從協力創新析探社區空氣污染治理之發展

Exploring the Development of Collaborative Innovation on Air Pollution Governance in Local Communities

10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.202206_16(2).4

謝儲鍵(Chu-Chien Hsieh)

協力創新 ； 社區參與 ； 空氣汙染 ； 網絡治理 ； Collaborative innovation ； community participation ； air pollution ； network governance

人文社會科學研究

16卷2期（2022 / 06 / 01）

97 - 127

繁體中文

臺灣如何在面對空氣汙染的挑戰時，有效結合多元行動者之研究已成為協力治理的重要課題。有別於傳統的遊行倡議途徑，多元利害關係人希冀以社區為基礎思考整合既有資源及創新策略以達到環境創新治理。本文透過協力創新概念連結網絡治理框架來分析臺中龍井區及雲林麥寮鄉如何以領導、網絡、話語權等概念面對空氣汙染的困境。本研究方法以田野調查和深度訪談途徑進入至當地社區蒐集資料並進行訪談，瞭解行動者在社區中如何建立夥伴關係、促進公民參與，以及制定協力創新行動等面向。研究分析有以下三點發現：一、基層官僚式的領導無法改善空汙治理的知識管理及教育群眾形塑在地話語權；二、公民組織是社區資訊傳遞與教育民眾專業知識的中心者，同時也是橋接多元行動者網絡的掮客；三、公民科學及公民參與途徑可連結在地資源與網絡行動以創造協力創新策略。

While the air pollution governance in Taiwan is a challenge, it is an important issue to connect the multiple actors. Compared to the traditional approach of policy advocacy, the stakeholders have integrated resources to establish collaborative relationships. This study aims to analyze the cooperation of environmental governance through the concept of collaborative innovation via field study and in-depth interviews to understand how actors build partnerships, promote civic participation, and formulate collaborative innovation actions in the community. There are three findings in this study: First, the leadership of street-level bureaucracy cannot improve the knowledge management of air pollution control and educate to shape local discourse for community innovation; second, the civil organizations are brokers to deliver information bridging the network of multiple actors; third, citizen science and citizen participation are considered as an influential and practical strategy to empower local people, and connect resources and networks for collaborative innovation governance.

