衛生福利部(2013)。《身心障礙者鑑定作業辦法》。全國法規資料庫網站:(https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020020&kw=%e8%ba%ab%e5%bf%83%e9%9a%9c%e7%a4%99%e8%80%85%e9%91%91%e5%ae%9a%e4%bd%9c%e6%a5%ad%e8%be%a6%e6%b3%95)。
-
衛生福利部(2022)。《身心障礙福利機構設施及人員配置標準》。全國法規資料庫網站:(https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050048)。
-
衛生福利部(2021)。《身心障礙者權益保障法》。全國法規資料庫網站:(https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050046&kw=%e9%9a%9c%e7%a4%99%e8%80%85%e6%ac%8a%e7%9b%8a%e4%bf%9d%e9%9a%9c%e6%b3%95)。
-
衛生福利部統計處(2023)。〈身心障礙者福利機構概況〉,《社會福利公務統計一覽表》。衛生福利部網站:(https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5337-62357-113.html)。
-
簡春安,鄒平儀(2016).社會工作研究法.高雄:巨流圖書.
|