2004年香港立法會選舉候選人之競選文宣策略

An Explorative Study of Campaign Advertising Strategy in the 2004 Legislative Election in Hong Kong: A Functional Theory Approach

10.30075/TJER.200809.0003

鈕則勳(Tse-Hsun Niu)

競選文宣 ； 廣告功能論 ； 競選傳播策略 ； 選戰策略 ； 2004年香港立法會選舉 ； campaign communication ； political advertising ； the election in 2004 in Hong Kong ； campaign strategy ； the functional theory of political campaign discourse

選舉評論

5期（2008 / 09 / 01）

33 - 65

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討2004年香港立法會選舉，候選人之競選文宣策略。理論及文獻部分則是以競選廣告論述之功能論為基礎，綜合近年來國內外相關文獻與本研究案例進行討論。研究方法採內容分析法，以內容分析法分析研究者至香港觀選時所蒐集到之後選人競選文宣，觀察其競選策略。 本研究發現，以文宣功能來看，所蒐集到的文宣樣本中，正面多於負面，保守派及泛民主派相似；以主題來說，形象多於政策議題，各式主題文宣仍以正面文宣使用最多，泛民主派以形象為主，保守派形象議題文宣差不多。以政策議題來說，泛民主派較強調過去政績，保守派較強調未來施政計畫。值得一提的是，各派別候選人在塑造形象特質上有顯著差異。

This research focuses mainly on the campaign advertising strategies of candidates in the legislative election in 2004 in Hongkong. The case studied here is on the basis of the theories and literatures of the functional theory of political campaign discourse, and at the same time, it also synthesizes some relevant literature published these years. The study adopts content analysis method. By using the method, the study analyzes the campaign advertisements of candidates. According to the result, advertisements show more positive than negative ones. As for the topic of the advertisements, advertisements show more characters of the candidates than policies and issues. Both the two kinds of the advertisements show more positive than negative strategies. The advertisements of the pan-democracy appeal to the characters of the candidates. And the advertisements of the conservatives, they call on policies and issues. As far as the policies and issues are concerned, pan-democracy shows more positive deeds, and conservatives they appeal to some future plans. To sum up, there are significant differences between the pan-democracy and the conservatives on the character of its candidates.

1. Benoit, William L.(2000).A functional analysis of political advertising across media,1998.Communication Studies,51(3),274-295.
2. Benoit, William L.(1999).Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertising,1952-1996.Westport, CT:Praeger.
3. Benoit, William L.(2001).Presidential campaign rhetoric: Does it matter?.
4. Benoit, William L.,Airne, David(2005).Issue ownership for non-presidential television spots.Communication Quarterly,53(4),493-503.
5. Benoit, William L.,Airne, David(2005).Political television advertising in campaign 2000.Communication Quarterly,53(4),473-492.
6. Benze, J. G.,Declercq, E. R.(1985).Content of television political spot ads for female candidates.Journalism Quarterly,62,278-283.
7. Brazeal, L. M.,Benoit, W. L.(2001).A functional analysis of congressional television spots, 1986-2000.Communication Quarterly,49,436-454.
8. Denton, Robert E. (Ed.)(1998).The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective.Westport Conn:Praeger.
9. Devlin, L. P.(1989).Contrasts in presidential campaigning commercials of 1988.American Behavioral Scientist,32,389-414.
10. Diamond, E.,Bates, S.(1984).The Spots: The rise of political advertising on television.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
11. Hansen, Glenn J.,Benoit, William L.(2002).Presidential television advertising and public policy priorities, 1952-2000.Communication Studies,53(3),284-296.
12. Holsti, O. R.(1969).Content analysis for the social science and humanities.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
13. James, K. E.,Hensel, P. J.(1991).Negative advertising: The malicious strain of comparative advertising.Journal of Advertising,20,53-69.
14. Jamieson, K. H.(1989).Context and the creation of meaning in the advertising of the 1988 presidential campaign.American Behavioral Scientist,32,415-424.
15. Johnson-Cartee, K. S.,Copeland, G. A.(1993).Negative political advertising: Coming of age.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Johnston, A.,White, A. B.(1994).Communication styles and female candidates: A study of the political advertising during the 1986 Senate elections.Journalism Quarterly,71,321-329.
17. Joslyn, R. A.(1980).The content of political spot ads.Journalism Quarterly,57,92-98.
18. Kahn, Kim Fridkin,Kenney, Patrick J.(1999).The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
19. Kaid , Linda Lee,Johnston, A.(1991).Negative versus positive television advertising in U.S. presidential campaigns 1960-1988.Journal of Communications,41,53-64.
20. Lee, Cheolhan,Benoit ,William L.(2004).A functional analysis of presidential television spots: A comparison of Korean and American ads.Communication Quarterly,52(1),68-79.
21. Levine, M.A.(1995).Presidential campaigns and elections: Issues and images in the media age.Itasea, IL:Peacock.
22. Payne, J. G.,Baukus, R. A.(1988).Trend analysis of the 1984 GOP Senatorial spots.Political Communication and Persuasion,5,161-177.
23. Procter, D. E.,Schenck-Hamlin, W. J.(1996).Form and variations in negative political advertising.Communication Research Reports,13,147-159.
24. Wimmer, R. D.,Dominick, J. R.(1994).Mass media research: An introduction.Belmont, CA:Wadsorth Company.
25. 立法會選舉活動指引
26. 選舉事務
27. 鈕則勳(2007)。競選廣告策略與效果。台北:揚智。
28. 鈕則勳(2002)。競選傳播策略：理論與實務。台北:韋伯。
29. 黃智誠、李少南(2003)。香港的政治傳播研究。新聞學研究，74，1-17。
30. 2004年香港立法會選舉
31. 鄭自隆(2000)。2000年總統大選三組候選人電視廣告表現與文宣策略關聯性分析。「2000年總統選舉：傳播、行銷暨策略學術研討會」論文，台北:
32. 鄭自隆(2004)。競選傳播與台灣社會。台北:揚智。
33. 鄭自隆(1995)。競選廣告。台北:正中。
34. 學習時報網站

1. 鈕則勳(2012)。2009 年縣市長選舉候選人文宣功能分析。中國廣告學刊，17，41-66。