朱熹對程頤易學思想之開展

Zhu-Xi Developed Yi Study of Cheng-Yi

10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2015.9(2)5

劉原池(Yuan-Chih Liu)

宋代 ； 朱熹 ； 易學思想 ； 程頤 ； 體用一源 ； Song Dynasty ； Zhu-Xi ； thoughts of Yi study ； Cheng-Yi ； One origin for principles and application

人文社會科學研究

9卷2期（2015 / 06 / 30）

92 - 120

繁體中文

程頤易學的特點是以義理解《易》，直接從《易》中發揮易理，而不計較卜筮和象數。他認為《易》是載道之書，天理、天道便包含在《易》之中。而朱熹把《周易》看作一部卜筮之說，要求學者先以卜筮占決之意來領會聖人作《易》時的教人占卜之本義。由於程朱對《易》之性質的理解不同，故其解《易》之方與解《易》之例也隨之而異。朱熹批評了程頤等易學之義理派只重義理的發揮，輕忽以至不講《易》的占卜本義的治《易》方法。他主張在通得經文本旨的前提下推說義理，並把象、占、理結合起來。「體用一源，顯微無間」乃是程頤易學哲學的精髓，朱熹在此一基礎之上，進一步對「體用一源」加以闡發，以之作為易學哲學的根本宗旨，提出了「太極為理」說，從而完成了建立理學派以理為本的哲學體系的任務。

The feature of Cheng-Yi's Yi study is to interpret the book, Yi by connotation, to elucidate the argumentative philosophy directly from the book, but not to emphasize divination and image-numerology. He thought that Yi was the book of conveying Universe principles and Universe principles were embraced in the book. However, Zhu-Xi thought of Yi as the book of divination, and demanded the learned to comprehend the initial meaning of divination first by the divination that the saint wrote the book, Yi. Due to Zhu-Xi's and Cheng-Yi's different understanding towards the quality of the book, Yi, they had different methods and styles in how to interpret it. Zhu-Xi criticized that Cheng-Yi and his school only emphasized the explanation of the argumentative philosophy, but neglected the method of how to divine in the book, Yi. He suggested deducing the argumentative philosophy from the original meaning of the text and combining image, divination and the argumentative philosophy. ＂One origin for principles and application＂ is the essence of Cheng-Yi's Yi study. Based on Cheng-Yi's theory of ＂One origin for principles and application＂, Zhu-Xi elucidated it further; used it as the radical aim of his Yi study; put forward the theory, ＂the supreme ultimate is the Universe principle＂; and completed the task of establishing the philosophy based on the Universe principle that is emphasized by Neo-Confucian Rationalistic School.

1. 宋朱熹(1996)。朱熹集。四川:四川教育出版社。
2. 宋朱熹(1975)。周易本義。台北:華正書局。
3. 宋朱熹(1979)。朱文公文集。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
4. 宋朱熹、朱傑人編、嚴佐之編、劉永翔編(2002)。朱子全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
5. 宋朱熹、陳俊民校編(2000)。朱子文集。台北:德富文教基金會。
6. 宋周敦頤(1978)。周子全書。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
7. 宋程頤、宋程顥、王孝魚點校(2004)。二程集。北京:中華書局。
8. 宋黎靖德(1986)。朱子語類。北京:中華書局。
9. 朱伯崑(2000)。易學哲學史。北京:華夏出版社。
10. 李蘭芝(1997)。朱熹的易學解釋學。周易研究，1997(2)，58。
11. 姜海軍(2007)。程頤的易學解釋學探研。洛陽大學學報，22(3)，52。
12. 張善文、黃壽棋(2000)。周易譯註。臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司。
13. 鄭萬耕(2002)。程朱理學的體用一源說。孔子研究，2002(4)，38。

1. 陳振崑(2017)。朱子理學的易理傳承與體用論的形成。哲學與文化，44(3)，95-109。