题名

韓國中小學教科書制度探析

并列篇名

School Textbook Policy and System in Korea

DOI

10.6481/JTR.201412_7(3).02

作者

張嘉育(Chia-Yu Chang)；文貞喜(Jung-Hee Moon)

关键词

教科書制度 ； 數位教科書 ； 韓國教育 ； 比較教育 ； school textbooks system ； digital textbook ； Korean education ； comparative education

期刊名称

教科書研究

卷期/出版年月

7卷3期（2014 / 12 / 15）

页次

33 - 65

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文旨在探討韓國中小學教科書制度之演變、現況，並析論其特色與問題。藉由文件與文獻分析，研究發現韓國中小學教科書制度具有下列特色：（一）採國定、審定與認定三軌並存，過去偏重國定制，現逐漸偏重認定制；（二）因應不同教育階段之屬性與需求，國小以國定制為主，國高中以審定制為主，專門高中則以認定及國定制為主；（三）政府主動介入教科書定價並採低價政策；（四）近來大力推動數位教科書以營造適性學習環境。但隨著認定制的快速發展、教科書價格自由化以及數位教科書的如火如荼推動，其教科書制度也面對若干問題：（一）認定教科書成長過快，品質出現疑慮；（二）教科書價格自由化後，書價節節攀升；（三）歷史審定教科書內容因意識型態之爭，屢引發爭議；（四）數位教科書成效未如預期，如何提升教師接受度並促進教學尚待努力。
英文摘要