1. 李長晏,曾淑娟(2009)。北臺與高高屏區域聯盟治理營運之比較。臺灣民主季刊，6(2)，1-60。
   連結：
2. 杜文苓,施佳良(2019)。挑戰空汙：初探社區行動科學的在地實踐。傳播研究與實踐，9(1)，1-32。
   連結：
3. 杜文苓,施佳良,蔡宛儒(2014)。傳統農業縣的石化課題：檢視六輕環境爭議與治理困境。台灣土地研究，17(1)，59-90。
   連結：
4. 周睦怡,熊慧嵐,陳東升(2018)。在地社會創新網絡：以人文創新與社會實踐計畫在地實作為例。臺灣政治學刊，22(2)，147-202。
   連結：
5. 林郁欽,王秋原(2005)。從環境識覺觀點分析加油站設置的鄰避效果──臺北都會區的個案研究。華岡地理學報，18，31-62。
   連結：
6. 林鴻揚(2019)。地方如何動不起來？六輕的科學戰爭與麥寮人的信任地理學。地理學報，93，35-80。
   連結：
7. 陳志瑋(2004)。行政課責與地方治理能力的提昇。政策研究學報，4，23-46。
   連結：
8. Agranoff, Robert,McGuire, Michael(2004).Another Look at Bargaining and Negotiating in Intergovernmental Management.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(4),495-512.
9. An, Xiaomi,Deng, Hepu,Chao, Lemen,Bai, Wenlin(2014).Knowledge Management in Supporting Collaborative Innovation Community Capacity Building.Journal of Knowledge Management,18(3),574-590.
10. Ansell, Chris,Gash, Alison(2008).Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18,543-571.
11. Anthony, King(Ed.)(1978).The New American Political System.Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
12. Arniani, Marta,Badii, Atta,De Liddo, Anna,Georgi, Silke,Passani, Antonella(2014).Collective awareness platform for sustainability and social innovation: An introduction.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission, Collective Awareness Platforms for Sustainability and Social Innovation (CAPS).
13. Bonney, Rick,Philips, Tina B,Ballard, Heidi,Enck, Jody(2016).Can citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science?.Public Understanding of Science,25(1),2-16.
14. Boucher, David(1993).Human Conduct, History, and Social Science in the Works of R. G. Collingwood and Michael Oakeshott.New Literary History,24(3),697-717.
15. Castro-Arce, Karina,Vanclay, Frank(2020).Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives.Journal of Rural Studies,74,45-54.
16. Cavalier, Darlene(Ed.),Zachary, Eric Kennedy(Ed.)(2016).The Rightful Place of Science Citizen Science.Tempe, AZ:Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes.
17. Chatzichristos, Georgios,Nagopoulos, Nikolaos(2020).Social entrepreneurship and institutional and sustainability: Insights from an embedded social enterprise.VOLUNTAS,31,484-493.
18. Conrad, Cathy,Hilchey, Krista(2011).A Review of Citizen Science and Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,176,273-291.
19. Considine, Mark,Lewis, Jenny M.,Alexander, Damon(2009).Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Eggers, William D.,Singh, Shalabh Kumar(2009).The public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government.MA:Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Institute.
21. Eizaguirre, Santiago,Parés, Marc(2019).Communities Making Social Change from Below. Social Innovation and Democratic Leadership in Two Disenfranchised Neighbourhoods in Barcelona.Urban Research and Practice,12(2),173-191.
22. Fong, Christina,Bowles, Samuel,Gintis, Herbert(2005).Behavioural Motives for Income Redistribution.Australian Economic Review,38(3),285-297.
23. Grimm, Robert,Fox, Christopher,Baines, Susan,Albertson, Kevin(2013).Social Innovation, an Answer to Contemporary Societal Challenges? Locating the Concept in Theory and Practice.Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research,26(4),436-455.
24. Jiang, Qijun,Kresin, Frank,Bregt, Arnold,Kooistra, Lammert,Pareschi, Emma,van Putten, Edith,Volten, Hester,Wesseling, Joost(2016).Citizen Sensing for Improved Urban Environmental Monitoring.Journal of Sensors,2016,1-9.
25. Jones, Candace,Hesterly, William S.,Borgatti, Stephen P.(1997).A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms.The Academy of Management Review,22(4),911-945.
26. Klijn, Erik-Hans,Skelcher, Chris(2007).Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not? Four conjectures and their implications.Public Administration,85(3),587-608.
27. Laumann, O. Edward,Knoke, David(1987).The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains.Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
