馬若瑟《漢語劄記．下編．第四章》中的西方修辭觀

Western Rhetoric within Notitia linguæ Sinicæ, Pars secunda, Caput quartum (1728) of Joseph de Prémare

林熙強(LIN Hsi-chiang)

馬若瑟（Joseph de Prémare, 1666-1736） ； 《漢語劄記》（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ, 1728） ； 〈夢美土記〉（1709） ； 《斐德若篇》（Phaedrus） ； 精神引導（psychagogy） ； Joseph de Prémare, SJ (1666-1736) ； Notitia linguæ Sinicæ [Knowledge about the Chinese Language] (1728) ； ＂Meng Meitu Ji＂ [＂Dreaming about the Paradise＂] (1709) ； Phaedrus ； Psychagogy

中正漢學研究

38期（2021 / 12 / 01）

193 - 227

繁體中文

雍正禁教時期，法國耶穌會士馬若瑟（Joseph de Prémare, 1666-1736）蟄居穗城，《漢語劄記》（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ）即成書此間（1728）。《漢語劄記》乃舉世第一部劃分白話與文言兩種類型的漢語專書，儘管案馬若瑟在《漢語劄記．上編．第一章》之前開宗明義的弁言，這是一本幫助耶穌會士學習漢語的書，然而《漢語劄記》卻絕不只是一本學習漢語的書。如同漢學家雷慕沙（Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat, 1788-1832）的評價，《漢語劄記》的定位不能僅以文法專書甚或修辭專書衡之，而幾可視之為一部中國文學全書（un traité de literature presque complet）。學界對於《漢語劄記》的研究成果頗豐，大多從版本、例句取材、語言學習，以及《漢語劄記》在西方漢語文法書歷史上的地位入手。然而若衡以該書「下編」（典雅文學中的漢語，文言文）第四章的內容，《漢語劄記》還是一本隱含西方修辭思想的書；其中涵映的修辭思想，除了晚明耶穌會士譯介的文藝復興辭格之學外，更將西方修辭學東漸的內涵推向古希臘的修辭之術，尤其是柏拉圖（Plato, c.423-c. 347BCE）在《斐德若篇》（Phaedrus）論修辭時那套駁正辨明的「精神引導」（psychagogy），並將這樣的哲學修辭（philosophical rhetoric）與他的傳教意念結合。本文以一則「空間的隱喻」為肯綮，試圖將馬若瑟引以為例的前作〈夢美土記〉（1709），與柏拉圖的《斐德若篇》連結起來，在辭格之外另做鉤攷，探討《漢語劄記．下編．第四章》中所韞藏更深刻的西方修辭觀。

After the issue of the prohibition decree in the first year of Yongzheng reign, European Jesuits in China was deported to and detained in Guangzhou through the proscription (1724-1732). During his confinement, French Jesuit Joseph de Prémare (1666-1736) accomplished the compilation of the Notitia linguæ Sinicæ (1728) in Latin. It is the first Chines-learning treatise that divides Chinese into two categories: ＂lingua vulgari et familiari stylo/spoken language and familiar style＂ and ＂sinica oration in nobiliori librorum stylo/the language of books.＂ According to Prémare's Introductory Note to the First Part of the Notitia linguæ Sinicæ, the two parts of this work is designed to afford assistance to Jesuits to ＂acquire a full knowledge of the Chinese.＂ The Notitia linguæ Sinicæ, however, is definitely not just a treatise concerning language-learning or Chinese rhetoric, it is, in the words of Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat (1788-1832), ＂un traité de littérature presque complet.＂ Former research on the Notitia linguæ Sinicæ, though plenteous, concentrated principally on the copies and editions, on the materials of Prémare's exemplifications, on language-learning, and on the status of Notitia linguæ Sinicæ in the history of missionary Chinese grammar treatises. But if we scrutinize Chapter Four of Part Second, Notitia linguæ Sinicæ is also a book suggests the concepts of Western rhetoric. Besides the Renaissance rhetorical studies on the figure of speech, the exemplification of Notitia linguæ Sinicæ also implies Greek rhetorical notion, especially the psychagogy within Plato's Phaedrus. Through his exemplification, Prémare employs the concept of philosophical rhetoric to further the purpose of religious persuasion. Taking a ＂metaphor of space＂ as the junction, this study aims at connecting Plato's Phaedrus with Prémare's former work ＂Meng Meitu Ji＂ (1709), which he took as an example in the Notitia linguæ Sinicæ. By an analyzation beyond the figures of speech, we will penetrate the subtle concept of Western rhetoric implied within.

