题名

手機版團隊協作工具之使用性評估

并列篇名

The Usability Testing of Mobile Version of the Team Communication Platforms

作者

余佳穎(Chia-yin Yu)；陳宜(Yi Chen)

关键词

團隊協作工具 ； 手機應用程式 ； 使用性評估 ； team communication platforms (TCPS) ； mobile application ； usability testing

期刊名称

設計研究學報

卷期/出版年月

12期（2019 / 10 / 01）

页次

65 - 80

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

團隊協作工具能協助使用者有效規範專案內容，手機版的團隊協作工具應考量用戶在團隊溝通過程中的使用性，且設計出符合使用者操作直覺的介面。本研究探討團隊協作工具的發展、使用性評估方法，以及智慧型手機的操作等理論；透過樣本收集、用戶訪談與情境故事法，進行三款手機版的團隊協作工具-JANDI、asana與Slack的使用性評估。結果顯示操作JANDI時，完成任務的總時數較長（31分36秒）、asana其次（27分14秒）、Slack最短（19分42秒）。根據研究結果，本研究歸納出手機版團隊協作平台的操作形式與設計建議，作為設計師在介面規劃上的設計參考：（1）加入引導式說明介面；（2）加入專案進度／時程一覽表；（3）新增還原機制；（4）優化待辦事項介面；（5）提升介面切換的流暢度。
英文摘要

Team communication platforms can help users effectively standardize the content of the project. While designing the mobile version of the team communication platforms, designers should consider users' need during the team communication process, and design the interface which meets users' intuition. In this study, we conducted a usability testing through user interviews and scenario method, to evaluate the usability of JANDI, asana, and Slack. The results showed that when participants were operating JANDI, the among of time to complete the task was 31m36s, asana was 27m14s, and Slack was 19m42s. According to the results, we summarized the operation forms and design suggestions of the mobile version of the team communication platforms, for designers' references in the interface design: (1) add onboarding; (2) add the project schedule / timeline; (3) add undo function; (4) optimize the interface of to-do list; (5) improve the smoothness when of switching interface.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. 唐玄輝,林穎謙(2011)。情境故事法運用於跨領域合作的問題與影響。設計學報，16(3)，21-44。
    連結：
  2. Anders, A.(2016).Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices.International Journal of Business Communication,53,224-261.
  3. Anderson, K. E.(2016).Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: picking up the Slack in communication and collaboration.Library Hi Tech News,33(9),6-9.
  4. Handel, M. J.(2011).mHealth (mobile health)-using Apps for health and wellness.Explore,7(4),256-261.
  5. Hoober, S. (2013) How Do Users Really Hold Mobile Devices? Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2013/02/how-do-users-really-hold-mobile-devices.php
  6. Jewell, L. N.,Reitz, H. J.(1981).Group effectiveness in organizations.Glenview, Ill.:Scott, Foresman.
  7. Lewis, T. L.,Wyatt, J. C.(2014).mHealth and mobile medical Apps: A framework to assess risk and promote safer use.Journal of Medical Internet Research,16(9),e210.
  8. Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
  9. Nielsen, J.(1993).Usability Engineering.Boston:Academic Press.
  10. Stoyanov, S. R.,Hides, L.,Kavanagh, D. J.,Zelenko, O.,Tjondronegoro, D.,Mani, M.(2015).Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth,3(1),e27.
  11. 林明慧(2009)。團隊管理原理與方法。經濟師，9，220-221。
  12. 張悟非(1992)。從認知心理的觀點來探討視覺資訊設計的方向。工業設計，76，2-11。
  13. 黃麗芬(2001)。台北市，國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所。
print cancel