歷史社會學的方法論爭議

The Methodological Debates over Historical Sociology

10.30401/RSS.201304_7(1).0004

苗延威(Yen-Wei Miao)

歷史社會學 ； 比較社會學 ； 歷史轉向 ； 方法論爭議 ； 穆勒比較法 ； Historical sociology ； Comparative sociology ； The historical turn ； Methodological debates ； Mill's methods

社會科學論叢

7卷1期（2013 / 04 / 01）

99 - 147

繁體中文

本文回顧了「歷史社會學」在1980年代由Theda Skocpol等先驅者引領的「歷史轉向」風潮，以及在這個發展裡，包括它與穆勒比較法和比較社會學的結合，其中所涉及的一些重要方法論爭議。透過1990年代批評者的種種質疑，以及歷史社會學者的多方向辯護，將有助於我們省思歷史社會學的侷限，並探索可能的化解途徑。歷史社會學躋身為社會學學門旁支或次領域的「方法化」過程，反映了歷史社會學仍處於灰色地帶，這不僅是由於它在社會學理論與歷史材料之間，存在著模糊難分的關係，同時也是由於它與戰後初期渴望回歸古典社會學傳統的批判精神漸行漸遠，而這正是晚近歷史社會學者意識到的「馴化」危機。本文討論了數波歷史社會學的方法論爭議，藉由剖析這些一來一往的攻防論辯，期盼可以為歷史社會學在相關知識體系中的位置，及其可能遭遇的難題，提供一個有所助益的參考架構。

This article reviews the process whereby Theda Skocpol and other pioneers of the ”historical turn” in the 1980s, by employing J. S. Mill's methods and other comparative research designs, have led a generation of sociologists to claim legitimacy for historical sociology and how they have been involved within the so-called ”methodological debates” with mainstream sociologists in the 1990s. The debates show more than confirming the already confirmed. The warnings proposed by critics help sociologists rethink and deal with the possible limits of historical sociology. Historical sociology is viewed as a gray area not only because of its obscure relations both to sociological theories and historical data, but also because of its being ”domesticated” as a methodologically-oriented subfield in the discipline rather than maintaining its critical spirit and its longing for reviving the classical tradition since the early postwar period. This article discusses several waves of the methodological debates over historical sociology. By analyzing these debates, it aims to provide us a useful frame of reference to define historical sociology among relevant academic disciplines and to overcome the challenges we are going to face with.