1. 柯保羅, Paul(2021)。馬若瑟《漢語劄記》的抄本和刊本新探。漢學研究，39(1)
   連結：
2. 蔡仁傑(2019)。論柏拉圖《斐德羅篇》中的修辭：從蘇格拉底的戰車寓言到修辭的空間形構。中外文學，48(4)
   連結：
3. Ratio atque institutio studiorum Societatis Iesu. Romæ: In Collegio Rom, eiusdé Societ, 1606.
4. 廣州《中國叢報》版（Canton: The Office of Chinese Repository, 1847），頁 278–285
5. （明）李之藻（輯）(1965).天學初函.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
6. （東晉）陶潛,（清）陶澍（注）(1968).陶靖節集.臺北:商務印書館.
7. （南宋）朱熹（集注）(2014).四書集注（甲種本）.臺北:世界書局.
8. （清）阮元（校刻）(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
9. Aristotle,Freese, J[ohn] H[enry](Trans. Intro.)(2006).The Art of Rhetoric.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
10. Aristotle,Halliwell, Stephen(Ed. trans.)(2005).Poetics / Longinus: On the Sublime / Demetrius: On Style.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
11. Aristotle,Rackham, H[arris](Trans. Intro.)(2001).Problems II: Books XXII–XXXVIII / Rhetorica ad Alexandrum.Cambridge, MA:In Problems II Harvard University Press.
12. Augustine of Hippo, Saint,Green, R. P. H.(Ed. trans.)(1996).De Doctrina Christiana.New York:Oxford University Press.
13. Augustine of Hippo, Saint,Shaw, J. F.(Trans.)(1952).The Confessions / The City of God / On Christian Doctrine.Chicago:Encyclopæ dia Britannica.
14. Benardete, Seth(1991).The Rhetoric of Morality and Philosophy: Plato’s Gorgias and Phaedrus.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
15. Bizzell, Patricia(2016)。Historical Notes on Rhetoric in Jesuit Education。Traditions of Eloquence: The Jesuits and Modern Rhetorical Studies，New York:
16. Bremmer, Jan N[icolaas](2014)。Descents to Hell and Ascents to Heaven in Apocalyptic Literature。The Oxford Handbook of Apocalyptic Literature，Oxford:
17. Cicero, Marcus Tullius,Caplan, Harry(Trans. Intro.)(1988).Rhetorical Treatises: Rhetorica ad Herennium (Ad C. Herennium de Ratione Dicendi）.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
18. Cicero, Marcus Tullius,Hendrickson, G[eorge] L[incoln](Trans. intro.)(1997).Brutus / Orator.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
19. Cicero, Marcus Tullius,Keyes, Clinton W[alker](trans.)(1988).De re publica / De legibus.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
20. Cicero, Marcus Tullius,Sutton, E[dward] W[illiam](Trans.),Rackham, Harris(Trans.),Rackham, Harris(Intro.)(2001).Rhetorical Treatises: De Oratore, Books 1-2.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
21. Farrell, Allan P[eter](1970).The Jesuit Ratio studiorum of 1599.Washington, DC:Conference of Major Superiors of Jesuits.
22. 〔美〕Farrell, Allan P[eter]. The Jesuit Code of Liberal Education: Development and Scope of the Ratio studiorium. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1938.
23. Ferrari, Giovanni R. F.(1987).Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
24. Gersh, Stephen(2002)。The Medieval Legacy from Ancient Platonism。Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach，Berlin:
