小學數學教科書使用之探究

Investigation of Elementary Mathematics Textbooks Use in Classrooms in Taiwan

10.6481/JTR.201708_10(2).04

徐偉民(Wei-Min Hsu)

忠實度 ； 教科書使用 ； 數學教科書 ； 數學問題 ； fidelity ； textbook use ； mathematics textbook ； mathematics problem

教科書研究

10卷2期（2017 / 08 / 15）

99 - 132

繁體中文

本研究探討教師數學教科書使用的情形，從對於教科書客觀內容及編輯主觀意圖使用的忠實度來探討，並了解教師教科書使用時的考量。45位不同背景的國小教師參與本研究，歷經一學年的教學觀察與訪談，發現教師偏向忠實地使用教科書中的數學問題，大都使用例題呈現的表徵與解題方法，但問題的呈現偏向以傳統講述的方式，較少提供學生討論或進行概念的連結，營造的學習環境偏向以教師為中心，而非聚焦在理解與學生的思考上。教師普遍有忠實地使用教科書的客觀內容，但與教科書編輯的主觀意圖有所落差的教科書使用情形，認同教科書的編排與代表性，是教師忠實使用教科書內容的主因；教學時間的不足，使教師在教學中無法實踐改革課程所強調的理解、主動思考、推理與溝通的數學教學。教科書版本、教師數學背景與教學年資，對其數學教科書的使用，並無明顯的差異。

This study aims to explore the use of mathematics textbooks by teachers from the perspective of fidelity to objective content of textbooks and the use of subjective intention. It probes into the factors of the use of textbooks by teachers. Forty-five elementary teachers with different backgrounds participated in this study. This study employed instructional observations and interviews during one academic year that demonstrate that teachers tended to use the mathematics problems in textbooks faithfully and they typically employed representations and solutions in sample problems. However, they usually relied on traditional lectures to present the problems and rarely provided students with opportunities for discussion or conceptual connection. In addition, the learning environment created was teacher-centered instead of focused on student comprehension thinking. Generally speaking, teachers faithfully used the objective content of textbooks, but there was a gap with the subjective intentions of textbook editing. Identification with the layout and representation of textbooks is the main reason that teachers faithfully used textbook content. However, due to lack of instructional time, teachers could not carry out mathematics instruction focused on key characteristics of reformed curriculum, including comprehension, active thinking, reasoning, and communication. Neither textbook version nor the mathematics background and teaching experience of teachers explained differences in the use of mathematics textbooks.

1. 徐偉民(2013)。國小數學教科書數學問題類型與呈現方式之比較分析─以臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡為例。科學教育學刊，21(3)，263-289。
   連結：
2. 徐偉民(2011)。數學課程實施：一位國小資深教師的個案研究。科學教育學刊，19(2)，101-122。
   連結：
3. 徐偉民(2013)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊，21(1)，25-48。
   連結：
4. 張淑怡(2014)。數學教師教科書使用之個案分析：以多面體單元教學活動調整為例。當代教育研究季刊，22(2)，133-175。
   連結：
5. 陳仁輝、楊德清(2010)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊，18(1)，43-61。
   連結：
6. 國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域（2008）。
7. Brown, M.,Edelson, D.(2003).,未出版
8. Chval, K.(Ed.),Heck, D.(Ed.),Weiss, I.(Ed.),Ziebarth, S.(Ed.)(2012).Approaches to studying the enacted mathematics curriculum.Charlote, NC:Information Age.
9. Confrey, J.(Ed.),Stohl, V.(Ed.)(2004).On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
10. Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006).Mathematics syllabus primary.Singapore:Ministry of Education.
11. Grouws, D. A.,Tarr, J. E.,Chávez, Ó.,Sears, R.,Soria, V. M.,Taylan, R. D.(2013).Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students' mathematics learning from curricula representing subject-specific and integrated content organizations.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,44(2),416-463.
12. Henningsen, M.,Stein, M. K.(1997).Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhabit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(5),524-549.
13. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A.(2007).From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the "voice" of a mathematics textbook.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,38(4),344-369.
14. Kloosterman, P.(Ed.),Lester, F.(Ed.)(2004).The 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the national assessment of educational progress: Results and interpretations.Reston, VA:NCTM.
15. Lester, F.(Ed.)(2007).Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
16. Lloyd, G. M.(2008).Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher's appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(1),63-94.
17. National Board of Education(2004).National core curriculum for basic education 2004: National core curriculum for basic education for intended pupils in compulsory education.Helsinki, Finland:Author.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
19. Nicol, C.,Crespo, S.(2006).Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials.Educational Studies in Mathematics,62,331-355.
20. Remillard, J.(2005).Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricular.Review of Educational Research,75(2),211-246.
21. Silver, E. A.,Mesa, V. M.,Morris, K. A.,Star, J. R.,Benken, B. M.(2009).Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification.American Educational Research Journal,46(2),501-531.
22. Son, J.,Senk, S. L.(2010).How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions.Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(2),117-142.
23. Tarr, J. E.,Grouws, D. A.,Chávez, Ó.,Soria, V. M.(2013).The effects of content organization and curriculum implementation on students' mathematics learning in second-year high school courses.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,44(4),683-729.
24. Zhu, Y.,Fan, L.(2006).Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,4,609-626.
25. 莊月嬌、張英傑(2006)。九年一貫課程小學幾何教材內容與份量之分析。國立臺北教育大學學報，19(1)，33-66。
26. 黃光雄編、簡茂發編(2000)。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。
27. 鄭雅今(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東市，國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所。

1. 徐偉民(Wei-Min Hsu)(2023)。實驗學校文化本位數學補充式課程之發展。教科書研究。16(2)。1-41。