1. 趙剛(2000)。社會學要如何才能和激進民主掛勾？─重訪米爾士的『社會學想像』。台灣社會研究季刊，39，191-237。
   連結：
2. Abbott, Andrew(1992).From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism.Sociological Methods and Research,20(4),428-455.
3. Abbott, Andrew(1997).On the Concept of Turning Point.Comparative Social Research,16,85-105.
4. Abrams, Philip(1982).Historical Sociology.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
5. Amenta, Edwin(1991).Making the Most of a Case Study: Theories of the Welfare State and the American Experience.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,32(1-2),172-194.
6. Amenta, Edwin,Poulsen, Jane D.(1994).Where to Begin: A Survey of Five Approaches to Selecting Independent Measures for Qualitative Comparative Analysis.Sociological Methods and Research,23(1),22-53.
7. Aminzade, Ronald(1992).Historical Sociology and Time.Sociological Methods and Research,20(4),456-480.
8. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk,De Meur, Gisele(1997).Reduction of Complexity for a Small-N Analysis: A Stepwise Multi-Methodological Approach.Comparative Social Research,16,133-162.
9. Brewer, John D.(2004).Imagining The Sociological Imagination; the Biographical Context of A Sociological Classic.British Journal of Sociology,55(3),319-333.
10. Calhoun, Craig(1998).Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific theory.American Journal of Sociology,104(3),846-871.
11. Dierkes, Meinolf(ed.),Weiler, Hans N.(ed.),Berthoin, Ariane(ed.)(1987).Comparative Policy Research: Learning from Experience.NY:St. Martin's Press.
12. Durkheim, Émile,Halls, W. D.(Tr.)(1982).The Rules of Sociological Method.NY:The Free Press.
13. Durkheim, Émile、胡偉譯(1999)。社會學方法的規則。北京:華夏。
14. Durkheim, Émile、許德珩譯(1999)。社會學方法論。台北:台灣商務。
15. Durkheim, Émile、黃丘隆譯(1989)。社會學研究方法論。台北:結構群。
16. Foran, John(ed.)(1997).Theorizing Revolutions.London:Routledge.
17. Goldstone, Jack A.(1998).Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence, and Explanation in Historical Sociology.American Journal of Sociology,104(3),829-845.
18. Goldstone, Jack A.(1997).Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology.Comparative Social Research,16,107-120.
19. Goldthorpe, John H.(1991).The Use of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies.British Journal of Sociology,42(2),211-230.
20. Goldthorpe, John H.(1997).Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Response to the Commentaries.Comparative Social Research,16,121-132.
21. Goldthorpe, John H.(1997).Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Debate on Methodological Issues.Comparative Social Research,16,1-26.
22. Griffin, Larry J.(1992).Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology: An Introduction.Sociological Methods and Research,20(4),403-427.
23. Griffin, Larry J.,Korstad, Robert R.(1998).Historical Inference and Event-Structure Analysis.International Review of Social History,43(Supplement 6),145-165.
24. Griffin, Larry J.,Ragin, Charles C.(1994).Some Observations on Formal Methods of Qualitative Analysis.Sociological Methods and Research,23(1),4-21.
25. Hammersley, Martyn(1997).Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on Its Prospects and Problems.Sociology,31(1),131-142.
26. Haydu, Jeffery(1998).Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and as Sequences of Problem Solving.American Journal of Sociology,104(2),339-371.
27. Hicks, Alexander(1994).Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction: The Case of the Emergence of Social Security States.Sociological Methods and Research,23(1),86-113.
28. Isaac, Larry W.,Street, Debra A.,Knapp, Stan J.(1994).Analyzing Historical Contingency with Formal Methods: The Case of the 'Relief Explosion' and 1968.Sociological Methods and Research,23(1),114-141.
29. Kelle, Udo(ed.)(1995).Qualitative Methodology and Computers.London:Sage.
30. King, Gary,Keohane, Robert,Verba, Sidney(1994).Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.Princeton, NJ:Princeton Univer sity Press.
31. Kiser, Edgar,Hechter, Michael(1991).The Role of General Theory in Comparative-Historical Sociology.American Journal of Sociology,97(1),1-30.
32. Kiser, Edgar,Hechter, Michael(1998).The Debate on Historical Sociology: Rational Choice Theory and Its Critics.American Journal of Sociology,104(3),785-816.
33. Lieberson, Stanley(1985).Making It Count.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
34. Lijphart, Arend(1971).Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.American Political Science Review,65(3),682-693.
35. Lustick, Ian(1996).History, Historiography, and Political Science: Historical Records and Selection Bias.American Political Science Review,90(3),605-618.
36. Mahoney, James(1999).Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis.American Journal of Sociology,104(4),1154-1196.
37. Markoff, John(1990).A Comparative Method: Reflections on Charles Ragin's Innovations in Comparative Analysis.Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History,23(4),177-181.
38. Mauthner, Natasha S.,Parry, Odette,Backett-Milburn, Kathryn(1998).The Data Are Out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data.Sociology,32(4),733-745.
39. McDonald, Terrence J.(1996).What We Talk about When We Talk about History: The Conversations of History and Sociology.The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,Ann Arbor, MI:
