题名

結合ISM與ANP探討消費者選擇購買自行車之決策因素

并列篇名

Integrating ISM and ANP to Analyze the Key Factors of Bicycle Purchasing

DOI

10.29916/JMPP.201306_7(2).0004

作者

葉子明(Tsu-Ming Yeh);謝佩伶(Pei-Ling Hsieh)

关键词

購買評估因素 ; 詮釋結構模式 ; 分析網路程序法 ; Purchase Evaluation factors ; ISM ; ANP

期刊名称

管理實務與理論研究

卷期/出版年月

7卷2期(2013 / 06 / 01)

页次

75 - 99

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

由於國內消費者之生活型態的改變與休閒生活品質的提升,自行車產品已由過去以代步工具的傳統角色,轉變成為流行、精品、品味、玩樂和運動的代名詞,自行車產品的各種附加配備和功能的創新發明不斷的推陳出新,以因應市場的多樣性及多變性的需求。再者,隨著消費者對產品需求已朝向個人化、多樣化的趨勢發展,如何了解各個消費族群的消費行為和對產品的偏好以及感覺認知的情形,是各個企業內部在產品開發之前所要先釐清的重要事宜,方能助於擬定新產品在銷售市場之適當的定位點上,以因應市場各個消費族群的需求。本研究探討消費者在購買自行車時所考慮的因素,同時瞭解不同屬性的使用者對於自行車的偏好差異。本研究以行銷影響因素、心理影響因素、社會影響因素及狀況影響因素之四個評估構面及10個評估準則來找出使用者對於四種購買自行車的影響因素,利用詮釋結構模式法(Interpretive Structural Modeling, ISM)找出各項構面之間的準則關聯結構,再利用分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)來找出準則之間的權重關係,最後找出目前消費者在購買各種不同自行車距離使用者心目中理想解的差距。

