互動式電子教科書對高中原住民專班閱讀理解成效影響之研究

Effects of Interactive Electronic Textbooks on the Reading Comprehension Among High School Aboriginal Students

10.6481/JTR.201508_8(2).04

黃思華(Tzu-Hua Huang)；劉遠楨(Yuan-Chen Liu)

電子教科書 ； 閱讀理解 ； Oxford教學模式 ； 原住民專班 ； electronic textbooks ； reading comprehension ； Oxford teaching model ； aboriginal student classes

教科書研究

8卷2期（2015 / 08 / 15）

107 - 137

繁體中文

電子教科書指文本內容是電子化的，且透過電子螢幕來呈現；電子教科書具有重複使用的功能，可以像磚塊一樣，架構起課程的內容，目前有愈來愈被廣泛使用的趨勢。本研究以花蓮縣某高中原住民專班一年級學生為對象，在原住民族文化課程以自行開發的電子教科書進行教學，教學內容共有三篇文本，分別是《前進部落》、《一段阿美族的故事》和《真正的人》。實驗組採Oxford所提預測、瀏覽、掃描、推論、猜測不熟悉的語詞和自我檢視六個步驟在電腦教室進行教學；控制組採傳統閱讀文本和撰寫心得的方式也在電腦教室進行教學。研究結果發現，經過三個文本的教學後，實驗組學生閱讀理解成效顯著優於控制組的學生。進一步分析實驗組在Oxford教學模式六個步驟的表現發現，原住民高中生在預測、瀏覽、掃描表現較佳；而在猜測不熟悉的語詞感到最困難，無法根據上、下文猜測字詞的意思。

The term ＂electronic textbooks＂ refers to electronic content presented on electronic screens. They are remote and are reusable. As such, electronic textbooks can be easily adapted to the classroom. Course elements can be introduced as if one were laying a brick wall, starting from the bottom and built up until a complete structure is eventually formed. Adapting electronic textbooks into course design has become a global trend. The present study targeted a group of aboriginal students in a Hualien County high school. Three aboriginal stories, Entry of the Aboriginal Tribe, A Legend of Ami, and The Real Person, were adapted and rewritten. The experimental group used the Oxford teaching model which includes six steps of instruction: predict, browse, scan, infer, guess the meaning of unfamiliar words, and self-evaluate. The control group read texts using traditional methods. Both groups of students were taught in computer classrooms and self-reported in written form. The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the reading comprehension test. Test results showed that aboriginal students performed better in predicting, browsing, and scanning; however, some may have encountered difficulties in guessing unfamiliar words in the text.

1. 黃友亭、辜玉旻(2013)。結合自我解釋的閱讀策略教學對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。課程與教學季刊，16(2)，135-160。
   連結：
2. 趙貞怡(2013)。原住民學童在電腦樂高機器人課程中的創造力與團隊合作能力。教育實踐與研究，26(1)，33-62。
   連結：
3. Baker, L.,Wigfield, A.(1999).Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement.Reading Research Quarterly,34,452-477.
4. Bennett, C. I.(1986).Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
5. Castles, A.,Coltheart, M.(2014).Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?.Cognition,91,77-111.
6. Chen, G. -D.,Wei, F. -H.,Wang, C. -Y.,Lee, J. -H.(2007).Extending e-book with contextual knowledge recommender for reading support on a web-based learning system.International Journal on E-Learning,6(4),605-622.
7. Connell, C.,Bayliss, L.,Farmer, W(2012).Effects of e-books readers and tablet computers on reading comprehension.International Journal of Instructional Media,39(2),131-140.
8. Cutting, L. E.,Scarborough, H. S.(2006).Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured.Scientific Studies of Reading,10(3),277-299.
9. Daniel, D. B.,Woody, W. D.(2013).E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts.Computer & Education,62,18-23.
10. Gilani, M. R. A.,Ismail, H. N.,Gilakjani, A. P.(2012).Impacts of learning reading strategy on students' reading comprehension proficiency.The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World,1(1),78-95.
11. Grellet, F.(1986).Developing reading skills.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
12. Howard, S.(Ed.)(1998).Wired up.London, UK:UCL Press.
13. Jones, T.,Brown, C.(2011).Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom.International Journal of Instruction,4(2),5-22.
14. Kern, R.(1989).Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability.Modern Language Journal,73,135-149.
15. Korat, O.,Shamir, A.(2012).Direct and indirect teaching: Using e-books for supporting vocabulary, word reading, and story comprehension for young children.Educational Computing Research,46(2),135-152.
16. Kristin, L.,Leah, D.,Soro, M.(2009).Teaching reading to English language learners.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
17. Luik, P.,Mikk, J.(2008).What is important in electronic textbooks for students of different achievement levels?.Computer & Education,50,1483-1493.
18. McFall, R.(2005).Electronic textbooks that transform how textbooks are used.The Electronic Library,23(1),72-81.
19. NSW Department of Education and Training(2010).Teaching comprehension strategies.Sydney, Australia:Neales.
20. Oliveira, J. D.,Camacho, M.,Gisbert, M.(2014).Exploring students and teacher perception of e-textbooks in a primary school.Comunicar,42,87-95.
21. Oxford, R. L.(1990).Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.New York, NY:Newbury House.
22. Shepperd, J. A.,Grace, J. L.,Koch, E. J.(2008).Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text?.Teaching of Psychology,35(1),2-5.
23. Smith, F.(2004).Understanding reading.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Stone, R. W.,Eveleth, L. B.(2013).Students' expectation, confirmation, and continuance intention to use electronic textbooks.Computers in Human Behavior,29,984-990.
25. Sutherland, R.(2004).Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom.Computers & Education,43,5-16.
26. Szabo, M.,Poohkay, B.(1996).An experimental study of animation, mathematics achievement, and attitude toward computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,28(3),390-412.
27. Szapkiw, A. J. R.,Courduff, J.,Carter, K.,Bennett, D.(2013).Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning.Computer & Education,63,259-266.
28. Vacca, J.,Vacca, R.,Gove, M.(1991).Reading and learning to read.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
29. Waters, J. K.(2011).Can tech transcend the textbook?.Campus Technology,24(7),34-36.
30. Young, J. N.(2009).This could be the year of e-textbooks.Chronicle of Higher Education,56(3),1-12.
31. 王瓊珠(2010)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北市:心理。
32. 何冠慧(2009)。教科書趨勢發展與研究。教科書研究，2(2)，126-131。
33. 周倩、張芳綺(2002)。網路學習互動性之初探：科技功能與認知學習。「網路教學與圖書資訊學應用」研討會論文集，臺北市:
34. 岳修平譯、Gagne, E. D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.(2003)。教學心理學─學習的認知基礎。臺北市:遠流。
35. 許振家、翁福元(2014)。娛樂至死方休？反思電子教科書的美麗與哀愁。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(7)，39-44。
36. 陳建雄譯、Preece, J.、Rogers, Y.、Sharp, H.(2009)。互動設計。臺北市:全華。
37. 黃思華(2014)。互動式電子書對原住民高中職學生閱讀理解能力之研究。教育科技與學習，2(2)，143-164。
38. 劉兆文、陳怡欣(1999)。從閱讀的認知歷程談有效教學策略。教師天地，102，78-85。

1. 陳奕璇(2020)。擴增實境融入多媒體教材：視覺藝術互動電子書之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，122，57-70。
2. 謝金枝(2016)。教科書研究的整合取徑─混合方法研究。課程與教學，19(3)，55-84。
3. (2018)。文化回應課程與評量之統整模式：以偏鄉原住民小學的自然災害單元為例。教育學刊，51，35-79。