人格特質與脈絡績效關係之研究－以藥劑師爲例

The Relationship between Personality and Contextual Performance-A Study of Pharmacist

10.29916/JMPP.200703.0006

許志賢(Chih-Hsien Hsu)；劉慶湘(Ching-Hsiang Liu)；李鴻文(Hung-Wen Lee)；陳芬儀(Feng-Yi Chen)

人格特質 ； 脈絡績效 ； 藥劑師 ； Personality ； Contextual Performance ； Pharmacist

管理實務與理論研究

1卷1期（2007 / 03 / 01）

101 - 112

繁體中文

Personality has been widely discussed in HRM field. What kind of personality could drive human beings to help and cooperate with others, to support the core technique achieve higher task performance in organization has been interested to researchers. From previous researches indicated personality affects a person to support, approve and protect the goal of organization. There fore, this research adopt the Big Five Model from Costa and McCrac (1986) including Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and the contextual performance from Borman and Motowidlo (1993) to measure how the degree that the employee could support the core technique in organization. In data analysis, adopt the Pearson correlation and multiple-regression, to investigate the relationship between personality and contextual performance on pharmacist. The researchers found that Agreeableness is most correlated to contextual performance, correlation coefficient is 0.560, and predict the contextual performance up to 40.0%. The researchers recommend person with Agreeableness for recruiting pharmacist to increase contextual performance.

Personality has been widely discussed in HRM field. What kind of personality could drive human beings to help and cooperate with others, to support the core technique achieve higher task performance in organization has been interested to researchers. From previous researches indicated personality affects a person to support, approve and protect the goal of organization. There fore, this research adopt the Big Five Model from Costa and McCrac (1986) including Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and the contextual performance from Borman and Motowidlo (1993) to measure how the degree that the employee could support the core technique in organization. In data analysis, adopt the Pearson correlation and multiple-regression, to investigate the relationship between personality and contextual performance on pharmacist. The researchers found that Agreeableness is most correlated to contextual performance, correlation coefficient is 0.560, and predict the contextual performance up to 40.0%. The researchers recommend person with Agreeableness for recruiting pharmacist to increase contextual performance.

1. 中央健保局醫務管理
2. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會網站
3. 行政院衛生署衛生統計資訊網
4. 行政院衛生署90~93年度醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑合格名單
5. Allport, G. W.(1937).Personality: A Psychological Interpretation.New York:Holt.
6. Barrick, M. R.,M. R. Mount(1991).The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis.Personnel Psychology,44,1-26.
7. Borman, W. C.,Motowidlo, S. J.(1993).Personnel Selection in Organization.San Francisco:Josssey-Bass.
8. Cascio, W. F.(1991).Applied Psychology in Personnel Management.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
9. Cattell, R. B.(1943).The Description of Personality: Basic Trait Resolved into Clusters.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,38,476-506.
10. Fiske, D. W.(1949).Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,44,329-344.
11. Goldberg, L. R.(1990).Alternative Description of Personality? The Big Five Factor.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59,1216-1229.
12. McCrae R R.,Costa, P. T.(1992).The Introduction of the Five-Factor Model and Its Application.Journal of Personality,60,175-215.
13. McCrae, R. R.,Casta, P. T.,Busch, C. M.(1986).Evaluating Comprehensiveness in Personality System: The California Q-set and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of Personality,54,430-446.
14. Motowildo, S. J.,Van, S. J. R.(1994).Evidence that the task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,79,475-480.
15. Normal, W. T.(1963).Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,66,574-583.
16. Robbins, S. P.(1998).Organizational behavior: concepts, controversies, and application Upper Saddle River.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
17. Salgado, J. F.(2003).Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures.Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology,76(3),323-346.
18. Saucier, G.(1994).Mini-Marker: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers.Journal of personality Assessment,63(3),506-516.
19. Tett, R. P.,Jackson, D. N.,Rothstein, M, R.,John, R.(1999).Meta-Analysis of Bidirectional Relations in Personality-Job Performance Research.Human Performance,12(1),1-29.
20. Tupes, E. C.,Christal, R.E.(1961).Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings, Lackland Air Force Base.TX:Aeronautical Systems Division Personality Laboratory.
21. Wiggins, J. S.(1996).The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives.New York:Guilford Press.
22. 王銘傑(2004)。嘉義，南華大學管理科學研究所。
23. 王馨(2003)。臺南，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所。
24. 江錦樺(2001)。桃園，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
25. 余德成(1996)。高雄，國立中山大學企業管理研究所。
26. 吳秉恩(1991)。組織行爲學。台北:華泰書局。
27. 吳秉恩(2001)。分享式人力資源管理：理念、程序與實務。台北:翰蘆圖書。
28. 李青芬編譯、Stephen P. Robbins著(2002)。組織行爲學。台北:華泰文化。
29. 李秋慧(2003)。桃園，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
30. 林君怡(2004)。桃園，中原大學工業工程研究所。
31. 邱浩政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南圖書。
32. 徐英傑(2003)。嘉義，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
33. 談從藥師的社會功能談藥學教育
34. 張潤書(1989)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
35. 張潤書(1985)。組織行爲與管理。台北:五南圖書。
36. 許世軍(2000)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
37. 陳信岳(2001)。台中，靜宜大學企業管理學系。
38. 陳惠美(2003)。台北，大同大學事業經營研究所碩士在職專班。
39. 黃俊英(2000)。多變量分析。台北:中國經濟企業研究所。
40. 黃英忠(1997)。人力資源管理。台北:三民書局。
41. 黃英忠(2002)。現代管理學。台北:華泰書局。
42. 黃堅厚(1979)。國小及國中學生內外控信念之研究。教育心理學報，12，1-14。
43. 黃彩霖(2003)。嘉義，南華大學社會研究學所。
44. 葛樹人(1987)。心理測驗學。台北:桂冠圖書。
45. 潘蘇惠(2003)。桃園，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班。

1. 廖本裕、施孟隆、王榮貴(2010)。民宿經營者人格特質、領導能力、經營績效之研究－以台東縣為例。農業經營管理，16，1-20。
2. (2024)。薪水小偷！就決定是牠了－動物同事對工作績效影響之研究。Journal of Data Analysis，19(3)，16-39。