25. Kastely, James L.(2015).The Rhetoric of Plato’s Republic: Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
26. Kennedy, George A[lexander](1999).Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times.Chapel Hill:The University of North Carolina Press.
27. Lundbaek, Knud(1991)。Joseph de Prémare, 1666–1736, S.J.: Chinese Philology and Figurism. Acta Jutlandica LXVI:2。Humanities series 65，Aarhus C, Denmark:
28. Macrobius, Ambrosius Theodosius(2015).Commentary on the Dream of Scipio. Translated with an Introduction and notes by William Harris Stahl. Records of Western Civilization Series.New York:Columbia University Press.
29. Mason, Jeffrey A.(1989).Philosophical Rhetoric: The Function of Indirection in Philosophical Writing.London:Routledge.
30. Murray, James S.(1988)。Disputation, Deception, and Dialectic: Plato on the True Rhetoric (Phaedrus 261–266)。Philosophy and Rhetoric，21(4)，279-289。
31. Nichols, James H., Jr.(1998)。The Rhetoric of Love and Learning in Plato’s Phaedrus。Gorgias and Phaedrus，Ithaca:
32. Novotný, František(1977).The Posthumous Life of Plato. Translation of O Platonovi, Vol. 4.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff; Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.
33. O’Malley, John(2000)。From the 1599 Ratio Studiorum to the Present: A Humanistic Tradition?。The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum: 400th Anniversary Perspectives，New York:
34. 〔英〕Peacham, Henry. The Garden of Eloquence: Conteining the Most Excellent Ornaments, Exornations, Lightes, Flowers, and Forms of Speech, Commonly Called the Figures of Rhetorike. By Which the Singular Partes of Mans Mind, Are Most Aptly Expressed, and the Sundrie Affections of His Heart Most Effectuallie Uttered. Manifested, and Furnished with Varieties of Fit Examples, Gathered Out of the Most Eloquent Orators, and Best Approved Authors, and Chieflie Out of the Holie Scriptures. Profitable and Necessarie, as wel for Private Speech, as for Publicke Orations. London: R. F. for H. Jackson, 1593.
35. 〔英〕Peacham, Henry. The Garden of Eloquence: Conteyning the Figures of Grammer and Rhetorick, from Whence Maye Bee Gathered All Manner of Flowers, Coulors, Ornaments, Exornations, Formes and Fashions of Speech, Very Profitable for All Those That Be Studious of Eloquence, and That Reade Most Eloquent Poets and Orators, and Also Helpeth Much for the Better Understanding of the Holy Scriptures. London: H. Jackson, 1577.
36. 〔法〕Pfister, Louis. Notices biographiques et bibliographiques sur les Jésuites de l’ancienne mission de Chine, 1552–1773. 2 vols. Variétés sinologiques 59–60. Shanghai: Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique, 1932–1934.
37. Plato(2003).Plato. Phaedrus. Translated with Notes, Glossary, Appendices, Interpretative Essay and Introduction.Newburyport, MA:Focus Pub./R. Pullins Co..
