Evolution of English Curriculum: A Longitudinal Vocabulary Study of English Textbooks

從菁英教育到普羅教育－英語文教科書歷史

10.6481/JTR.202308_16(2).03

I-Chung Ke(柯宜中)

textbook studies ； English as a foreign language (EFL) ； global English ； world culture ； historical study ； 教科書研究 ； 英語為外語 ； 全球英語 ； 世界文化 ； 歷史研究

教科書研究

16卷2期（2023 / 08 / 15）

91 - 130

英文;繁體中文

This corpus-based study investigated the transformation of English from an elite to a mass language as portrayed in textbooks used by five generations in Taiwan (ages of 20-69 years). By analyzing 989,629 tokens from 1921 lessons across 33 editions at elementary, junior high, and high school levels-from the 1960s to the 2010s-the study revealed distinct generational trends. Notably, the textbooks of the oldest generation, who experienced an era of elitist secondary education, exhibited more complex and extensive content than did textbooks for the generation now in their 40s and 50s. Notably, the textbooks for the generation now in their 20s had more content and a higher complexity level than did those used by the generation now in their 60s. The origin of the stark complexity gap between junior high and high school might be attributed to the 1968 implementation of compulsory education, a disparity that persists despite the introduction of English at the elementary level. Finally, the study recommends that curriculum designers should increase content quantity while reducing complexity in high school English textbooks to facilitate a smoother transition from junior high to high school.

臺灣英語教育極少歷史縱向大範圍跨學習階段之研究。本研究檢驗各世代（20～60歲）在其國中小及高中所接觸的英文教科書，以比較教育中新制度學派世界文化理論為基礎，從教育普及化角度來檢視過去50年來的演變趨勢。共蒐集高中國中國小教科書共33版本1,921課，以語料庫字彙分析檢驗英語角色定位。研究發現1968年九年國民義務教育實施前英文課本的質量均顯著高於實施後20年，證實英語為菁英語言特性，但在40年內持續上升趨勢下，最年輕世代之英文課本質量已經超過最早英文還是菁英語言時的課本，顯示目前高中畢業生之預期英文程度和50年前只有少數菁英能達到的程度類似，且國高中之間的斷層在九年國教實施後出現，高中英文之質量是國中的2倍以上，此結果可解釋為高中英語課程仍以菁英教育方式設計，未考量近年來廣設高中政策將高中視為基本國民教育。

1. Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (Ed.). (2003). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980359
   連結：
2. Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discourse in social studies, history, and civics textbooks, 1970-2008. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 517-545. https://doi.org/10.1086/660797
   連結：
3. Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2012). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366-393. https://doi.org/10.1086/665708
   連結：
4. Cha, Y.-K., & Ham, S.-H. (2008). The impact of English on the school curriculum. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 313-327). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch22
   連結：
5. Cheng, Y.-S., & Chang, S.-C. (2022). Do senior high school English textbooks sufficiently prepare students for the high-stakes college entrance examinations? A corpus-based analysis of text difficulty. Journal of Textbook Research, 15(1), 43-80. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202204_15(1).02
   連結：
6. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
   連結：
7. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
   連結：
8. Ke, I.-C. (2012). From EFL to English as an international and scientific language: Analyzing Taiwan’s high school English textbooks 1952-2009. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.683530
   連結：
9. Ke, I.-C. (2019). Has English been increasingly tested as an international language? Evidence from 1956-2016. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.10 80/07908318.2018.1512609
   連結：
10. Klare, G. R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(1), 62-102. https:// doi.org/10.2307/747086
    連結：
11. Lin, W.-T., Chen, H.-R., Liu, C.-Y., & Giang, H.-L. (2016). Using Lexile text analyzer to examine the readability of junior and senior high school English textbooks. Journal of Textbook Studies, 9(3), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201612_9(3).04
    連結：
12. McEneaney, L. H., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The content of the curriculum: An institutionalist perspective. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 189-211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36424-2_9
    連結：
13. Meyer, J. W. (2007). World models, national curricula, and the centrality of the individual. In A. Benavot, C. Braslavsky, & N. Truong (Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective (pp. 259-271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020- 5736-6_16
    連結：
14. Moon, R. J., & Koo, J.-W. (2011). Global citizenship and human rights: A longitudinal analysis of social studies and ethics textbooks in the Republic of Korea. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 574-599. https://doi.org/10.1086/660796
    連結：
15. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0718.pub2
    連結：
16. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987b). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112615
    連結：
17. Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2013). Universalizing the university in a world society. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 257-273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4975-7_15
    連結：
18. Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of education: An introduction. Routledge.
    連結：
19. Cheng, Y.-S., & Chang, S.-C. (2022). Do senior high school English textbooks sufficiently prepare students for the high-stakes college entrance examinations? A corpus-based analysis of text difficulty. Journal of Textbook Research, 15(1), 43-80. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202204_15(1).02
    連結：
20. Lin, W.-T., Chen, H.-R., Liu, C.-Y., & Giang, H.-L. (2016). Using Lexile text analyzer to examine the readability of junior and senior high school English textbooks. Journal of Textbook Studies, 9(3), 109-141. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201612_9(3).04
    連結：
21. Baker, D., & LeTendre, G. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University.
22. Campbell, J. (Ed.). (2001). Creating our common future: Educating for unity in diversity. UNESCO.
23. Chiu, Y.-Y. (2012). The representations of English users and the context of English use in Taiwanese and Northern European EFL elementary school textbooks [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of Foreign Languages and Applied Linguistics, Yuan Ze University.
24. Chou, P.-Y. (2003). Analysis of the current situation and prospective trends of textbook studies. In Association for Curriculum and Instruction, Taiwan, R.O.C. (Ed.), Selection and evaluation of textbooks (pp. 175-207). Fu Wen.
25. Drori, G. S., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Global scientization: An environment for expanded organization. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 50-68). Oxford University.
26. Hsieh, Y.-F. (2010). Vocabulary and collocations in EFL textbooks vs. authentic materials: A corpus study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of English, National Taipei University of Technology.
27. Kao, Y.-C. (2014). A corpus analysis of word frequency lists and lexical coverage for senior high school English textbooks and the reading comprehension tests of JCEE [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of English, National Taiwan University of Technology.
28. McEneaney, E. (1998). The transformation of primary school science and mathematics: A cross- national analysis, 1900-1995 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
29. McEneaney, E. (2003). Elements of a contemporary primary school science. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & E. Schofer (Eds.), Science in the modern world polity (pp. 136-154). Stanford University.
30. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University.
31. McMichael, P. (2016). Development and social change: A global perspective. Sage.
32. Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2003). The world institutionalization of education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111-132). Peter Lang.
33. Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D., & Benavot, A. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century. Falmer. Ministry of Education. (1987). Fifth annual report on education.
34. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987a). Global patterns of educational institutionalization. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 150-171). Sage.
35. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2003). Transferring education, displacing reforms. In J. Schiewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 155-187). Peter Lang.
36. Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (Ed.). (2003). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980359
37. Baker, D., & LeTendre, G. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University.
38. Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discourse in social studies, history, and civics textbooks, 1970-2008. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 517-545. https://doi.org/10.1086/660797
39. Campbell, J. (Ed.). (2001). Creating our common future: Educating for unity in diversity. UNESCO.
40. Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2012). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366-393. https://doi.org/10.1086/665708
41. Cha, Y.-K., & Ham, S.-H. (2008). The impact of English on the school curriculum. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 313-327). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch22
42. Chiu, Y.-Y. (2012). The representations of English users and the context of English use in Taiwanese and Northern European EFL elementary school textbooks [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of Foreign Languages and Applied Linguistics, Yuan Ze University.
43. Chou, P.-Y. (2003). Analysis of the current situation and prospective trends of textbook studies. In Association for Curriculum and Instruction, Taiwan, R.O.C. (Ed.), Selection and evaluation of textbooks (pp. 175-207). Fu Wen.
44. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
45. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
46. Drori, G. S., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Global scientization: An environment for expanded organization. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 50-68). Oxford University.
47. Hsieh, Y.-F. (2010). Vocabulary and collocations in EFL textbooks vs. authentic materials: A corpus study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of English, National Taipei University of Technology.
48. Kao, Y.-C. (2014). A corpus analysis of word frequency lists and lexical coverage for senior high school English textbooks and the reading comprehension tests of JCEE [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Department of English, National Taiwan University of Technology.
49. Ke, I.-C. (2012). From EFL to English as an international and scientific language: Analyzing Taiwan’s high school English textbooks 1952-2009. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.683530
50. Ke, I.-C. (2019). Has English been increasingly tested as an international language? Evidence from 1956-2016. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1512609
51. Klare, G. R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(1), 62-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/747086
52. McEneaney, E. (1998). The transformation of primary school science and mathematics: A cross-national analysis, 1900-1995 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
53. McEneaney, E. (2003). Elements of a contemporary primary school science. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & E. Schofer (Eds.), Science in the modern world polity (pp. 136-154). Stanford University.
54. McEneaney, L. H., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The content of the curriculum: An institutionalist perspective. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 189-211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36424-2_9
55. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University.
56. McMichael, P. (2016). Development and social change: A global perspective. Sage.
57. Meyer, J. W. (2007). World models, national curricula, and the centrality of the individual. In A. Benavot, C. Braslavsky, & N. Truong (Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective (pp. 259-271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5736-6_16
58. Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2003). The world institutionalization of education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111-132). Peter Lang.
59. Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D., & Benavot, A. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century. Falmer.
60. Ministry of Education. (1987). Fifth annual report on education.
61. Moon, R. J., & Koo, J.-W. (2011). Global citizenship and human rights: A longitudinal analysis of social studies and ethics textbooks in the Republic of Korea. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 574-599. https://doi.org/10.1086/660796
62. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0718.pub2
63. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987a). Global patterns of educational institutionalization. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 150-171). Sage.
64. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987b). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112615
65. Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2013). Universalizing the university in a world society. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 257-273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4975-7_15
66. Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of education: An introduction. Routledge.