题名

初產婦母嬰共照與母嬰分照對母育能力及照護品質之比較分析

并列篇名

An Analysis on the Maternal Competence and Quality of Care for Primiparas in Couplet Care Compared to Rooming-in Nursing

DOI

10.29916/JMPP.202212_16(2).0010

作者

林玉純(Yu-Chun Lin);葉德豐(Te-Feng Yeh);張炳華(Bin-Wha Chang);馮兆康(Chao-Kang Feng)

关键词

初產婦 ; 母嬰共照 ; 母嬰分照 ; 母育能力 ; 照護品質 ; Primipara ; couplet care ; rooming-in nursing ; maternal competence ; quality of care

期刊名称

管理實務與理論研究

卷期/出版年月

16卷2期(2022 / 12 / 01)

页次

150 - 164

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目的:分析初產婦實施母嬰分照和母嬰共照不同照護模式下對母育能力與照護品質之影響。方法:採便利取樣、橫斷式研究、以臺中市某區域教學醫院產後病房實施親子同室之初產婦,以問卷進行資料收集。問卷發放150份,有效回收137份,回收率91.33%。結果:初產婦實施親子同室照護且在母嬰共照下,母育能力平均分數3.23±0.52分、照護品質平均分數4.23±0.52分及醫療政策與人員支持度平均分數3.89±0.57分;母嬰分照下母育能力平均分數3.16±0.62分、照護品質平均分數4.00±0.60分及醫療政策與人員支持度平均分數3.69±0.62分。兩組結果相較下母嬰共照在照護品質高於母嬰分照之照護(p<.05),母育能力以及醫療政策與人員支持度較母嬰分照好,但是尚未達統計意義。結論:母嬰共照模式有較高之照護品質,母嬰共照模式在未來的臨床照護是值得推行的。但是是否提升母育能力則有待將來增加樣本數來驗證。

英文摘要

Objectives: Analyzing the effects on maternal competence and the quality of care under the different care models of primipara's implementation of couplet care and rooming-in nursing. Methods: Using convenient sampling, cross-sectional research, and primiparous women in the postpartum ward of a regional teaching hospital in Taichung were used to collect data using questionnaires. 150 questionnaires were issued and 137 were effectively received, with a received rate of 91.33%. Results: The average score of maternal competence for primiparas who implemented parent-child care in the same room under couplet care was 3.23±0.52, the average score of care quality was 4.23±0.52, and the average score of medical policy and staff support was 3.89±0.57; The average score of maternal competence under rooming-in nursing was 3.16±0.62, the average score of care quality was 4.00±0.60, and the average score of medical policy and personnel support was 3.69±0.62. Comparing the results of the two groups, the quality of care for couplet care is higher than that of rooming-in nursing care (p<.05), maternal competence, and medical policy and staff support are better than those of couplet care, but it has not yet reached statistical significance. Conclusions: The couplet care model has a high quality of care. Therefore, the couplet care model is worthy of implementation in clinical care. However, it is necessary to promotes maternal competence by increasing the number of samples to confirm in the future.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 郭淑芬,陳月枝,毛新春,鄒國英(2000)。個別性護理指導對初產婦新生兒照顧認知及母親自信度成效之探討。護理研究,8(2),152-164。
    連結:
  2. 廖茂宏,林羡咪,湯淑貞,楊文惠,程詩茹,鄧森文(2016)。以服務知覺差異探討母嬰親善措施對產婦純母乳哺育意向之影響。醫務管理期刊,17(2),97-114。
    連結:
  3. Cottrell, B. H.,Grubbs, L. M.(1994).Women's satisfaction with couplet care nursing compared to traditional postpartum care with rooming‐in.Research in Mursing & Health,17(6),401-409.
  4. Janssens, K.,Grevesse, L.,Clercx, A.,Claesen, M.,Haelterman, G.(2019).Advancement of promoting developmental care in belgium.Developmental Observer,12(1),9-9.
  5. Klemming, S.,Lilliesköld, S.,Westrup, B.(2021).Mother‐Newborn couplet care from theory to practice to ensure zero separation for all newborns.Acta Paediatrica,110(11),2951-2957.
  6. Romano, M.,Cacciatore, A.,Giordano, R.,La Rosa, B.(2010).Postpartum period: Three distinct but continuous phases.Journal of Prenatal Medicine,4(2),22-25.
  7. Stelwagen, M.,van Kempen, A.,Westmaas, A.,Vet, E.,Scheele, F.(2021).Parents’ experiences with a model of integrated maternity and neonatal care designed to empower parents.Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing,50(2),181-192.
  8. Wilkerson, N. N.,Barrows, T. L.(1988).Synchronizing care with mother-baby rhythms.MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing,13(4),264-268.
  9. 內政部統計處(2020,6 月 10 日)。現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記。取自https://www1.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=4693&mp=3
  10. 王雅香,林雅惠,侯惠足,陳淑娟,陳繪竹(2011)。提升 24 小時母嬰同室執行率之改善方案。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,10(1),78-89。
  11. 王麗君(2001)。改善新生兒照護諮詢服務方案。護理雜誌,48(3),55-63。
  12. 林麗珠,李從業,郭素珍,穆佩芬,許洪坤(2004)。產婦接受母嬰同室護理的生活經驗。護理雜誌,51(1),35-44。
  13. 高美玲,許淳森,陳昭惠(2004)。衛生署國民健康局補助計劃衛生署國民健康局補助計劃,衛生署國民健康局。
  14. 張靖梅,林獻鋒(2009)。產婦實施 24 小時親子同室之壓力經驗。長庚護理,20(4),429-440。
  15. 梁慧婷(2013)。臺中市,東海大學工業工程與經營資訊學系。
  16. 馮容莊(1992)。產科母嬰同室護理式之運用與評值。榮總護理,9(4),419-426。
  17. 蔡永蓮,黃鈴珠,黃瓊慧(2011)。提升 24 小時親子同室率方案。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌,10(6),77-86。
  18. 衛生福利部全民健康保險署(2020,1 月 2 日)。全民健康保險醫療服務給付項目及支付標準。資料取自:https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=58ED9C8D8417D00B
  19. 衛生福利部國民健康署(2016,6月1日)。醫病共享決策。資料取自:https://sdm.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Public/Detail?sn=32&id=1035
  20. 魏婉華,尤明如,賴妃珍(2014)。提升嬰兒室護理人員母嬰照護能力專案。彰化護理,21(2),42-50。