技術學院會計學原則導向教材設計與實驗

A Design and Experiment for Principle-based Teaching Materials for Accounting at Colleges of Technology in Taiwan

10.6481/JTR.201006.0073

王興芳(Hsing-Fang Wang)；陳美紀(Mei-Chi Chen)；許連中(Lian-Chung Sheu)

交易導向 ； 原則導向 ； 會計學教材 ； principle-based ； transaction-based ； teaching materials for accounting

教科書研究

3卷1期（2010 / 06 / 15）

73 - 107

繁體中文

本研究針對技術學院學生會計學教材設計與學習，以會計學教材重編為研究主題，瞭解會計學「原則導向」教材設計對學生學習成效的影響。159位技術學院一年級學生參與本次準實驗研究，研究者以二因子共變數分析研究資料，結果顯示會計學「原則導向」教材設計的認知學習成效優於傳統「交易導向」教材，證明「原則導向」教材，應有助於提昇學生對會計觀念、原理和原則的應用與分析整合能力。對低學習成就組學生而言，會計學「原則導向」教材設計的學習成效亦顯著高於傳統「交易導向」教材，此一研究發現對會計教育工作而言，係一大佳音，因為如何有效提昇低學習成就者之學習成效，一向是十分具價值性之教學議題。最後針對以上研究發現，本研究對會計教學、教材及未來研究提出建議。

The purpose of this study was to design principle-based teaching materials for accounting and evaluate the learning effects. The participants were 159 freshmen from two colleges of technology. Findings indicate the principle- based teaching materials for accounting gained significantly higher performance than the transaction-based teaching materials for accounting, which means the principle-based teaching materials were useful in developing student accounting concepts, as well as analysis and integration skills. For low achievement students, we also found the principle-based teaching materials gained significantly higher performance than the transaction-based teaching materials. This finding was valuable for accounting teachers because improving the performance of low achievement students was a very important issue for them. Based on these findings, the researcher provided further discussion and suggestions for future accounting education and research.

1. 賴宛瑜（2005，5 月22 日）。高職念過的，科大又重上。聯合報，15 版
2. 教育部（2009）。大專院校概況統計。2009 年7 月5 日，取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/publication.aspx?publication_sn=1197
3. Atkinson, R. K.,Derry, S. J.,Renkl, A.,Wortham, D.(2000).Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research.Review of Educational Research,70(2),181-214.
4. Birkmire, D. P.(1985).Text processing: The influence of text structure, background knowledge, and purpose.Reading Research Quarterly,20,314-326.
5. Boyd, F. B.,Ikpeze, C. H.(2007).Navigating a literacy landscape: Teaching conceptual understanding with multiple text types.Journal of Literacy Research,39(2),217-248.
6. Bruner, J. S.(1960).The process of education.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
7. Chi, M. T.,Feltovich, P. J.,Glaser, R.(1981).Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science,5,121-152.
8. Chiesi, H. L.,Spilich, G. J.,Voss, J. F.(1979).Acquisiton of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18(3),257-273.
9. Davidson, R. A.,Baldwin, B. A.(2005).Cognitive skills objectives in intermediate accounting textbooks: Evidence from end-of-chapter material.Journal of Accounting Education,23(2),79-95.
10. Gobeil, J.,Phillips, F.(2001).Relating case presentation style and level of student knowledge to fact acquisition and application in accounting case analyses.Issues in Accounting Education,16(2),205-222.
11. Godshalk, V. M.,Harvey, D. M.,Moller, L.(2004).The role of learning tasks on attitude change using cognitive flexibility hypertext systems.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(4),507-526.
12. Hassall, T.,Milne, M. J.(2004).Using case studies in accounting education.Accounting Education,13(2),135-138.
13. Issitt, J.(2004).Reflections on the study of textbooks.History of Education,33(6),683-696.
14. Keating, P. J.,Jablonsky, S. F.(1990).Changing roles of financial management: Getting close to the business.Morristown, NJ:Financial Executives Research Foundation.
15. Lima, M.,Koehler, M. J.,Spiro, R. J.(2004).Collaborative interactivity and integrated thinking in Brazilian business schools using cognitive flexibility hypertexts: The panteon project.Journal of Educational Computing Research,31(4),371-406.
16. Lundeberg, M. A.(1987).Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: Studying understanding in legal case analysis.Reading Research Quarterly,22,407-432.
17. McFall, R.(2005).Electronic textbooks that transform how textbooks are used.The Electronic Library,23(1),72-81.
18. Milne, M. J.,Mcconnell, P. J.(2001).Problem-based learning: A pedagogy for using case material in accounting education.Accounting Education,10(1),61-82.
19. Patten, R.,Williams, D.(1990).There's trouble-right here in our accounting programs: The challenge to accounting educators.Issues in Accounting Education,5,175-179.
20. Phillips, B. J.,Phillips, F.(2007).Sink or skim: Textbook reading behaviors of introductory accounting students.Issues in Accounting Education,22(1),21-44.
21. Richardson, P.(2002).Introductory textbooks and plagiarism in higher education: A case study from economics.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA.:
22. Saudagaran, S. M.(1996).The first course in accounting: An innovative approach.Issues in Accounting Education,11(1),83-94.
23. Spiro, R. J.,Coulson, R. L.,Feltovich, P. J.,Anderson, D. K.(2004).Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Theoretical models and processes of reading,Newark, DE:
24. Spiro, R. J.,Feltovich, P. J.,Jacobson, M. J.,Coulson, R. L.(1991).Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology,31(5),24-33.
25. Taba, H.(1962).Curriculum development: Theory and practice.New York:John Wiley.
26. Tobias, S.(1994).Interest, prior knowledge, and learning.Review of Educational Research,64,37-54.
27. Tyler, R. W.(1949).Basic principles of curriculum and instruction.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
28. Voss, J. F.,Vesonder, G. T.,Spilich, G. J.(1980).Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,19,651-667.
29. Vruwink, D. R.,Knoeber, B. L.(1997).Blockbuster video.Issues in Accounting Education,12(2),513-519.
30. Weygandt, J. J.,Kieso, D. E.,Kimmel, P. D.(2002).Financial accounting.New York:John Wiley.
31. Williams, D.(1991).The challenge of change in accounting education.Issues in Accounting Education,Spring,126-133.
32. Wineberg, S. S.(1991).On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy.American Educational Research Journal,28,395-455.
33. 王思峰、李昌雄(2004)。探索學習者建構行為特質對線上學習成效的影響。教育與心理研究，27(1)，117-157。
34. 李宗黎、林蕙真(2000)。會計學新論。臺北市:新陸。
35. 李隆盛(2002)。技職一貫課程與學校課程模擬。技術與職業教育雙月刊，70。
36. 林清山(2000)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
37. 陳品華(2004)。融入式介入方案對技職大學生自我調整學習之影響研究。教育與心理研究，27(1)，159-180。
38. 鄭丁旺(2001)。中級會計學。臺北市:宜增。
39. 饒達欽(1995)。重建技職教育課程的藍天。教改通訊，6，26-27。

1. 廖錦文、邱垂昌、田麗珠(2018)。結合多媒體與概念圖教材設計對認知學習效果之研究：以認知負荷為中介變項。數位學習科技期刊，10(1)，95-126。
2. 林志哲,王智瑩(2021)。心智圖融入會計學課程對技術型高中學生學習動機及學習成效之影響。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，52(1)，75-96。
3. 魏良丞、邱垂昌、田麗珠(2018)。以質性方法探討色彩概念圖對於學習成效與學習者感受之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，32(2)，35-55。