「大學生設計產品美感生活體驗量表」之發展

The Development of ＂Inventory for College Students’ Everyday Aesthetic Experience in Designed Products＂

葉玉珠(Yu-Chu Yeh)；賴思齊(Ssu-Chi Lai)；李若瑜(Jo-Yu Lee)

大學生 ； 美感體驗 ； 設計產品 ； 量表 ； college students ； aesthetic experience ； designed products ； inventory

設計研究學報

8期（2015 / 09 / 01）

64 - 80

繁體中文

美感體驗乃個體接受美感刺激時，產生美感知覺、美感賞析、美感聯想、美感判斷與美感情緒的歷程，此歷程可能受到生活經驗的影響。因此，美感體驗教學應從日常生活的體驗出發。本研究嘗試以設計產品為內涵，從美感體驗的歷程出發，發展｢大學生設計產品美感生活體驗量表｣（ICS-EAEDP），以提供美感體驗相關研究一份具有信度與效度的研究工具。研究者首先以407位大學生的資料進行ICS-EAEDP 的預試，再以331 位大學生的資料進行ICS-EAEDP 的正式施測。資料分析方法包括項目分析、探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析、Cronbach’s 內部一致性信度分析，皮爾森積差相關分析。研究結果發現，ICS-EAEDP 具有良好的信度與效度；最後版本的ICS-EAEDP包含美感知覺與分析、美感鑑賞與情緒、美感經驗聯想三個因素。

Aesthetic experience is the process of producing asthetic perceptions, analyses, associations, judgments, and emotions; such a process may be greatly influenced by everyday experience. Accordingly, the instruction of asthetic experience should start from everyday experience. This study tried to develop the ＂Inventory for College Students’ Everyday Aesthetic Experience in Designed Products＂ (ICS-EAEDP) based on theories of aesthetic experience. Hopefully, this inventory would provide a valid and reliable instrument for aesthetic-related studies. We first used 407 college students in the pretest and then included 331 college studnets in the formal test. Methods for data analysis were item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s internal reliability analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis. The findings suggest that ICS-EAEDP has good reliability and validity. The final version of ICSEAEDP includes the following three factors: aesthetic perceptions and analyses, aesthetic judgments and emotions, and everyday-experience associations.

