题名

國小教師使用電子教科書態度對教學行為影響研究

并列篇名

The Impact of Teachers Attitudes towards E-book Use on Teaching Behaviors: A Case Study of Elementary Schools in Changhua County

作者

鄭碧瑤(Pe-Yuo Cheng);鄭永熏(Yung-Hsun Cheng)

关键词

電子教科書 ; 態度 ; 教學行為 ; E-book ; attitude ; teaching behavior

期刊名称

設計研究學報

卷期/出版年月

8期(2015 / 09 / 01)

页次

44 - 63

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

教學行為乃教學效能與學生學習成就的關鍵,教師應用電子教科書時,會表現出什麼樣的教學行為,這是本研究探討的重點。本研究是以問卷調查法為主,並進行差異考驗,主要結論為:1. 國小教師使用電子教科書之「知覺易用性」的態度愈正向,他們在五個向度的教學行為都愈正向,且達顯著水準。2. 國小教師使用電子教科書之「知覺有用性」的態度愈正向,他們在五個向度的教學行為都愈正向,且達顯著水準。3. 國小教師使用電子教科書之「實際使用」的態度愈正向,他們在五個向度的教學行為也都愈正向,且達顯著水準。4. 在整體樣貌方面,國小教師使用電子教科書進行教學活動時,所表現出來的教學行為在30 個細項教學行為中都呈現正向的教學行為。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study is to explore how elementary school teachers’ behavior is affected by their attitude towards e-books. The research was conducted by applying a questionnaire created from a study of past literature. This study was conducted in 26 schools by using the techniques of stratified random sampling. Out of 432 samples, a total of 417 have been returned with 90.46% of them showing validity. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. When the e-books are considered easy to use, the curriculum, teaching style, communication, management skills, and critique all show significant improvement. 2. When the e-books are considered to be useful, the curriculum, teaching style, communication, management skills, and critique all show significant improvement. 3. The e-books are used by the teachers, the curriculum, teaching style, communication, management skills, and critique all show significant improvement. 4. Teaching behavior showed improvement in all 30 criteria when the elementary teachers used e-books.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. 盧家慶,2010,電子書的下一波藍海市場,數位典藏與學習電子報,第九卷第八期, http//newsletter.teldap.tw/news/InsightReportContent.php?nid=3914&1id=435
  2. Jöreskog, K. G., 1999, How Large Can a Standardized Coefficient be? Retrieved Nov. 15, 2014, from: https://drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?a=v&pid=forums&srcid=MDcxMzkyNjQwNTgzMjM4NDI2OTQBMDg0NDU3ODc1MTMyMDQ4MjczMjQBU3NnTnBrVktuQVlKATAuMQEBdjI
  3. 行政院新聞局出版事業處,2010,數位出版產業概況,http://www.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=70837&ctNode=5037&mp=3
  4. Anderson‚ J. C.,Gerbing‚D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
  5. Bagozzi‚R. P.,Yi‚Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academy of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
  6. Bennet, N.(1976).Teaching styles and pupil progress.Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.
  7. Block, C. C.,Oaker, M.,Hurt, N.(2002).Exemplary literacy teachers: A continuum from preschool through grade 5.Reading Research Quarterly,33,115-134.
  8. Borich, G. D.(1996).Effective Teaching Methods.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Merrill Press.
  9. Churchill‚G. A.(1979).A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs.Journal of Marketing Research,16(1),64-73.
  10. Conti, G. J.(1985).Assessing Teaching Style in Adult Education: How and Why?.Lifelong Learning: The Adult Year,8(8),7.
  11. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-339.
  12. Fischer, B. B.,Fischer, L.(1979).Style in teaching and learning.Education Leadership,36,245-251.
  13. Flanders, N. A.(1963).Teacher influence in the classroom.Theory and research in teaching,New York:
  14. Gefen, D.,Karahanna, E.,Straub, D. W.(2003).Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model.MIS Quarterly,27(1),52-90.
  15. Hair‚J. F.,Anderson‚R. E.,Tatham‚R. L.(1987).Multivariate data analysis with reading.New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
  16. Hall, K.,Harding, A.(2003).A systematic review of effective literacy teaching in the 4 to 14 age range of mainstream schooling.Research Evidence in Education Library, EPPI- Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education London.
  17. Jöreskog‚K. G.,Sörbom‚D.(1989).LISREL7: A guide to the program and applications.IL:SPSS Chicago.
  18. Marcoulides, G. A.(Ed.),Schumacker, R. E.(Ed.)(2001).Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  19. Maulana, R.,Helms-Lorenz, M.,Grift, W.(2015).Pupils'perceptions of teaching behaviour: Evaluation of an instrument and importance for academic motivation in Indonesian secondary education.International Journal of Educational Research,69,98-112.
  20. Morris, M. G.,Dillon, A.(1997).How user perceptions influence software training for graphical user interfaces: A longitudinal field experiment.MIS Quarterly,18,405-426.
  21. Mulholland, E.,Bates, J.(2014).Use and Perceptions of E-books by Academic Staff in Further Education.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,40(5),492-499.
  22. Röcker, C.(2009).Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease-of-Use of Ambient Intelligence Applications in Office Environments.Human-Centered Design,Germany, Heidelbeng:
  23. Szajna, B.(1996).Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science,42(1),85-92.
  24. Teo, T. S. H.(2001).Demographic and Motivation Variables Associated with Internet Usage Activities.Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy,11(2),125-137.
  25. Topping, K.,Ferguson, N.(2005).Effective literacy teaching behaviors.Journal of Research in Reading,28(2),125-143.
  26. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D.(2000).A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.Management Science,46(2),186-204.
  27. Williams‚L. J.,Hazer‚J. T.(1986).Antecedents and consequence of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation models.Journal of Applied Psychology,71,219-231.
  28. Yalman, M.(2015).Preservice Teachers' Views about e-book and Their Levels of Use of e-books.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,76(20),255-262.
  29. 何冠慧(2009)。掀開教科書發展的新篇章─談電子教科書的發展、特色與展望。教科書研究期刋,2(2)
  30. 吳志鴻(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所。
  31. 吳沛憶(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣,南華大學資訊管理學系。
  32. 吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式─AMOS 的操作與應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  33. 李叔真(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,市立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所。
  34. 李宗薇(2009)。教科書趨勢發展與研究。教科書研究期刋,2(2)
  35. 邱浩政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  36. 孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係─實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報,14
  37. 馬小蘭(2011)。電子教科書上路,師生都幸福。Taiwan News 財經文化月刊
  38. 張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華圖書出版公司。
  39. 張德銳、簡紅珠、裘友善、高淑芬、張美玉、成虹飛(1994)。發展性教師評鑑系統。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  40. 陳正昌、程炳林(2001)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  41. 陳偉慈(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東縣,屏東教育大學資訊科學系。
  42. 陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。論文統計分析:SPSS 與AMOS的運用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  43. 黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  44. 潘朝明(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市,高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所。
  45. 蔡昆瀛(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
  46. 顏銘志(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東縣,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 魏彗娟、周倩、余心蓓(2017)。國小教師使用教用版電子教科書之滿意度:以學校地區、資訊素養與教學環境狀況為探討因素。教育科學研究期刊,62(3),125-158。
  2. 謝金枝(2016)。教科書研究的整合取徑─混合方法研究。課程與教學,19(3),55-84。