團體督導中影響學校輔導教師學習之因素初探

A Preliminary Examination of Factors Affecting School Counselors' Learning in Group Supervision

蔡秀玲(Shiou-Ling Tsai)

助益因素 ； 阻礙因素 ； 團體督導 ； 學校輔導教師

輔導季刊

53卷3期（2017 / 09 / 01）

20 - 30

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討學校輔導教師進行團體督導過程中，所知覺影響其專業學習的因素，包括有助益的因素與阻礙因素。本研究邀請到十二位受督導者，進行深度訪談。研究結果發現團體督導過程中影響受督導者專業學習的助益因素包括督導者的介入、成員的互動與團體歷程要素三個主要範疇。督導者的「建議與教導」、「示範」、「引導探問」、「支持與分享」有助於受督導者的學習。成員互動中，有助學習的因素包含「成員彼此討論回饋的啟發」、「成員的同理和支持」、「成員相似經驗的學習」、「督導者和成員對話的觀察學習」。團體歷程要素中，有助學習的因素包括「開放的團體氣氛」與「清楚團體督導的進行方式」。阻礙因素則以「成員彼此不熟悉」、「受督導者的分心與焦慮」，以及「團體督導時間有限」為主要阻礙受督導者專業學習的因素。本研究根據上述發現加以討論，並針對團體督導實務與未來研究提供具體建議。

1. 吳秀碧(2012)。受督者知覺有益學習的督導關係內涵之探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，33，87-118。
   連結：
2. 許育光(2011)。國小輔導教師之實務培訓與督導需求初探。教育實踐與研究，24(2)，99-127。
   連結：
3. 許育光(2011)。碩士層級實習學校諮商員督導團體之關切議題、學習因素與餐與經驗分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，31，61-100。
   連結：
4. 許維素,蔡秀玲(2008)。高中職輔導教師焦點解決團體督導成效之研究。教育心理學報，39(4)，603-622。
   連結：
5. Agnew, T.,Vaught, C. C.,Getz, H. G.,Fortune, J.(2000).Peer group clinical supervision program fosters confidence and professionalism.Professional School Counseling,4(1),6-12.
6. Bernard J. M.,Goodyear, R.(2004).Fundamentals of clinical supervision.Boston:Pearson Education.
7. Bradley, L. J.(Ed.),Ladany, N.(Ed.)(2000).Counselor supervision.Philadelphia, PA:Brunner-Routledge.
8. Carter, J. W.,Enyedy, K. C.,Goodyear, R. K.,Arcinue, F.,Puri, N. N.(2009).Concept mapping of the events supervisees find helpful in group supervision.Training and Education in Professional Psychology,3(1),1-9.
9. Christensen, T. M.,Kline, W. B.(2001).Anxiety as a condition for learning in group supervision.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,26,385-396.
10. Christensen, T. M.,Kline, W. B.(2001).The qualitative exploration of processsensitive peer group supervision.Journal for specialists in group work,26(1),81-99.
11. Christensen, T. M.,Kline, W. B.(2000).A qualitative investigation of the process of group supervision with group counselors.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,25(4),376-393.
12. Enyedy, K. C.,Arcinue, F.,Purl, N. N.,Carter, J. W.,Goodyear, R. K.,Getzlman, M. A.(2003).Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,34(3),312-317.
13. Hillerbrand, E.(1989).Cognitive difference between experts and novices: Implication for group supervision.Journal of Counseling and Development,67,293-296.
14. Holloway, E. L.,Johnston, R.(1985).Group supervision: Widely practiced but poorly understood.Counselor Education and Supervision,24,332-340.
15. Holloway, E.L.(1995).Clinical Supervision: A Systems Approach.London:Sage Publication.
16. Linton, J. M.,Hedstrom, S. M.(2006).An exploratory qualitative investigation of group processes in group supervision: Perception of masters-level practicum students.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,31(1),51-72.
17. Linton, J.M.(2003).Apreliminary qualitative investigation of group processes in group supervision: Perspectives of master's level practicum students.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,28(3),215-226.
18. Linton, J.M.,Deuschle, C. J.(2006).Meeting school counselors' supervision needs Fourmodels of group supervision.Journal of School Counseling,4(6),1-27.
19. Mastoras, S. M.,Andrews, J. J.(2011).The supervisee experience of group supervision: Implications for research and practice.Training and Education in Professional Psychology,5(2),102-111.
20. McAuliffe, G. J.(1992).A case presentation approach to group supervision for community college counselors.Counselor Education and supervision,31,163-174.
21. Oberman, A.(2005).Effective clinical supervision for professional school counselors.Guidance & Counseling,20(3),147-151.
22. Ögren, M. L.,Sundin, E. C.(2009).Group supervision in psychology: Main findings from a Swedish research project on psychotherapy supervision in a group formant.British Journal of Guidance & Counseling,37(2),129-139.
23. Pan, J. D.,Deng, L. F.,Tsai, S.(2008).Evaluating the use of reflective counseling group supervision for military counselors in Taiwan.Research on Social Work Practice,18,346-355.
24. Peterson, J.,Deuschle, C.(2006).A model for supervising school counseling students without teaching experience.Counselor Education and Supervision,45(4),267-281.
25. Ray, D.,Altekruse, M.(2000).Effectiveness of group supervision versus combined group and individual supervision.Counselor Education & Supervision,40(1),19-31.
26. Starling, P.,Baker, S.(2000).Structured peer group practicum supervision: Supervisees’ perceptions of supervision theory.Counselor Education and Supervision,39,162-177.
27. Thomas, S.(2005).The school counselor alumni peer consultation group.Counselor Education and Supervision,45(1),16-29.
28. Walsh, B. B.,Gillespie, C. K.,Greer, J. M.,Eanes, B. E.(2002).Influence of dyadic mutuality on counselor trainee willingness to self-disclosure clinical mistakes to supervisors.The Clinical Supervisor,21(2),83-98.
29. Walter, C. A.,Young, T. M.(1999).Combining individual and group supervision in educating for the social work profession.The Clinical Supervisor,18,73-89.
30. Werstlein, P. O.(1994).,未出版
31. Westwood, M. J.(1989).Group supervision for counselors-in-training.Canadian Journal of Counselling,23,348-353.
32. Wilbur, M. P.,Roberts-Wilbur, J.,Hart, G. M.,Morris, J. R.,Betz, B. L.(1994).Structured group supervision(SGS): A pilot study.Counselor Education and Supervision,33,262-279.
33. 施香如(2015)。諮商實務課程團體督導之學習經驗初探：循環發展督導模式及反饋小組的應用。中華輔導與諮商學報，43，127-157。
34. 施香如(2010)。“團體督導”與“過程回顧”—新手團體領導者的督導型式與媒介應用經驗。輔導季刊，46(1)，25-31。
35. 徐西森,黃素雲(2007).諮商督導：理論與研究.台北:心理出版社.

1. 陳志賢(2023)。強化媒材使用與系統合作能力之團體督導對輔導教師之影響。臺灣諮商心理學報，11(1)，1-31。
2. 盧鴻文,林淑華,吳芝儀(2020)。中等學校專任輔導教師督導實務規劃之芻議。輔導季刊，56(4)，1-10。
3. (2024)。學士層級團體諮商實習課程訓練效果之分析研究。輔導與諮商學報，46(1)，1-24。