1. 陳玲璋(2013)。全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究。藝術教育研究，25，109-135。
   連結：
2. 陳瓊花(1997)。審美發展理論之探討及其對未來研究之意義。師大學報，42，13-27。
   連結：
3. Dewey, J., 1934, “Arts as Experience”, Perigee Books, New York.
4. Calvo-Merino, B.,Jola, C.,Glaser, D. E.,Haggard, P.(2008).Towards a Sensorimotor Aesthetics of Performing Art.Consciousness and Cognition,17(3),911-922.
5. Cela-Conde, C. J.,Marty, G.,Maestu, F.,Ortiz, T.,Munar, E.,Fernandez, A.,Roca, M.,Rossello, J.,Quesney, F.(2004).Activation of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Human Visual Aesthetic Perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,101(16),6321-6325.
6. Chatterjee, A.,Vartanian, O.(2014).Neuroaesthetics.Trends in Cognitive Science,18,370-375.
7. Cupchik, G. C.,Vartanian, O.,Crawley, A.,Mikulis, D. J.(2009).Viewing Artworks, Contributions of Cognitive Control and Perceptual Facilitation to Aesthetic Experience.Brain and Cognition,70,84-91.
8. Fletcher, P. C.,Happe, F.,Frith, U.,Baker, S. C.,Dolan, R. J.,Frackowiak, R. S.,Frith, C. D.(1995).Other Minds in the Brain: A Functional Imaging Study of 'Theory Of Mind' in Story Comprehension.Cognition,57(2),109-128.
9. Geertz, C.(2000).Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
10. Gjerde, M.(2010).Visual Aesthetic Perception and Judgement of Urban Streetscapes.W101-Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress,Salford, United Kingdom:
11. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.,Fokialis, P.,Kabouropoulou, M.(2012).Thinking About Creativity in Science Education.Creative Education,3(5),603-611.
12. Irvin, S.(2008).The Pervasiveness of the Aesthetic in Ordinary Experience.British Journal of Aesthetics,48(1),29-44.
13. Jacobsen, T.,Schubotz, R. I.,Hofel, L.,Cramon, D. Y.(2006).Brain Correlates of Aesthetic Judgment of Beauty.Neuroimage,29,276-285.
14. Kirk, U.,Skov, M.,Hulme, O.,Christensen, M. S.,Zeki, S.(2009).Modulation of Aesthetic Value by Semantic Context: An fMRI Study.NeuroImage,44(3),1125-1132.
15. Leder, H.,Belke, B.,Oeberst, A.,Augustin, D.(2004).A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments.British Journal of Psychology,95,489-508.
16. Locher, P.,Krupinski, E.A.,Mello-Thoms, C.,Nodine, C. F.(2007).Visual Interest in Pictorial Art During An Aesthetic Experience.Spatial Vision,21,55-77.
17. Lundstrom, B. N.,Ingvar, M.,Petersson, K. M.(2005).The Role of Precuneus and Left Inferior Frontal Cortex During Source Memory Episodic Retrieval.Neuroimage,27(4),824-34.
18. Maguire, E. A.,Frith, C. D.,Morris, R. G. M.(1999).The Functional Neuroanatomy of Comprehension and Memory: The Importance of Prior Knowledge.Brain,122(10),1839-1850.
19. Mastandrea, S.,Bartoli, G.,Carrus, G.(2011).The Automatic Aesthetic Evaluation of Different Art and Architectural Styles.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,5(2),126-134.
20. Parsons, M. J.(1987).How We Understand Art: A Cognitive Developmental Account of Aesthetic Experience.New York:Cambridge University Press.
21. Sinner, A.,Leggo, C.,Irwin, R. L.,Gouzouasis, P.,Grauer, K.(2006).Arts-based Educational Research Dissertations: Reviewing the Practices of New Scholars.Canadian Journal of Education,29(4),1223-1270.
22. Townsend, C.,Sood, S.(2014).Self-Affirmation through the Choice of Highly Aesthetic Products.Journal of Consumer Research,39,415-428.
23. Van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J.,Srogi, L. A.,Husman, J.,Semken, S.,Fuhrman, M.(2011).Engaging Students to Learn through the Affective Domain: A New Framework gor Teaching in the Geosciences.Journal of Geoscience Education,59(2),71-84.
24. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。台北:高等教育。
25. 李彥希(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。台中，國立中興大學園藝學系研究所。
26. 林素卿(2009)。美感經驗對課程美學建構之啟示。東海教育評論，3，43-70。
27. 查修傑譯、Pink, Daniel H.(2006)。未來在等待的人才。
28. 胡景婷(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立中正大學行銷管理研究所。
29. 范勻瑄(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立政治大學廣告研究所。
30. 許芳菊(2010)。關鍵能力︰你的孩子該學什麼。台北:華夏出版社。
31. 陳明陽(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立交通大學應用藝術研究所。
32. 陳昭儀(2013)。臺灣傑出表演藝術家之創造與生涯歷程。台北市:師大出版中心。
33. 楊曉珞、雅柏甦詠‧ 博伊哲努(2009)。鄒族美學知識。臺灣原住民研究論叢，6，55-80。

1. 陳薇暄,陳又菱,孫之元(2020)。行動社群應用軟體融入美感教育活動對大學生的美感經驗與情境興趣之影響：以Instagram為例。數位學習科技期刊，12(2)，1-24。
2. 孫良誠(2022)。教保服務人員美感經驗教學量表建構。藝術教育研究，43，1-30。
3. 蕭佳純、張原誠(2016)。學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力：教師創造力教學有效嗎？。教育實踐與研究，29(2)，65-104。