38. Plato,Emlyn-Jones, Chris(Ed. trans.),Preddy, William(Ed. trans.)(2013).Republic, Book VI–X.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
39. Plato,Fowler, Harold North(trans.),Lamb, W[alter] R[angeley] M[aitland](intro.)(1990).Euthyphro / Apology / Crito / Phaedo / Phaedrus.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
40. Plato,Lamb, [W]alter [R]angeley [M]aitland(trans.)(1983).Lysis / Symposium / Gorgias.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
41. Plato,Rowe, Christopher J.(Intro. Trans. Commentary)(1986).Phaedrus.Warminster:Aris & Phillips.
42. Plato,Yunis, Harvey(Ed.)(2011).Phaedrus.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
43. 〔法〕Prémare, Joseph de. Tchao Chi Cou Ell, ou Le petit-Orphelin de la Maison de Tchao, tragedie Chinoise. In Description géographique, historique, chronologique, politique, et physique de l’Empire de la Chine et de la Tartarie chinoise, enrichie des cartes générales et particulieres de ces pays, de la carte générale et des cartes particulieres du Thibet, & de la Corée; & ornée d’un grand nombre de figures & de vignettes gravées en tailledouce, edited by JeanBaptiste Du Halde, 3:339–378. 4 vols. Paris: chez P. G. Lemercier, Imprimeur-Libraire, rue Saint-Jacques, au livre d’Or, 1735.
44. 〔法〕Prémare, Joseph de. The Notitia linguæ Sinicæ of Prémare. Translated into English by J[ames] G[ranger] Bridgman. Canton: The Office of Chinese Repository, 1847.
45. 〔法〕Prémare, Joseph de. Notitia linguæ Sinicæ. Malaccæ: Academiæ Anglo-Sinensis, 1831.
46. Schur, David(2015).Plato’s Wayward Path: Literary Form and the Republic.Washington, D.C.:Center for Hellenic Studies.
47. Sharples, R[obert] W[illiam].(1985)。Plato’s Phaedrus—Argument for Immortality and Cicero’s Somnium Scipionis。Liverpool Classical Monthly，10，66-67。
48. Vezzosi, Alessandro,Asmus, John,Cotte, Pascal(2012).Mona Lisa: Leonardo’s Earlier Version.Zurich:The Mona Lisa Foundation.
49. Wardy, Robert(1996).The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. Issues in Ancient Philosophy.New York:Routledge.
50. Werner, Daniel S(2010)。Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus。Greece & Rome, Second Series，57(1)，21-46。
51. Werner, Daniel S.(2012).Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
52. Zürcher, Erik(1996)。Renaissance Rhetoric in Late Ming China: Alfonso Vagnoni’s Introduction to His Science of Comparison。Western Humanistic Culture Presented to China by Jesuit Missionaries (XVII-XVIII Centuries): Proceedings of the Conference Held in Rome，Rome:
53. 千葉謙悟(2005)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，9，113-152。
54. 千葉謙悟(2016)。プレマール『漢語劄記（Notitia Linguae Sinicae）』第二部訳注。或問』以下諸或問，29，211-228。
55. 千葉謙悟(2008)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，14，183-208。
56. 千葉謙悟(2013)。馬若瑟『中國語文註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ）例句來源考。太田斎．古屋昭弘両教授還暦記念中国語学論集，東京都:
