指數股票型基金與共同基金交易成本及績效之研究

The Study of Trading Cost and Performance on Exchange Traded Fund and Mutual Fund

鍾紹熙(Shao-Hsi Chung)；邱暢輝(Chang-Hui Chiu)

交易成本 ； 基金績效 ； 指數股票型基金 ； 共同基金 ； trading cost ； fund performance ； exchange traded fund (ETF) ； mutual fund

美和學報

32卷2期（2013 / 11 / 01）

1 - 12

繁體中文

本研究目的為探討指數股票型基金（ETF）與共同基金的交易成本及績效之差異性分析、共同基金的交易成本與績效之相關性分析。基金的分類方式，係參考台大財金所教授邱顯比與李存修（1997）所提出的五類，包括一般型、科技型、中小型、中概股型、價值型。本文基金資料取自中華民國證券投資信託暨顧問商業同業公會，期間為2006年1月至2010年12月，並以t檢定與Pearson相關係數等方法驗證研究假說。研究結果發現，ETF與共同基金的交易成本存在差異性、ETF與共同基金的績效有部分類型存在差異性、共同基金的交易成本與績效間有部分類型存在相關性。本研究結果可提供投資人購買基金以及投信投顧公司發行基金的參考。

The purpose of this study is to explore the discrepancy of trading cost and performance between exchange traded fund (ETF) and mutual fund. Beisdes, the correlation analysis between trading cost and performance on mutual fund will also be examined. We use the method proposed by Professors Chiu, Hsien-Pi and Lee, Tsun-Hsiu (1997) of the Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University for the way of classification of the fund. The fund is categorized as five types as general type, technology type, small-medium size type, China-concept stock type and value type. The data of this paper is obtained from the funds for the period from January 2006 to December 2010, as published by the Securities Investment, Trust & Consulting Association of R.O.C. T-test and Pearson correlation coefficients are used to verify the research hypotheses. Findings of the study indicate significant variance exists on the trading cost between ETF and mutual fund. Significant negative correlation partly exists between trading cost and performance on mutual fund. Besides, significant variance also partly exists on performance between ETF and mutual fund. The results of this study can be offered to the investors' reference when they purchase the funds as well as for the investment trust consulting companies when they issue the funds.

1. 林佳靜(2004)。日本股票型基金與指數型金之分析。台灣金融財務季刊，5(3)，143-158。
   連結：
2. 台灣共同基金績效評比(1997)。關於評比。上網日期：2010年9月20日，取自http://140.112.111.12/about.jsp
3. 邱顯比與李存修(1997)。關於基金績金效評比之各項衡量指標，取自台灣共同基金績效評比網，http://140.112.111.12/about.jsp
4. Arnott, R. D.、Hsu, J. C.、West, J. M.、張竣堯譯(2010)。基本面指數投資策略：降低風險成本、增長投資回報的金融創新典範。台北市:財信。
5. Bernstein, W.、黃逸華譯(2009)。投資金律：建立獲利投資組合的四大關鍵和十四個關卡。臺北市:臉譜。
6. Berstein, W.、駱武昌譯(2008)。智慧型資產配置。台北市:寰宇。
7. Bogle, J. C.(1998).The implications of style analysis for mutual fund performance evaluation.Journal of Portfolio Management,24(4),34-42.
8. Bogle, J. C.(2002).An index fund fundamentalist.Journal of Portfolio Management,28(3),31-38.
9. Bogle, J. C.、帛宏譯(2002)。柏格談共同基金─明智投資人的新觀點。台北市:寰宇。
10. Carhart, M. M.(1997).On persistence in mutual fund performance.Journal of Finance,52(1),57-82.
11. Droms, W. G.,Walker, D. A.(1996).Mutual fund investment performance.Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance,36(3),347-363.
12. Droms, W. G.,Walker, D. A.(1995).Determinants of variation in mutual fund returns.Applied Financial Economics,5(6),383-389.
13. Elton, E. J.,Gruber, M. J.,Busse, J. A.(2004).Are investors rational? Choices among index funds.Journal of Finance,59(1),261-288.
14. Ippolito, R. A.(1989).Efficiency with costly information: A study of mutual fund performance, 1965-1984.Quarterly Journal of Economics,104(1),1-23.
15. Livingston, M.,O'neal, E. S.(1998).The cost of mutual fund distribution fees.Journal of Financial Research,21(2),205-218.
16. Malkiel, B. G.(2005).Reflections on the efficient market hypothesis: 30 years later.Financial Review,40(1),1-9.
17. Malkiel, B. G.(1995).Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991.Journal of Finance,52,549-572.
18. Malkiel, B. G.、林麗冠譯、楊美齡譯(2008)。漫步華爾街：超越股市漲跌的成功投資策略。臺北市:天下遠見。
19. Sharpe, W. F.(1966).Mutual fund performance.Journal of Business,39(1),119-138.
20. Wiseman, R.、洪慧芬譯(2008)。讓你瞬間看穿人心的怪咖心理學─史上最搞怪的心理學實驗報告。臺北市:漫遊者文化。
21. 杜玉雯(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班。
22. 理財工具及其應用編撰委員會編(2002)。理財工具及其應用。台北市:財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
23. 程榮椿(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班。
24. 劉宗聖(2009)。買指數型基金，就對了！。台北縣:大智通。
25. 賴昕祐(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。成功大學會計學系。