應用信息空間模型分析貪污層級性與互動性

Analyze the Strata and Interactions of Corruption Using the Information Space Model

10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2010.4(3)2

孫德華(Te-Hua Sun)

貪污 ； 信息空間 ； 層級性 ； 互動性 ； Corruption ； Information Space ； Stratum ； Interaction

人文社會科學研究

4卷3期（2010 / 09 / 01）

33 - 60

繁體中文

貪污事件本身受到政治、經濟、文化和社會之影響，但貪污的成因與變遷過程在各國之歷程均不相同，所以不能以籠統的概念去研究貪污。本文目的，進一步釐清貪污本身所具有的特質，如層級性與層級間互動性，對貪污的研究將是有助益的。研究方法是以信息空間（Information space，或I-space）的分析做為研究貪污特質的方法。貪污是一種知識和信息，貪污在信息空間中不同的位置有不同的特點，這是它的層級性。信息空間所有的層級間的互動，或者說循環性，這個不斷交易的互動過程它受到制度、文化的影響，而具有互動的順序性。本研究有以下三個結論：一是官僚體系可區分為高層領導、高階官僚與低階官僚，並以之與社會體系對應。二是從官僚體系中從各階層間的互動可分成二類，由下向上的侍從關係和由上往下的恩庇關係。三是官僚體系中五個類別角色，它們的互動影響的順序，依序是高層領導、恩庇關係、侍從關係、尋租及投機。從信息空間模型釐清貪污具有層級性，及層級間互動的順序性，可以做為以後研究的基礎。

Although corruption events are influenced by politics, economics, culture, and society factors, their causes and processes are varied from country to country. It is, therefore, improper to study corruption using undefined conceptions. The purpose of this article is to further describe the characteristics of corruption, such as the interactions between strata, which, in general, will be helpful to the study of corruption. And, in this article, we adopt the analysis of information space (I-space) as a research method. Corruption, in a way, is a kind of knowledge and message. The interactions between the strata (or the circling) in the information space is a non-stop process influenced by institutions and culture. Three conclusions are drawn in this article. First, a bureaucratic system can be divided into 3 levels--leader, higher and lower bureaucrats, and can be linked to the society. Secondly, 2 categories of interaction can be found between bureaucratic strata: one from down to up and the other from up to down. Thirdly, five different roles can be found in a bureaucratic stratum. They, by influence orders, are: the leader, the significant favor relationship, the client, the rent-seeking relationship and the gambler. We further found that the order and strata among them can be used as a foundation for further researches.

1. 中央社（2010 年9 月30 日）。星貪官詐領2.4 億被控逾200 罪名。中國時報，A13 版。
2. Coase, Ronald. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 15, 368-425.
3. Ackerman, Susan Rose(1999).Corruption and Government.New York:Cambridge University press.
4. Ades, Alberto,Rafael, Di. Tella(1995).National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Competitiveness Arithmetic.Oxford:University of Oxford Photocopy.
5. Boisot, Max H.(1995).Information Space-A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture.New York:Routledge.
6. Buchanan, J. M.,Wagner, R. E.(1977).Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes.New York:Academic Press.
7. Clements, Benedict J.,Hugounenq, Rejane,Schwartz, Gerd(1995).Government Subsidies: Concepts, International trends and Reform Options.Washington, DC:International Money Fund.
8. Coast, Ronald H.(1960).The Problem of social cost.Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44.
9. Cooter, D. Robert.,Thomas, S. Ulen(2002).Law and Economics.Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley.
10. De Soto, H.(1989).The Other Paths: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World.New York:Harper and Row.
11. Ekelund, R.,Tollison, R.(1981).Marcantilism as a Rent-seeking Society.Texas:Texas A & M University Press.
12. Eliassen, K.(ed.),Kooiman, J.(ed.)(1993).Managing public Management.London:Sage.
13. Elliott, Kimberly Ann.ed.、李憲譯、劉勇譯、劉斌譯(1999)。腐敗與全球經濟。北京:北京大學出版社。
14. Guy, Peters, B.(2001).The Politics of Bureaucracy.London:Routledge.
15. Huntington, Samuel P.(1968).Political Order in Changing Societies.New Haven:Yale University Press.
16. Hutchcroft, Paul D.(1997).The Politics of Privilege: Assessing the Impact of Rents, Corruption, and Clentelism on Third World Development.Political Corruption,Great Britain:
17. Jagannathan, N.(1987).Informal Markets in Developing Countries.U.K.:Oxford University Press.
18. Jain, Arvind K.(2001).Corruption: A review.Journal of Economic Surveys,15(1),71-121.
19. Kooiman, J.(ed.)(1993).Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions.London:Sage.
20. Mauro, Paolo(1993).The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure.Washington, DC:International Money Fund.
21. Mauro, Paolo(1997).Why Worry about Corruption.International Monetary Fund-Economic Issues,6,1-13.
22. North, Douglass(1981).Structure and Change in Economic History.New York:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc..
23. Nye, J. S.(1967).Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.American Political Science Review,41(2),567-572.
24. Rowley(ed.),Tollison(ed.),Tullock(ed.)(1988).Life Among the Triangles and Trapezoids.London:Edward Elgar.
25. Rowley, C. K.(ed.),Tollison, R. D.(ed.),Tullock, G.(ed.)(1988).The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking.Boston:Kluwer.
26. Rowley, C. R. Tollision(ed.),Tullock, G.(ed.)(1988).The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking.Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Shleifer, Andrei,Vishny, Robert(1993).Corruption.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(3),599-617.
28. Theobald, Robin(1990).Is Corruption a Problem?.London:Macmillan LTD.
29. Tullock, G.(1984).The Backward Society: Static Inefficiency, Rent Seeking, and the Rule of Law.The Theory of Public Choice-Ⅱ,Ann Arbor:
30. Williamson, O. E.(1975).Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.New York:The Free Press.
31. Yao, Shuntian(2002).Privilege and Corruption: The Problems of China's Socialist Market Economy.American Journal of Economics and Sociology,61(1),279-299.
32. 王曉丹(2007)。印度社會觀察。北京:世界知識。
33. 何增科(2002)。反腐新路。北京:中央編譯出版社。
34. 孫德華(2002)。成功大學政治經濟學研究所。
35. 曾楚宏、林丹明、朱仁宏(2006)。信息空間的組織學習與知識轉化。商業經濟與管理，2006(9)，29-34。
36. 黃紹倫編、李明堃編(1993)。社會學新論。台北:台灣商務印書?。
37. 楊洪常(2000)。政治發展還是政治衰敗：政治腐敗效應之爭。政治科學論叢，12，131-160。
38. 羅莉(2006)。新知識及信息的生產和擴散的有效動態模式分析。四川師範大學學報（社會科學版），31(2)，139-144。