题名

實施融合教育之托兒所教師教學困擾之研究

并列篇名

A Study of Teachers' Teaching Disturbance of Implementing Inclusive Education in Nursery School

DOI

10.7067/JMU.201009.0125

作者

汪慧玲(Huei-Ling Wang);沈佳生(Chia-Shen Shen)

关键词

托兒所 ; 融合教育 ; 教學困擾 ; nursery school ; inclusive education ; teaching disturbance

期刊名称

美和學報

卷期/出版年月

29卷2期(2010 / 09 / 01)

页次

125 - 147

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討托兒所教師在融合班教學困擾之現況,並比較不同背景變項的托兒所教師在教學困擾上的差異情形。主要研究工具爲研究者自編之問卷調查,作爲蒐集量化資料的工具,並以屏東縣公、私立托兒所178位教師爲研究對象。將研究所得結果以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗及單因子變異數分析等統計方法加以分析。根據資料分析結果,本研究所得的結論如下:1、整體而言,托兒所教師在融合班的教學困擾,得分情形趨近中高程度。2、在托兒所教師自評在融合班教學困擾的各層面,依平均數高低排列,由高至低依序爲:課程與教學、班級經營、專業知能及支援系統。3、特教背景、任教經驗、班級身心障礙幼兒人數,對托兒所教師在融合班的教學困擾有顯著差異。最後,研究者根據本研究的結果提出若干建議,以供學前教育機構之參考。

英文摘要

The purposes of this study were to investigate the teachers' teaching disturbance in the nursery inclusive class. Meanwhile the study also examined the differences of the teaching disturbance among the teachers with different backgrounds as the variables. A survey questionnaire served as the research instrument for this study. Participants were randomly selected from 178 public and private nursery inclusive classes in Pingtung areas. The valid data were analyzed by frequency, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and one-way ANOVA. The major results included: 1 .The teachers' teaching disturbance of the inclusive education was moderate to high in general. 2. Based on the result of the teachers' self-evaluation and perception, the overall mean values of the disturbance were ranked as the followings: the curriculum and teaching, the classroom management, the professional knowledge, and the supporting system. 3. The teachers with special education background, the different teaching experiences, and the different number of disable children in class have significant difference on the teaching disturbance. According to the results, some concrete suggestions were brought up as references for other preschool settings.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 教育部〈2009〉。教育部特殊教育通報網。2009年03月15日,取自http://www.set.edu.tw/frame.asp
  2. Adams, A.(2003).The challenge of inclusion.Journal of Early Intervention,49(2),182-193.
  3. Dowdy, C. A.(2000).Collaboration in an inclusive classroom: A passion for action research.Teaching Exceptional Children,43(2),26-34.
  4. Dunlap. G.(2001).Inclusion strategies for students with learning and behavior problems.Behavior Modification,29(1),162-184.
  5. Gartner, A.(2003).Inclusive education for all students.The Journal of Special Education,36(2),212-233.
  6. Johnson, L. J.(2001).The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators.Remedial and Special Education,31(2),104-116.
  7. Lindsay, G.(2003).Inclusive education: a critical perspective.British Journal of Special Education,30(1),3-12.
  8. Mary, K.,Kenneth, E.(2000)."I believe in inclusion, but...": Regular education early childhood teacher's perception of successful inclusion.Journal of Research in Childhood Education,14,161-172.
  9. Ross, F. C.,Was, I.(2003).Best academic practices for inclusive practices.Focus on Exceptional Children,37(2),31-46.
  10. Villa, R. A.(2001).The challenge of inclusion.Journal of Early Intervention,39(3),179-194.
  11. Wesley, P. W.(2002).The advantages of inclusion for students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,57,181-190.
  12. York, J.(2003).Integrating young children with disabilities in preschool: Problems and promise.Young Children,58(2),68-75.
  13. 王天苗(2003)。學前融合教育實施的問題與對策─以台北市國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊,25,1-25。
  14. 吳淑美(2007)。融合班的理念與實務。台北:心理。
  15. 李蕙蘭(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
  16. 林美香(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中,國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所。
  17. 林貴美(2001)。融合教育與學校改造。融合教育論文集
  18. 邱上真(2002)。特殊教育導論。台北:心理。
  19. 胡永崇(2001)。融合教育意義、爭議與配合措施。融合教育論文集
  20. 曹純瓊(2001)。學前融合教育。台北:啟英文化。
  21. 許碧勳(2001)。幼稚園實施融合教育之研究。台北市立師範學院院報,32,451-484。
  22. 傅秀媚(2002)。初任融合班教師班級經營。特殊教育叢書,9102,110-127。
  23. 黃瑛綺(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東,國立台東師範學院教育研究所。
  24. 溫惠君(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學研究所。
  25. 劉博允(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投,國立暨南大學比較教育研究所。
  26. 蔡文龍(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
  27. 蔡昆瀛(2000)。談學校融合教育之相關法規與配套措施。國教新知,47(2),12-17。
  28. 鍾梅菁(2002)。學前融合教育實施之探討─以融合班為例。新竹師院學報,15,429-542。
  29. 鍾梅菁(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
  30. 蘇燕華(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 曾淑賢(2021)。學前融合教育課程調整模式之探討。教育實踐與研究,34(2),125-147。