英文摘要
|
This paper uses the viewpoints of Eastern Philosophy to discuss their possible inspirations to contemporary consciousness studies. First of all, two concepts of consciousness are introduced, one of them can be explained by science and the other cannot, which is also called the Hard Problem. Secondly, the similar features between morality and the Hard Problem of consciousness are discussed. Thirdly, this paper compares different approaches between the East and West to the studies of consciousness. Eastern Philosophy views consciousness as the fundamental feature of human beings. One of the reasons that human beings can pursue meaningful life is because of the necessary existence of conscious experience. It is our conscious experience that makes a valuable life possible. Therefore, consciousness in Eastern Philosophy focuses on the aspects of morality and religion, and emphasizes the training of the ability of consciousness rather than its knowledge. In brief, the aspect of value and morality is the elementary concern of Eastern Philosophy regarding the viewpoint of consciousness, and this is the truly hard problem. Finally, this paper concludes with the comparison of the basic standpoints of consciousness between the Eastern Philosophy and the contemporary English academic circle. Hopefully, one day consciousness can be fully discovered from these diverse viewpoints to enhance our comprehensive understanding of it and therefore further the happiness of human beings.
|
参考文献
|
-
蔡耀明(2008)。生命與生命哲學:界說與釐清。國立臺灣大學哲學論評,35,155-190。
連結:
-
《阿毗達摩俱舍論》大正藏第二十九冊
-
《中阿含經》大正藏第一冊
-
《雜阿含經》大正藏第二冊
-
(1995).Ned Block On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,18(2),227-247.
-
C.A.F. Rhys Davids, A Buddhist Manual of Psychological Ethics, London, PTS, 1900
-
《增壹阿含經》大正藏第二冊
-
Austin, James H.(1998).Zen and the Brain: Toward an Understanding of Meditation and Consciousness.The MIT Press.
-
Chalmers, David J(1997).Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.Explaining Consciousness: The 'Hard Problem'
-
Chalmers, David J.(1997).The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.Oxford University Press.
-
Clayton, Philip(ed.)(2006).The Oxford Handbook of Science and Religion.Oxford University Press.
-
Flanagan, Owen(1992).Consciousness Reconsidered.MIT.
-
Flanagan, Owen J.(2007).The Really Hard Problem: Meaning in a Material World.MIT Press.
-
Luis, Pier Luigi(2008).The Two Pillars of Buddhism: Consciousness And Ethics.Journal of Consciousness Studies,15(1),84-107.
-
Petitot, Jean(ed.),Varela, Francisco(ed.),Pachoud, Bernard(ed.),Roy, Jean-Michel(ed.)(2000).Naturalizing Phenomenology: Contemporary Issues in Phenomenology and Cognitive Science.Stanford University Press.
-
Robbins, Philip,Jack, Anthony I.(2006).The Phenomenal Stance.Philosophical Studies,127,59-85.
-
Seager, Seager(1995).Consciousness, information and panpsychism.Journal of Consciousness Studies,2(3),272-288.
-
Searle, John(1992).The Rediscovery of the Mind.MIT Press.
-
Searle, John R.(1998).Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World.Basic Books.
-
Searle, John R.(1997).The Mystery of Consciousness.New York:New York Review Books.
-
Searle, John R.(2008).Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power.Columbia University Press.
-
Shear, Jonathan(ed.)(1997).Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem
-
Singer, Peter(1993).Practical Ethics.Cambridge University Press.
-
Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Geoffrey.The Wings to Awakening: An Anthology from the Pali Canon.MA:Dhamma Dana Publications.
-
Varela, Francisco(1999).Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition.Stanford University Press.
-
Wallace, Allan B.(2007).Contemplative Science: Where Buddhism and Neuroscience Converge.New York:Columbia University Press.
-
Wolpe, Paul Root(2006).Reasons Scientists Avoid Thinking about Ethics.Cell,125(6),1023-1025.
-
Wright, Wayne(2007).Explanation and the Hard Problem.Philosophical Studies,132,301-330.
-
牟宗三(1970)。生命的學問。台北:三民書局。
|