從P. Ricoeur共同回憶觀點探究博雅教育

＂Collective memory＂ Concept and Implications for Liberal Education through P. Ricoeur's Viewpoint

游振鵬(YU, Chen-Peng)

回憶 ； 共同回憶 ； 博雅教育 ； 通識教育 ； 呂格爾 ； memory ； collective memory ； liberal education ； general education ； P. Ricoeur

哲學論集

48期（2017 / 07 / 01）

25 - 36

繁體中文

本文旨在藉由Ricoeur對回憶及其相關概念的主張、Ricoeur有關共同回憶概念的內涵及論證，省思當前的博雅教育。本研究的方法主要採概念分析及詮釋學方法，期能達到如下目的：1.分析Ricoeur對回憶及其相關概念之主張；2.探討Ricoeur對相關回憶觀點之詮釋與批判；3.探究Ricoeur有關共同回憶概念之內涵及論證；4.闡釋Ricoeur共同回憶觀點對博雅教育的啟思。以Ricoeur共同回憶觀點而言，正因為人有回憶，才能連結過去－現在－未來，從而探索人生的意義並自我認同，亦即，人透過思考、言說與敘事而回顧自己過往的歷史時，就能肯認其生命的價值。同時，藉由共同回憶，人與他人可以相互了解，且能進行情感、認知、觀念、態度的交會與共感。以上是人文學科與博雅教育可以發揮之處：哲學、語言、文學、藝術、歷史等學科的重點與內涵大抵是在通過共同回憶，讓人與人相互了解、交會共感，且承繼傳統並開展未來。

The purposes of this essay concentrate on ＂collective memory＂ concept and implications for liberal education in Taiwan through the perspective of P. Ricoeur. Therefore, this essay is intended as investigations as follows: (1) analyze Ricoeur's discourse about memory and the relevant concepts; (2) explore Ricoeur's interpretation and critique on the relevant theories of memory; (3) explore Ricoeur's discourse about collective memory; (4) provide implications and suggestions for liberal education based on the research results. The paper adopts conceptual analysis, and hermeneutic approach. According to the analysis of this essay, because of the connectedness of memory/collective memory, we may connect between past and future, and inquire into the meaning of life. In other words, liberal education is directly concerned with human self-understanding and mutual understanding, and our emotions, thoughts, beliefs, and characters can have conversational encounter through collective memory, history, and narration.

1. 游振鵬(2016)。P. Ricoeur 自我觀點的哲學探究及其在博雅教育上之意涵。哲學與文化，43(11)，61-76。
   連結：
2. 黄筱慧(2009)。敘事論述與靈性關懷中的生命重構。哲學與文化，36(2)，47-56。
   連結：
3. Arendt, H.(1961).Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought.New York:Penguin Books.
4. Hawhee, D.,Vivian, B.(2009).Review Essay: On the Language of Forgetting.Quarterly Journal of Speech,95(1),89-104.
5. Johnson, M. A.(2007).Memory, History, Forgetting.Anglican Theological Review,89(1),105-112.
6. Kaplan, D.(2007).Paul Ricoeur and the Nazis.Research in Phenomenology,37(2),219-236.
7. Kimball, B. A.(1995).Orators & Philosophers-A History of the Idea of Liberal Education.College Entrance Examination Board.
8. Kopper, Á.(2012).The Oppressive Totality of the Past.Alternatives: Global, Local, Political,37(2),121-132.
9. Kronman(2008).Education's End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have Given Up on the Meaning of Life.New Haven:Yale University Press.
10. Lin, M.(2005).Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza.Canadian Journal of Philosophy,35(2),243-268.
11. Marshall, D. G.(2007).Memory, History, Forgetting.Christianity & Literature,56(2),373-376.
12. Nimbalkar, N.(2011).John Locke on Personal Identity.Mens Sana Monographs,9(1),268-275.
13. Oakeshott, M.,Fuller, T.(ed.)(1989).The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education.New Haven:Yale University Press.
14. Poole, R.(2008).Memory, Responsibility, and Identity.Social Research,75(1),263-286.
15. Ricoeur, P.,Blamey, Kathleen(Trans.),Pellauer, David(Trans.)(2004).Memory, history, forgetting.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
16. Vasterling, V.(2007).Cognitive Theory and Phenomenology in Arendt's and Nussbaum's Work on Narrative.Human Studies,30(2),79-95.
17. Wall, J.(2005).The Creative Imperative: Religious Ethics and the Formation of Life in Common.Journal of Religious Ethics,33(1),45-64.
18. White, H.(2007).Guilty of History? The "Longue Durée" of Paul Ricoeur.History & Theory,46(2),233-251.
19. 汪文聖(2001)。現象學與科學哲學。臺北市:五南。
20. 張建成編(2004)。文化、人格與教育。臺北市:心理。
21. 黃武忠編、阮美慧編(2001)。洪醒夫全集—散文卷。彰化縣:彰化縣文化局。

1. 陳學毅(2020)。呂格爾晚期思想中的記憶、歷史、忘記與原諒之概念與其互相關聯。哲學與文化，47(7)，55-75。