魏晉儒道關係重探：以王弼、郭象聖人觀為論述核心

Revisit the Relationship between Confucianism and Taoism in Wei-Jin Metaphysics-Based on Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's View of Sages

楊穎詩(Ieong Weng si)

王弼 ； 郭象 ； 聖人 ； 儒道會通 ； 寄言出意 ； Wang Bi ； Guo Xiang ； sage ； Reconciling Confucianism and Taoism ； Expressing feeling by literary languages

中正漢學研究

40期（2022 / 12 / 01）

125 - 146

繁體中文;英文

前人研究多以「儒道會通」為魏晉玄學主要課題，本文藉著分析魏晉玄學代表人物－王弼、郭象的聖人觀，重新探討魏晉儒道關係。通過文本分析整理後學研究、反思當代詮釋，嘗試除了在「自然與名教」一途檢視魏晉儒道關係外，擬另闢蹊徑從聖人觀的角度切入反思魏晉儒道關係，探討以「儒道會通」論魏晉玄學的懸疑性。全文討論方向有三，一為綜合討論魏晉儒道關係，重探王弼、郭象對儒家的定位；二為透過詮釋王弼、郭象討論聖人的內容，了解二人所論的聖人之道、修養工夫以及由此而呈現的理想境界，揭示二人理論中的聖人內涵，辨清儒道義理分際。三則指出魏晉玄學家以寄言出意的方式詮釋道家思想內容，並反思討論儒道會通的時代意義。

Previous studies on Wei-Jin metaphysics were mostly based on the theory of reconciling Confucianism and Taoism. This paper will revisit the relationship between Confucianism and Taoism by analysing the representatives of Wei-Jin metaphysics-Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's view of sages. Contemporary interpretation of the two isms is expected to be re-examined in this paper by analysing original texts and research studies on related topics. This paper also attempts to review the relationship between Confucianism and Taoism from the perspective of Scholasticism and Nature, and also from the views of sages, so as to discuss the suspense of studying Wei-Jin metaphysics based on the theory of reconciling Confucianism and Taoism. Three major directions will be employed in the discussion of this paper, they include: 1. to re-discuss the way how Wang Bi and Guo Xiang position Confucianism in the relationship between itself and Taoism. 2. by interpreting Wang Bi and Guo Xiang's works on sages to understand their theory regarding sages, self-cultivation, and the social ideal state achieved by self-cultivation; in this way to clarify the distinction between the ideology of Confucianism and Taoism, which will further affirm the two metaphysicians' argumentation on the relationship between Confucianism and Taoism. 3. to analyse the way how Wei-Jin metaphysicians interpret the ideology of Taoism by the method of "expressing feeling by literary language", so as to re-evaluate the significance of reconciling Confucianism and Taoism in times.

1. 伍振勳(2009)。聖人敘事與神聖典範：《史記．孔子世家》析論。清華學報，新 39(2)
   連結：
2. 洪春音(2006)。論孔子素王說的形成與發展主向。興大中文學報，20
   連結：
3. 楊穎詩(2022)。魏晉名教的義涵與歸趣：以王弼、郭象仁義觀為論述核心。鵝湖學誌，68
   連結：
4. 謝大寧(2003)。湯用彤玄學理論的典範地位及其危機。中正大學中文學術年刊
   連結：
5. （三國魏）王弼,樓宇烈（校釋）(2008).王弼集校釋.北京:中華書局.
6. （宋）朱熹(2000).四書章句集註.臺北:鵝湖出版社.
7. （宋）朱熹,廖名春（點校）(2012).周易本義.北京:中華書局.
8. （晉）郭象（注）,（唐）成玄英（疏）,（清）郭慶藩（集釋）,王孝魚（點校）(1993).莊子集釋.臺北:萬卷樓圖書.
9. （晉）陳壽,裴松之（注）(2008).三國志.北京:中華書局.
10. （清）馬國翰(1974).玉函山房輯佚書.臺北:文海.
11. （劉宋）劉義慶,（梁）劉孝標（注）,余嘉錫（箋疏）(2009).世說新語校箋.北京:中華書局.
12. 朱漢民(2014).玄學與理學的學術思想理想研究.臺北:臺大出版中心.
13. 牟宗三(1996).圓善論.臺北:學生書局.
14. 牟宗三(1999).中國哲學十九講.臺北:學生書局.
15. 牟宗三(2002).才性與玄理.臺北:學生書局.
16. 牟宗三(2003).牟宗三先生全集.臺北:聯經出版社.
17. 余敦康(2004).魏晉玄學史.北京:北京大學出版社.
18. 宋鋼(2007).六朝論語學研究.北京:中華書局.
19. 李隆獻(2014)。先秦漢初文獻中的「孔子形象」。文與哲，25
20. 周大興(2004).自然．名教．因果──東晉玄學論集.臺北:中央研究院文哲所.
21. 莊耀郎(2006)。魏晉「名教與自然」義蘊之溯源與開展。文學、思想與社會
22. 曾春海(2009).兩漢魏晉哲學史.臺北:五南圖書出版.
23. 湯一介(2009).郭象與魏晉玄學.北京:北京大學出版社.
24. 湯一介（編）(2001).湯用彤全集.高雄:佛光書局.
25. 楊穎詩(2013).郭象《莊子注》的詮釋向度.臺北:文史哲出版社.
26. 楊穎詩(2017).老子思想詮釋的開展──從先秦到魏晉階段.臺北:文史哲出版社.