創新特性對護理人員使用無線射頻辨識系統意圖傾向之影響：一階層模式與多階層模式之比較

The Influence of Innovation Characteristics to Nurse Staff Intention in Using RFID: Comparison with One-layer Model and Multi-layer Model

10.29916/JMPP.200812.0005

王嵩竑(Song-Hong Wang)

創新特性 ； 新接受度 ； 線射頻辨識技術 ； Innovation characteristics ； innovations ； radio frequency identification RFID

管理實務與理論研究

2卷4期（2008 / 12 / 01）

87 - 106

繁體中文

因「創新接受度」概念常被用以做爲解釋使用者對新科技接受程度之理論架構，故本研究以護理人員使用無線射頻辨識(RFID)系統此創新科技於護理作業爲主題，彙總學者創新特性觀點，提出八大創新特性影響使用意圖傾向之研究架構，對某已導入RFID醫院之護理人員爲對象進行實證，並提出多階層創新特性接受度模型，與過去相關研究所常用之一階層模式進行比較分析。研究結果顯示：(1)多階層創新特性接受度模式之配適度、提供資訊豐沛性、對使用意圖傾向變數之解釋能力，皆優於過去研究普遍採用之一階層模式。(2)一階層與多階層模式結果皆顯示，影響使用意圖傾向最主要的因素爲相容性與可試用性，其中相容性對使用意圖傾向有正向而顯著之關係，然可試用性對使用意圖傾向卻具負向而顯著之關係。

The concept of ”nnovationess” was often used as a theory construction to explain the acceptance of user to new technology, but most experimental searches used one-layer model, multi-layer model was distinct. So, this study selected RFID technology in nursing practice as our subject, to experiment the influence of innovation characteristics to nurse staff intention of using RFID. We construct multi-layer perceived innovation characteristics model and contrasted this concept with one-layer mode. Bases on 225 questionnaires, we get fellow results. First, adequacy for multi-layer innovationess model is better then one-layer model. Second, ”perceived ease of use”, ”image”, and ”result demonstrability” have indirect effort to ”behavioral intention to use”; ”relative advantage”, ”compatibility”, and ”visibility” are found positively related to ”behavioral intention to use”; but the relationship between ”perceived ease of use” and ”behavioral intention to use” is not obvious; and last, ”trialability” is found negatively related to ”behavioral intention to use”.

1. Agarwal, R.,Prasad, J.(1997).The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntaries in the Acceptance of Information Technologies.Decision Science,28(3),557-582.
2. Baumgartner, H.,Homburg, C.(1996).Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review.International Journal of Research in Marketing,13,139-161.
3. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.Management Sciences,35(8),982-1003.
4. Doll, W. J.,Xia, W.,Torkzadeh, G.(1994).A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-user Computing Satisfaction.MIS Quarterly,18,456-461.
5. Greer, T. H.,Murtaza, M. B.(2003).Web personalization: The impact of perceived innovation characteristics on the intention to use personalization.The Journal of Computer Information Systems,43(3),50-55.
6. Shrouds of time: The history of RFID, The Association for Automatic Identification and Data Capture Technologies (AIM)
7. Lee, Y.,Kozar, K.,T. Larsen, K. R.(2003).The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future.Communications of the Association for Information Systems,12(50),752-780.
8. Lundblad, J. P.(2003).A Review and Critique of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory as it applies to Organizations.Organization Development Journal,21(4),50-64.
9. Moore, G. C.,Benbasat, I.(1991).Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation.Information Systems Research,2(3),192-222.
10. Rogers, E. M.(1995).Diffusion of Innovations.New York:The Free Press.
11. Rogers, E. M.,Shoemaker, F. F.(1972).Communication of Innovations.New York:Glencoe, State University Press.
12. Sager, J. K.,Johnston, M. W.(1989).Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment: A Study of Salespeople.Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,9(1),30-41.
13. Slyke, G. V.,Lou, H.,Day, J.(2002).The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on Intention to Use Groupware.Information Resources Management Journal,15(1),5-12.
14. Tornatzky, L. G.,Klein, K. J.(1982).Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,29(1),28-43.
15. 王灝(2001)。台南，國立成功大學國際企業研究所。
16. 李岳縉(2004)。嘉義，國立中正大學資訊管理學系。
17. 李政儒(2004)。台北，臺北醫學大學醫學資訊研究所。
18. 佘建成(2004)。台北，國立陽明大學衛生資訊與決策研究所。
19. 周士傑(2006)。台北，淡江大學資訊管理學系。
20. 通訊雜誌
21. 張孟謙(2004)。臺北，國立臺北大學企業管理學系。
22. 空軍學術月刊雜誌
23. 郭景桓(2004)。嘉義，國立中正大學資訊管理學系。
24. 陳楚杰(2004)。臺北，國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所。
25. 黃齡逸(2005)。高雄，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所。
26. 楊載福(2004)。嘉義，國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所。
27. 廖御超(2006)。花蓮，國立東華大學企業管理學系。
28. DigiTimes企業IT雜誌
29. 歐詩婷(2002)。臺北，實踐大學企業管理研究所。
30. 蘇裕盛(2005)。臺北，淡江大學資訊管理學系。