57. 千葉謙悟(2015)。プレマール『漢語劄記（Notitia Linguae Sinicae）』第二部訳注。或問』以下諸或問，28，197-224。
58. 千葉謙悟(2013)。プレマール『漢語劄記（Notitia Linguae Sinicae）』第二部訳注。或問』以下諸或問，23，107-122。
59. 千葉謙悟(2005)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，10，121-144。
60. 千葉謙悟(2004)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，8，105-140。
61. 千葉謙悟(2010)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，19，95-114。
62. 千葉謙悟(2013)。プレマール『中国語文『註解』（Notitia linguæ Sinicæ ）。或問，23，107-122。
63. 中國宗教歷史文獻集成編纂委員會（編）,周燮藩（編）,王美秀（編）,任延黎（編）(2005).中國宗教歷史文獻集成.合肥:黃山書社.
64. 艾儒略, Giulio,葉農（整理）(2011).艾儒略漢文著述全集.桂林:廣西師範大學出版社.
65. 西塞羅, Marcus Tullius,沈叔平（譯）,蘇力（譯）(2002).國家篇國家篇／法律篇.北京:商務印書館.
66. 吳相湘（編）(1984).天主教東傳文獻三編.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
67. 吳淳邦（編）,李奭學（編）,黎子鵬（編）(2018).法國國家圖書館清代基督宗教小說選注.臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
68. 李真(2012)。來華耶穌會士漢語研究中的索隱思想初探──以馬若瑟為中心。國際漢學，23
69. 李真(2014).馬若瑟〈漢語劄記〉研究.北京:商務印書館.
70. 李奭學(2012).譯述：明末耶穌會翻譯文學論.香港中香港:香港中文大學出版社.
71. 李奭學(2011)。中西合璧的小說新體──清初耶穌會士馬若瑟著《夢美土記》初探。漢學研究，29(2)
72. 李奭學(2010).中國晚明與歐洲文學──明末耶穌會古典型證道故事考銓.北京:生活．讀書．新知三聯書店.
73. 李奭學（編）,林熙強（編）(2014).晚明天主教翻譯文學箋注.臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
74. 李奭學（編）,黎子鵬（編）(2015).中外宗教與文學裡的他界書寫.臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
75. 林熙強(2015).修辭．符號．宗教格言──耶穌會士高一志《譬學》研究.新北市:中原大學基督教與華人文化社會研究中心.
76. 柏拉圖,徐學庸（譯注）(2013).理想國篇：譯注與詮釋.合肥:安徽人民出版社.
77. 柏拉圖,王曉朝（譯）(2003).柏拉圖全集.新北:左岸文化.
78. 〔法〕馬若瑟（Joseph de Prémare, 1666–1736）：〈夢美土記〉（1709）。法國國家圖書館（Bibliothèque nationale de France）館藏王若翰抄本，檔案編號 Chinois 7045
79. 〔義〕高一志（Alfonso Vagnone, c. 1566–1640）：《譬學．下卷》崇禎六年（1633）絳州刊本。現藏梵蒂岡圖書館（Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana），高第（Henri Cordier）編號 Mus. Borg. P. F. Cinese 324 (26)
80. 張西平（編）、馬西尼, Federico（編）,任大援（編）,裴佐寧, Ambrogio M.（編）(2014).梵蒂岡圖書館藏明清中西文化交流史文獻叢刊：第一輯.鄭州:大象出版社.
81. 張漢良（編）(2015).符號與記憶──海峽兩岸的文本實踐.臺北:行人出版社.
82. 無名氏（馬若瑟）：〈天主總論〉。在馬六甲英華書院版（Malaccæ: Academiæ Anglo-Sinensis, 1831），頁 229–234
83. 奧古斯丁,石敏敏（譯）(2004).論靈魂及其起源.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
84. 輔仁大學比較文學研究所（策畫）,劉紀蕙（編）(1999).框架內外：藝術、文類與符號疆界.新北市:立緒文化事業公司.
85. 劉小楓（編譯）(2015).柏拉圖四書.北京:生活．讀書．新知三聯書店.
86. 劉紀蕙(1996)。超現實的視覺翻譯：重探臺灣現代詩「橫的移植」。中外文學，24(8)
87. 蔡仁傑(2017)。論《費德魯斯篇》中的修辭：從蘇格拉底的戰車寓言到修辭的拓樸空間。『古典詩學文獻的當代詮釋學意義』研討座談會
88. 龍伯格, Knud,李真（譯）,駱潔（譯）(2009).清代來華傳教士馬若瑟研究.鄭州:大象出版社.
89. 叢萊庭（編）,徐魯亞（編）(2007).西方修辭學.上海:上海外語教育出版社.
90. 羅伯特．沃迪, Robert,何博超（譯）(1958).修辭術的誕生：高爾吉亞、柏拉圖及其傳人.南京:人文與社會譯林出版社.
91. 鐘鳴旦（編）(1996).徐家匯藏書樓明清天主教文獻.臺北:輔仁大學神學院.
92. 鐘鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）,王仁芳（編）(2013).天主總論徐家匯藏書樓明清天主教文獻續編.臺北:臺北利氏學社.
93. 鐘鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）,蒙曦（編）(2009).真主靈性理證法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻.臺北:臺北利氏學社.
94. 鐘鳴旦, Nicolas（編）,杜鼎克, Adrian（編）,蒙曦, Nathalie（編）(2009).法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻.臺北:臺北利氏學社.
95. 顧衛民(2003).中國天主教編年史.上海:上海書店出版社.