28. Manzini, Ezio(2012).Error-Friendliness: How to Deal With the Future Scarcest Resource: the Environmental, Social, Economic Security. That is, How to Design Resilient Socio Technical Systems.Architectural Design,82(4),56-61.
29. Mook, Laurie(Ed.),Quarter, Jack(Ed.),Ryan, Sherida(Ed.)(2010).Researching the Social Economy.Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
30. Moulaert, Frank,Swyngedouw, Erik,Martinelli, Flavia,Gonzalez, Sara(2005).Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation.Urban Studies,42(11),1969-1990.
31. Mulgan, Geoff(2006).The process of social innovation.Innovations Technology Governance Globalization,1(2),145-162.
32. Neumeier, S.(2016).Social Innovation in Rural Development: Identifying the Key Factors of Success.The Geography Journal,183(1),34-46.
33. Nikula, J.,Kopoteva, I.,Niska, M.,Butkeviciene, E.,Granberg, L.(2011).Social Innovations and Social Partnerships in Finland, Russia and Lithuania.Finland:Finnish Centre for Russian and Eastern European Studies.
34. Ottinger, Gwen(2012).Changing Knowledge, Local Knowledge, and Knowledge Gaps: STS Insights into Procedural Justice.Science Technology and Human Values,38(2),250-270.
35. Ottinger, Gwen(2013).Refining Expertise: How Responsible Engineers Subverte Environmental Justice Challenges.New York:New York University Press.
36. Provan, Keith. G.,Milward, Brinton H.(1995).A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems.Administrative Science Quarterly,40(1),1-33.
37. Randhawa, Krithika,Wilden, Ralf,Hohberger, Jan(2016).A Bibliometric Review of Open Innovation: Setting a Research Agenda.Journal of Product Innovation Management,33(6),750-772.
38. Rhodes, R. A. W.,Marsh, David(1992).New directions in the study of policy networks.European Journal of Political Research,21(1-2),181-205.
39. Sørensen, Eva,Torging, Jacob(2017).Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks.The American Review of Public Administration,47(7),826-839.
40. Sørensen, Eva,Torging, Jacob(2011).Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector.Administration and Society,87,234-258.
41. Wright, Eric O.(2010).Envisioning Real Utopias.London:Verso.
42. 中央通訊社（2021）。〈空氣品質西半部淪陷臺中基隆雲林高雄 5 電廠降載減排〉。中央通訊社網站，網址：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202102060041.aspx。點閱日期：2021 年 6 月 8 日。
43. 文化部（2009）。〈社區參與的定義〉。臺灣社區通網站，網址：https://communitytaiwan.moc.gov.tw/Item/Detail/%E3%80%8C%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E3%80%8D%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%9A%E7%BE%A9。點閱日期：2021 年 7 月 21 日。
44. 王乙徹、洪舜南、曾雪蒨（2020）。〈龍井人命賤活該罹癌？中火空污每天 5.6 元「補助」〉。蘋果新聞網網站，網址：https://tw.appledaily.com/local/20200226/W3ZQ7IIH2ZO77WVL7JZPS4ZQR4/。點閱日期：2021 年 10 月 30 日。
45. 王郁倫（2021）。〈臺灣電價過低、綠能不足！他眼中的高科技產業「5 要」與「2個迷惑」〉。數位時代網站，網址：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/64562/th-tung-2021-5-industry-issue。點閱日期：2021 年 10 月 28 日。
46. 李育琴（2017）。〈「能源轉型白皮書」南部啟動，聚焦公民電廠、耗能產業、空污減煤〉。環境足跡網站，網址：https://thaubing.gcaa.org.tw/blog/post/175。點閱日期：2021 年 4 月 29 日。
47. 杜文苓(2019)。公民科學、社區監測與環境知識建構。人文與社會科學簡訊，21(1)，12-19。
48. 張已亷（2019）。〈想落地生根、想看藍天白雲，為何那麼難？〉。地球公民基金會網站，網址：https://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/3492。點閱日期：2021 年 3月 20 日。
49. 張聰秋（2020）。〈全台最髒！彰化颳空污風暴，大城鄉傍晚亮橘色警報〉。自由時報網站，網址：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3229567。點閱日期：2021 月 10 月 27 日。
50. 雲林縣政府（2017）。〈衝破霧霾、找回藍天，雲林縣長李進勇參加臺中場反空汙大遊行〉。雲林縣政府網站，網址：https://www.yunlin.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1244&s=220022。點閱日期：2021 年 11 月 2 日。
51. 雲林縣政府戶政（2020）。〈統計資訊〉。雲林縣政府戶政網站，網址：https://household.yunlin.gov.tw/popul07/index.aspx?Parser=99,7,41。點閱日期：2021 年10 月 28 日。
52. 綠色和平（2019）。〈什麼是 COP 25？它跟臺灣的我們有什麼關係？〉。綠色和平網站，網址：https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/11060/%e4%bb%80%e9%ba%bc%e6%98%afcop25%ef%bc%9f%e5%ae%83%e8%b7%9f%e8%87%ba%e7%81%a3%e7%9a%84%e6%88%91%e5%80%91%e6%9c%89%e4%bb%80%e9%ba%bc%e9%97%9c%e4%bf%82%ef%bc%9f/。點閱日期：2021 年5 月 23 日。
53. 臺中市政府民政局（2020）。〈人口管理統計平台〉。臺中市政府民政局網站，網址：https://demographics.taichung.gov.tw/Demographic/WebPage/TCCReport13.html?s=13878532。點閱日期：2021 年 11 月 2 日。
54. 劉弘煌(2016)。都市型社區的特性與培力策略。社區發展季刊，154，205-214。