論排球團隊經營－以排球教練領導行爲、球隊凝聚力與球員滿意度爲例

A Discussion on the Volleyball Team Operation-Based on the Leadership Behavior of the Volleyball Coach, Coherence of the Ball Team and Level of Satisfaction of Player as Example

10.29916/JMPP.200709.0009

葉丁嘉(Ting-Chia Yeh)；朱益成(I-Cheng Chu)；吳忠政(Wu-Chung Cheng)

排球 ； 領導行爲 ； 凝聚力 ； 滿意度 ； Volleyball ； leadership behavior ； coherence ； level of satisfaction

管理實務與理論研究

1卷3期（2007 / 09 / 01）

139 - 152

繁體中文

本研究目的是要探討排球團隊經營情況，並且以排球教練的領導行爲、球隊的凝聚力與球員的滿意度爲探討內容。本研究以排球球員爲抽樣對象，實施時間從2007年5月1日至6月30日止，共發放200份問卷，有效回收率約爲66.50%。而研究資料是以SPSS統計軟體作爲統計分析的工具，將所收集到的填答資料以Cronbach's α進行信度分析，結果爲：一、排球隊中，教練領導方式、球隊管理模式、球隊凝聚力與球員滿意度彼此之間是相互影響的。二、除了教練領導方式外，其球隊管理模式、球隊凝聚力與球員滿意度間具有顯著的正相關。三、球隊或是球員的喜好皆偏向民主領導勝過於專制方式。

The purpose of this research is to conduct study on the operation of volleyball team and the content of study is based on the leadership behavior of the volleyball coach, the coherence of the ball team and the level of satisfaction of players. This research is based on volleyball player as the random sampling target and the implementation period was from May 1 to June 30, 2007. In total 200 questionnaires were issued and the effective recovery rate was 66.50%. The research information is based on SPSS statistical software as the statistical analysis tool. Cronbach's α is utilized on answers to questions collected to conduct creditability analysis. The results are: 1. In the volleyball team and between the leadership behavior of the volleyball coach, the ball team management form, the coherence of the ball team and the level of satisfaction of players, one can affect each other mutually. 2. Apart from the coach leadership behavior, between its ball team management form, the coherence of the ball team and the level of satisfaction of players, there is significant positive correlation. 3. The preference of ball team or player all tend towards democratic leadership more than autocratic method.

1. 李炯煌(2003)。教練領導行爲與選手內在動機之相關研究。體育學報，34，37-46。
   連結：
2. Carron, A. V.(1982).Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations and considerations.Journal of sport and exercise psychology,4,123-138.
3. Chelladurai, P.,Imamura, H.,Yamaguchi, Y. Oinuma.,Miyauchi, T.(1988).Sport leadership in a cross nation setting: The case of Japanese and Canadian University athletes.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,10,374-389.
4. Fiedler, F. E.(1967).A theory of leadership effectiveness.New York:McGraw-Hill.
5. Hodgetts, R. M.(1991).Organizational behavior: Theory and practice.N.Y.:Macmillian.
6. Lewin, K.,Lippitt, R.,White, R. K.(1939).Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimental Cheated Social Climates.Journal of Social Psychology,10,271-299.
7. 吳益盛(2005)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
8. 胡文雄、蔡崇濱(1997)。排球運動史話。臺南:供學出版社。
9. 莊豔惠(1997)。桃園，國立體育學院體育研究所。
10. 陳玉娟(1995)。桃園，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
11. 陳其昌(1993)。桃園，國立體育學院體育研究所。
12. 楊純碧(1998)。桃園，國立體育學院體育研究所。
13. 鄭松益(2001)。臺北，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
14. 盧俊宏(1994)。運動心理學。臺北:師大書苑。
15. 羅虞村(1989)。領導理論研究。臺北:文景書局。