40. McDonald, Terrence J.(ed.)(1996).The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences.Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan Press.
41. Mill, John Stuart(1952).A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive.NY:Harper & Brothers.
42. Mills, C. Wright(1959).The Sociological Imagination.NY:Oxford University Press.
43. Mills, C. Wright、張君玫譯、劉鈐佑譯(1995)。社會學的想像。台北:巨流。
44. Moore, Barrington, Jr.(1966).Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World.Boston:Beacon.
45. Nichols, Elizabeth(1986).Skocpol on Revolution: Comparative Analysis vs. Historical Conjuncture.Comparative Social Research,9,163-186.
46. Nissen, Sylke(1998).The Case of Case Studies: On the Methodological Discussion in Comparative Political Science.Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology,32(4),399-418.
47. Platt, Jennifer(1981).Evidence and Proof in Documentary Research.Sociological Review,29(1),31-66.
48. Przeworski, Adam,Teune, Henry(1970).The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry.NY:Wiley.
49. Quadagno, Jill,Knapp, Stan(1992).Have Historical Sociologist Forsaken Theory? Thoughts on the Theory/History Relationship.Sociological Methods and Research,20(4),481-507.
50. Ragin, Charles C.(1987).The Comparative Method.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
51. Ragin, Charles C.(1997).Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research.Comparative Social Research,16,27-42.
52. Ragin, Charles C.(1998).The Logic of Qualitative Comparative Analysis.Comparative Social Research,43(Supplement 6),105-124.
53. Ragin, Charles C.(ed.),Becker, Howard S.(ed.)(1992).What is a Case?.NY:Cambridge University Press.
54. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich,Stephens, John D.(1997).Comparing Historical Sequences - A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe's 'Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology'.Comparative Social Research,16,55-72.
55. Sewell, William, Jr.(1996).Three temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,Ann Arbor, MI:
56. Skocpol, Theda(1984).Sociology's Historical Imagination.Vision and Method in Historical Sociology,NY:
57. Skocpol, Theda(1979).States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia & China.NY:Cambridge University Press.
58. Skocpol, Theda(1984).Emerging Agendas and Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology.Vision and Method in History Sociology,NY:
59. Skocpol, Theda(1986).Analyzing Causal Configurations in History: A Rejoinder to Nichols.Comparative Social Research,9,187-194.
60. Skocpol, Theda(ed.)(1984).Vision and Method in Historical Sociology.NY:Cambridge University Press.
61. Skocpol, Theda,Somers, Margaret(1980).The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.Comparative Studies in Society and History,22(2),174-197.
62. Somers, Margaret R.(1996).Where Is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge Cultures, Narratives, and Historical Epistemologies.The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,Ann Arbor, MI:
63. Somers, Margaret R.(1998).'We're No Angels': Realism, Rational Choice, and Relationality in Social Science.American Journal of Sociology,104(3),722-784.
64. Stinchcombe, Arthur L.(1968).Constructing Social Theories.NY:Harcourt, Brace, and World.
65. Stryker, Robin(1996).Beyond History versus Theory: Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation.Sociological Methods and Research,24(3),304-352.
66. Tarrow, Sidney(1994).Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics.NY:Cambridge University Press.
67. Teune, Henry(1997).Stories, Observations, Systems, Theories.Comparative Social Research,16,73-83.
68. Tilly, Charles(1981).As Sociology Meets History.NY:Academic.
69. Tilly, Charles(1990).Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
70. Tilly, Charles(1997).Means and Ends of Comparison in Macrosociology.Comparative Social Research,16,43-53.
71. Tilly, Charles(1984).Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparison.NY:Russell Sage.
72. Tilly, Charles(1995).Macrosociology: Past and Future.Newsletter of the Comparative and Historical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association,8(1/2),1-4.
73. Tilly, Charles(1978).From Mobilization to Revolution.NY:Random House.
74. Wallerstein, Immanuel(1979).The Capitalist World-Economy.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
75. Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences (NY: The Free Press).
76. Weber, Max、黃振華譯、張興健譯(1991)。社會科學方法論。台北:時報。
77. Wetherell, Charles(1998).Historical Social Network Analysis.International Review of Social History,43(Supplement 6),125-144.
78. Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P.(1992).Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes since 1956.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
79. Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P.(1991).A Qualitative Comparative Approach to Latin American Revolutions.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,32(1-2),82-109.

1. 苗延威(2019)。纏足研究的經濟中心論：評Laurel Bossen and Hill Gates, Bound Feet, Young Hands: Tracking the Demise of Footbinding in Village China。近代中國婦女史研究，33，163-175。
2. 湯汶瑜,洪俊瑋,王俊元(2023)。警察總是權威式的領導嗎？從 QCA 方法析探改變警察領導風格之影響因素。文官制度季刊，15(1)，107-145。
3. (2018)。把歷史學帶進來：歷史社會學的跨學科想象與策略。社會理論學報，21(2)，379-401。