英文摘要

Due to the changes in consumer lifestyles and the improvement in quality of leisure life of consumers in the country, bicycle products have become, from the tradition role as means of transportation, to a synonym for prevalence, luxury goods, taste, entertainment, and sport. The variety of additional equipment and functions of bicycle products has continued to introduce new innovations in response to the diversity and variability of the demand in the market. Moreover, as trends in consumer demands are headed towards personalization and diversification, the understanding of different consumer groups in consuming behaviors, product preferences and perceptions are important factors before product development within the enterprises. New products could therefore be pinpointed properly in the market to meet market demands from different consumer groups. This research aims to investigate factors consumers take into considerations upon purchasing bicycles while identifying bicycle preferences of variety of users. The research incorporates four assessment dimensions, marketing factor, psychological factors, social factors and situational factors, and ten assessment criteria to determine the four influencing factors that users have when purchasing bicycles. The research also applies ISM (Interpretive Structural Modeling) to identify the association between each dimension in criterion structures. Additionally, ANP is employed to determine weighing relations between the criteria. ANP (Analytic Network Process) approach is also utilized to identify measure of ”closeness” to ”ideal” solution of current consumers in purchasing different bicycles.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 王麗幸、謝玲芬(2009)。結合ISM與ANP建構知識管理系統評估模式。管理與系統,16(2),219-241。
    連結:
  2. 許雅惠(2008)。台北,世新大學圖文傳播暨數位出版學研究所。
    連結:
  3. Afonso, P.,Nunes, M.,Paisana, A.,Braga, A.(2008).The influence of time-to-market and target costing in the new product development success.International Journal of Production Economics,115,559-568.
  4. Agarwal, A.,Shankar, R.,Tiwari, M. K.(2007).Modeling agility of supply chain.Industrial Marketing Management,36,443-457.
  5. Chen, Y. S.,Lin, M. J.,Chang, C. H.(2009).Technological innovations and industry clustering in the bicycle industry in Taiwan.Technology in Society,31,207-217.
  6. Cheng, B.,Xianhua, W.(2005).Portfolio and consumption decisions with the consumption habit constraints.Science Direct,63,2335-2346.
  7. Cheng, C. H.,Tzeng, G. H.(2011).Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials.Expert Systems with Applications,38,12168-12179.
  8. Engel, J. F.,Kollat, D. T.,Blackwell, R. D.(1982).Consumer Behavior (4th Ed.).Chicago:Dryden.
  9. Howard, J. A.(1994).Buyer behavior in marketing strategy.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  10. Howard, J. A.,Sheth, J. N.(1969).The Theory of Buyer Behavior.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  11. Huang, J. J.(2005).Multidimensional data in Multidimensional Scaling using the Analysis network process.Science Direct,26,755-767.
  12. Kanna, G.,Haq, A. N.(2008).Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modeling and analytic hierarchy process.International Journal of Management and Decision Making,9(2),82-163.
  13. Kotler, P.(1997).Marketing Management: Analysis Planning Implementation and Control.N.Y.:Prentice Hall, Inc..
  14. Nicolas, G. N.,Lara, B. M.(2007).Mountain Biking-Related Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments in the United States.The American Journal of Sports Medicine,39(2),404-409.
  15. Nicosia, F. M.(1996).Consumer decision process, marketing and advertising implication.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  16. Olsen, S. A.(Ed.)(1982).Group Planning and Problem Solving Methods in Engineering.
  17. Ravi, V.,Shankar, R.(2005).Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end of life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach.Computers & Industrial Engineering,48(2),56-327.
  18. Saaty, T. L.(1996).Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process.Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publication.
  19. Saaty, T. L.,Takizawa, M.(1986).Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks.European Journal of Operational Research,26,229-237.
  20. Schiffman, L. G.,Kanuk, L. F.,MeCarthy, L. F.,Green, L.(1983).Effects of Time Compression on Attitudes and Information Processing.Journal of Marketing,47,79-85.
  21. Senecal, S.,Kalczynski, P. J.,Nantel, J.(2005).Consumers' decision-making process and theironline shopping behavior: A click stream analysis.Journal of Business Research,58(11),1599-1608.
  22. Seo, D.,Ranganathan, C.,Babad, Y.(2008).Two-level model of customer retention in the US mobile telecommunications service market.Telecommunication Policy,32(3/4),182-196.
  23. Tazki, E.,Amagsa, M.(1979).Structural modeling in a class of systems using fuzzy sets theory.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2(1),87-103.
  24. Wang, W. P.(2009).Evaluating new product development performance by fuzzy linguistic computing.Expert Systems with Applications,36,9759-9766.
  25. Warfield, J. N.(1990).Interpretive Structural Modeling and Related Work: Annotated Bibliography.Fairfax, Virginia:IASIS, George Mason University.
  26. Warfield, J. N.(1974).Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,4(5),405-417.
  27. Warfield, J. N.(1973).Binary Matrices in System Modeling, IEEE Transactions on Systems.Man, and Cybernetics,3(5),441-449.
  28. Warfield, J. N.(1973).On Arranging Elements of a Hierarchy in Graphic Form.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,3(2),121-132.
  29. Warfield, J. N.,Ayiku, M. N. B.(1989).Sociotechnical Modeling for Developing Nations.Systems & Cybernetics in Management,18(1-2),25-40.
  30. Wei, R.(2008).Motivations for using the mobile phone for mass communications and entertainment.Telematics and Informatics,25(1),36-46.
  31. Wu, W. W.(2008).Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and ISM approach.Expert Systems with Applications,35,828-835.
  32. 石怡芬(2004)。高雄,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所。
  33. 朱嘉雯(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士在職專班。
  34. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2008)。挑戰2008國家重點發展計畫。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  35. 吳任中(2006)。桃園,中原大學企業管理研究所。
  36. 李莉娟(2006)。台中,亞洲大學國際企業系。
  37. 李麗華(2006)。台北,銘傳大學設計管理研究所在職專班。
  38. 阮素琴(2003)。專訪巨大集團總裁─劉金標談巨大願景。自行車市場快訊,89,42-44。
  39. 林書豪(2010)。桃園,國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
  40. 林素蘭(2005)。桃園,中原大學企業管理研究所。
  41. 林軒正(2001)。新竹,國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系。
  42. 施俊佑(2008)。台南,長榮大學運動休閒管理學系。
  43. 張國雄(2007)。行銷管理。台北:雙葉書廊。
  44. 陳仕煥(1997)。新竹,國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
  45. 陳宏慈(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄,義守大學資訊管理學系。
  46. 黃泓傑(2005)。彰化,大葉大學事業經營研究所。
  47. 黃振欽(2009)。台中,靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班。
  48. 黃慶忠(2008)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學會計學系。
  49. 楊文壽(2000)。新竹,國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
  50. 蔡陽明(2010)。台中,靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班。
  51. 謝明芳(2009)。台南,致遠管理學院工業管理學系研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 黃怡敏、張曉楨、施光訓(2016)。建立教師甄選評量機制系統之研究。績效與策略研究,13(2),19-44。
  2. 簡全亮、林聯喜、周宇輝(2016)。國民運動中心OT 委外可行性評估架構分析。臺大體育學報,30,11-21。
  3. 鍾政偉(2020)。以資源基礎理論建立休閒漁業發展策略之研究。休閒產業管理學刊,13(2),19-44。
  4. 鍾政偉,蔡恩祈,蔡宜吟,張文仁,孫憶涵,石沛澐(2021)。以心流理論建構手作體驗發展策略之研究。Journal of Data Analysis,16(3),1-27。
  5. (2015)。以ISM 與AHP 探討時尚指甲彩繪設計元素。樹德科技大學學報,17(1),101-115。