體積電子教材設計與教學試驗－小學五年級

An Experiment on Volume Measurement Electronic Instructional Materials and Instruction: Grade 5

10.6481/JTR.201508_8(2).03

黃幸美(Hsin-Mei E. Huang)

三維空間幾何概念 ； 體積公式 ； 體積測量 ； three-dimensional spatial geometry ； formula for volume measurement ； volume measurement

教科書研究

8卷2期（2015 / 08 / 15）

73 - 106

繁體中文

本研究探討兩套體積電子教材對五年級兒童解決體積問題能力之影響。研究對象取自臺北市兩所公立小學各兩班五年級兒童（N=108），各校的兩班分別被隨機分派一班為動態幾何軟體應用之幾何融入體積課程組（實驗組，n=55）；另一班為無動態幾何軟體融入體積課程組（對照組，n=53）。研究結果顯示：實驗組於後測的整體表現優於對照組，此現象亦呈顯在體積意義說明題、體積比較題及綜合應用問題共三個分測驗的解題表現。實驗組與對照組受訪者皆有高人次指出從教材學到：體積的計算與公式、體積比較、體積單位與堆疊，且認為所習得的概念對解決體積問題有幫助；實驗組比對照組有較多人次指出學到立方體的性質與特徵、體積意義及圖形動態展示，此學習差異亦反映不同教材的特徵與差異。根據研究結果，本研究提出強化兒童解決體積問題能力的課程與教學建議。

This study examined the effectiveness of two sets of electronic instruction materials used to teach children how to solve volume measurement problems. Two fifth-grade classes (N=108) were recruited respectively from two public elementary schools in Taipei, Taiwan. The two classes in each participating school were randomly assigned to two conditions: (a) the experimental-condition in which the dynamic geometry software-based approach with geometry-and-volume-measurement curriculum was given (n=55); (b) the control-condition in which the volume measurement curriculum without dynamic geometry software-based approach was provided (n=53). Findings show that the experimental-group outperformed the control-group in overall scores on the posttest and the scores on the three subscales, including explaining the meaning of volume, volume comparison, and reasoning-and-application. The interview data also demonstrated that the interviewees from the experimental-group more frequently acquired the characteristics of rectangular solids, the meaning of volume, and exhibitions of dynamic figures than those from the control-group. The distinctiveness between the two sets of curricula may show differences in learning outcomes between the two groups. The implications of the study and suggestions for enhancing children's ability to solve volume measurement problems are discussed.

1. 張碧芝、吳昭容(2009)。影響六年級學生立方體計數表現的因素─空間定位與視覺化的角色。教育心理學報，41(1)，125-146。
   連結：
2. 黃幸美(2009)。整合二維空間幾何與面積概念的課程與教學試驗。科學教育學刊，17(6)，509-530。
   連結：
3. Cabrilog Company. (2009). About Cabrilog history. Retrieved from http://www.Cabrilog.com
4. 國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域（2010）。
5. 國民小學課程標準（1993）。
6. Ben-Haim, D.,Lappan, G.,Houang, R. T.(1985).Visualizing rectangular solids made of small cubes: Analyzing and effecting students' performance.Educational Studies in Mathematics,16(4),389-409.
7. Clements, D. H.(Ed.),Bright, G.(Ed.)(2003).Learning and teaching measurement. 2003 year book.Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8. Cooper, L. A.(1990).Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,16(6),1097-1106.
9. Duval, R.(1995).Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processing.Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education,Berlin, Germany:
10. Fuys, D.,Geddes, D.,Tischler, R.(1988).The Van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph,3,1-195.
11. Gavin, M. K.,Casa, T. M.,Adelson, J. L.,Firmender, J. M.(2013).The impact of challenging geometry and measurement units on the achievement of grade 2 students.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,44(3),478-509.
12. Goldman, S. R.,Scardamalia, M.(2013).Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities.Cognition and Instruction,31(2),255-269.
13. Grouws, D. A.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.New York, NY:Macmillan.
14. Gutiérrez, A.(Ed.),Boero, P.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present, and feature.Rotterdam, the Netherlands:Sense Publishers.
15. Kilpatrick, J.(Ed.),Martin, W. G.(Ed.),Schifter, D.(Ed.)(2003).A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Kordaki, M.,Balomenou, A.(2006).Challenging students to view the concept of area in triangles in a broad context: Exploring the features of Cabri-II.International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,11(1),99-135.
17. Li, Q.,Ma, X.(2010).A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students' mathematics learning.Educational Psychology Review,22,215-243.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2006).Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence.Reston, VA:Author.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
20. Smith, C. L.,Wiser, M.,Anderson, C. W.,Krajcik, J.(2006).Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessments: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory.Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,4(1-2),1-98.
21. Van de Walle, J. A.(2004).Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally.New York, NY:Pearson Education.
22. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.,Buys, K.(2008).Young children learn measurement and geometry: A learning-teaching trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for the lower grades in primary school.Rotterdam, the Netherlands:Sense.
23. Van der Meij, J.,de Jong, T.(2006).Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment.Learning and Instruction,16,199-212.
24. Wu, H.-K.,Krajcik, J. S.,Soloway, E.(2001).Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(7),821-842.
25. 王學武、陳偉文(2008)。支援國小體積教學之Web3D 教學網站開發之研究。國民教育，49(1)，41-51。
26. 王學武、黃榆婷、曾舒珮、王茵(2009)。數位遊戲式正方體展開圖教材於提升國小學生空間能力成效之研究。教學科技與媒體，87，20-42。
27. 朱心蕾(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所。
28. 朱建正(2000)。小學量與實測教材課程解讀─從八十二年課程標準到九年一貫課程綱要。翰林文教雜誌，16，6-19。
29. 國立教育研究院籌備處(2006)。小數學教材分析─體積和角度。新北市:作者。
30. 黃幸美(2004)。兒童的數學問題解決與思考。臺北市:心理。
31. 臺灣省國民學校教師研習會編(1997)。國民小學數學科新課程概說﹝中年級﹞─協助兒童認知發展的數學課程。臺北縣:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
32. 賴蕙慈(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所。
33. 謝明欣(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所。

1. 謝金枝(2016)。教科書研究的整合取徑─混合方法研究。課程與教學，19(3)，55-84。