The aims of this study were to investigate the evolution and current situation system of school textbooks in Korea as well as analyze its characteristics and problems. Using documentary analysis and literature review, this study found the following features in Korean’s school textbook system: (a) a coexisting centralized textbook publishing system, review system, and approval system that coexist as well as a shift from the centralized textbook system to the approval system; (b) to deal with the different characteristics of and needs in each stage of education, elementary school textbooks are determined primarily by the national government, in secondary education, they are determined by the review system, and textbooks used in vocational education are determined primarily by approval system and the national government; (c) government is involved in textbook pricing, buying the least expensive textbooks; (d) the government has been promoting digital textbook policy in recent years. Of course, some challenges and problems need to be resolved. They are (a) as approve system has been developing too fast, textbook quality concerns have been raised; (b) after textbook price liberalization, textbook prices have risen sharply; (c) due to different ideologies, the content of history textbooks have repeatedly sparked controversy; (d) since digital textbooks have not been as effectiveness as expected, more effort is needed to enhance teacher acceptance and to promote effective teaching of digital textbooks.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 김오수(2014). 교과서 값 `최고 상한제 `도입을. 에서 검색http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/.newsview.php?aid=2014022078501
  2. 교육부(2009). 미래형 교과서 정책 토론회 개최: 교과서 발전방향,교과서편찬,가격 결정 및 채택,공급 제도등.
  3. 教育部國教司（2007，4 月26 日）。「一綱多本」與「一綱一本」的分析。教育部電子報，253。取自http://epaper.edu.tw/e9617_epaper/topical.aspx?period_num=253&topical_sn=55&page=1
  4. 한국교과서연구재단(2013). 2013 년도 인정도서 심의의원 연수 교재.
  5. 楊國揚（2012，3 月15 日）。從媒體投書淺論教科書審定制度。國家教育研究院電子報，36。取自http://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=36&content_no=954
  6. 홍후조(2010). 교과서 가격자율화 와 교과서 개발 정책의 방향. 한국 교과서연구재단.홍후조(2010). 교과서 가격자율화 와 교과서 개발 정책의 방향. 한국 교과서연구재단.,未出版
  7. 尹皙萬（2014，3 月24 日）。政府要求降低教科書價格遭出版社拒絕。韓國中央日報中文網。取自 http://chinese.joins.com/big5/article.do?method=detail&art_id=117269
  8. 매일경제(2014).〔사설〕교과서 값 73% 폭등하자 직권조정 도입한 정부.에서 검색 http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2014&no=223709
  9. 교육부(2010). 2010 년교과서선진화방안 발표.
  10. 윤현진(2013). 교과서 검정 심사 체제 개선방안. 한국 교과서 연구재단윤현진(2013). 교과서 검정 심사 체제 개선방안. 한국 교과서 연구재단,未出版
  11. 조철현(2014). 교과서 전쟁, 그리고 역사의 퇴보. 에서 검색http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JG21&newsid=01797446606019384&DCD=A00702&OutLnkChk=Y
  12. (2013).고교 한국사 교과서 검정 통과부터 최종 승인까지.뉴시스
  13. 교육과학기술부(2011). 인정도서 업무 매뉴얼.
  14. 심수련(2014). 교육부 정관, 교과서 가격 직권조정추진. 에서 검색http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/NewsView.do?SEARCH_NEWS_CODE=2804211&ref=A.KBS NEWS
  15. 駐韓代表處教育組（2014，4 月3 日）。韓國政府與書商價格談不攏 學生開學至今無書可讀。教育部電子報，608。取自http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=14920
  16. 楊國揚（2007）。教科書制度與政策變革。取自http://www.edu-2.org/edu2/modules/article/sel.php?aid=540
  17. (2014).교과서 가격 조정 명령제 도입된다.뉴시스
  18. 교육부(2011). 인정도서 업무 매뉴얼.
  19. 한병규(2013). 고교 한국사 교과서 수정·보완일지. 에서 검색http://www.ajunews.com/view/20131210114717520
  20. Kim, J. H.-Y.,Jung, H.-Y.(2010).South Korean digital textbook project.Computers in the Schools,27(3-4),247-265.
  21. Korean Educational Development Institute(2011).Brief understanding of Korean educational policy.Seoul, Korea:Korean Educational Development Institute.
  22. Korean Educational Development Institute(2009).Understanding Korean educational policy: Curriculum and textbook policy.Seoul, Korea:Korean Educational Development Institute.
  23. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(2007).2007 Adapting education to the information age.Seoul, Korea:Author.
  24. Seo, J.-Y.,Kim, H.-S.,Lee, Y.-G.(2012).The effects of textbook policy changes: Are we moving towards high-quality and diverse textbooks?.Seoul, Korea:Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  25. Sim, J.-H.,Yoon, J.-H.,Park, J.-H.,Choi, S.-G.(2011).Quality management method of government-approved textbooks according to the 2010 textbook improvement plans.Seoul, Korea:Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  26. Taizan, Y.,Bhang, S.,Kurokami, H.,Kwon, S.(2012).A comparison of functions and the effects of digital textbook in Japan and Korea.International Journal for Educational Media and Technology,6(1),85-93.
  27. 금용한(2008).한국의 교과서 제도 와 그 개선방향.교과서 연구,53,42-47.
  28. 김만곤(2013).인정도서심의회의 구성과 역할.?? ??? ????.
  29. 김재춘(2011).,????? ????.
  30. 김형철(2014).인정도서 정책의 성과와 과제.교과서연구
  31. 박진용,이명준,차조일(2013).,?? ???????.
  32. 陳清溪(2005)。升學考試科目不宜實施一綱多本教科書。研習資訊，22(3)，7-17。
  33. 서지영,임찬빈,김정효(2013).인정 교과서 정책 개선 방안.?????????.
  34. 송인발(2010).우리나라 국 검정도서의 인정화 와 전망.교과서 연구 제,60,4-10.
  35. 전미희(2013).고교 한국사 교과서 검정 과정과 결과.한국 교과서연구재단
  36. 조난심(2005).초등학교.국정 교과서 검정화 방안에 대한 공청회 자료집
  37. 監察院(2009)。教科書「一綱一本」及「一綱多本」問題之探討專案調查研究報告。臺北市:作者。
  38. 藍順德(2006)。教科書政策與制度。臺北市:五南。
被引用次数
  1. 洪雯柔(2015)。韓國眼中的臺灣意象─韓國中學社會領域教科書與《朝鮮日報》的分析與反思。教科書研究，8(3)，37-75。
  2. 鄭雅双,陳浩然,郭亭吟,林欣儀(2020)。東北亞四國英語教育政策之比較。教育科學研究期刊，65(1)，1-26。
print cancel