杜威、赫欽斯與羅蒂對博雅教育的不同看法及其對通識教育的啟示

The Different Perspectives of Liberal Education among Dewey, Hutchins, and Rorty and the Implications for General Education

10.6360/TJGE.201506_(15).0002

黃振豊(Chen-Li Huang)；何俊青(Chun-Ching Ho)

杜威 ； 通識教育 ； 博雅教育 ； 赫欽思 ； 羅蒂 ； Dewey ； general education ； liberal education ； Hutchins ； Rorty

通識教育學刊

15期（2015 / 06 / 01）

33 - 49

繁體中文

本文探究杜威、赫欽斯與羅蒂對博雅教育的不同看法及其對通識教育的啟示。研究透過文獻分析來釐清博雅教育的概念，以及杜威、赫欽斯、羅蒂三者對博雅教育的分殊見解。研究發現，博雅教育源於古希臘自由民教育，並歷經智識傳統與做中學的辯證，進而融入多元與圑結的觀念。其中，杜威強調學習者在與自然和社會環境的互動中，自然會產生學習的意義。赫欽斯則強調透過博雅科目之能力與思維訓練來培養理智的健全個體。羅蒂懷著對博雅教育的浪漫追求，期待博雅教學能使個體在多元的群體中，彼此分享所編織的夢想而使我們聯繫在一起。對通識教育的啟示在於：杜威做中學的理與赫欽斯理性觀在通識教育中可調和並用，並且透過羅蒂通識學習的圑結觀使我們在多元社會中共生共榮的圑結在一起。

This study investigates the implications for general education from the various perspectives on liberal education among John Dewey, Robert Maynard Hutchins, and Richard Rorty. I use literature review to clarify the concept of liberal education and the viewpoints of Dewey, Hutchins, and Rorty. I find that liberal education came from free man education in ancient Greece. It experienced the dialect between the intellectual tradition and the idea of learning by doing in modern time, and merged with the idea of plurality and the idea of solidarity in postmodern time. In the process, Dewey emphasized the learner's interaction with the social and natural situations to get the meaningful learning naturally. Hutchins emphasized liberal arts and intellectual reasoning to train the intellectual individual. Rorty held the romantic pursuing in liberal education, and he expected to share one's own dream in the plural community and bind us together. The implications for general education are as follows: The learning by doing idea of Dewey and the intellectual idea of Hutchins could work together in a harmony way. We need to develop the solidarity of coexistence and mutual prosperity in plural society through the idea of solidarity from Rorty's general studies.

1. 周珮儀(2006)。從父權荒野的放逐到親密母土的回歸。課程與教學季刊，9(4)，1-19。
   連結：
2. 施宜煌(2013)。全球化時代臺灣通識教育的因應策略。東亞論譠，480，53-66。
   連結：
3. 李鶴立：〈大學之道前途探憂〉，《中國時報》，1998.4.16，版47。
4. Dewey, J.. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Free Press, 1916.
5. Hutchins, R. M.. Education for Freedom. New York: Grove Press, 1936.
6. Harvard University. “General Education in a Free Society.” Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1945.
7. Postmodernism. “Postmodernism.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2015. Web. 18 Apr. 2015. 〈http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Postmodernism&oldid=656643356〉.
8. Ahrens, R.(Ed.),Volkmann, L.(Ed.)(1996).Why Literature Matters: Theories and Functions of Literature.Heidelberg:Winter.
9. Arcilla, R.V.(1995).For the Love of Perfection: Richard Rorty and Liberal Education.New York:Routledge.
10. Arcilla, R.V.(1991).Metaphysics in Education after Hutchins and Dewey.Teachers College Record,93(2),281-90.
11. Aristotle,Barnes, J.(Ed.)(1995).The Complete Works of Aristotle.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
12. Bayne, S.,Ross, J.(2014).The Pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: The UK View.York:The Higher Education Academy.
13. Curren, R.(Ed.)(2006).A Companion to the Philosophy of Education.Oxford:Blackwell publishing.
14. Dewey, J.(1980).The School and Society.Illinois:Southern Illinois University Press.
15. Dewey, J.(1953).Experience and Education.New York:The Macmillan Company.
16. Dewey, J.、林玉体譯(1996)。民主與教育。臺北:師大書苑。
17. Guignon, C.(Ed.),Hiley, D. R.(Ed.)(2003).Richard Rorty.New York:Cambridge University Press.
18. Head, K.(2014).Are MOOCs the Future of General Education?.The Journal of General Education,63(4),244-55.
19. Hutchins, R. M.(1952).Great Conversation: The Substance of a Liberal Education.London:Encyclopedia Britannica.
20. Katayama, K.(2003).Is the Virtue Approach to Moral Education Viable in a Plural Society.Journal of Philosophy of Education,37(2),325-38.
21. Lee, G. C.(1965).Education and Democratic Ideals.New York:Harcourt, Brace & World.
22. Lyotard, J. F.,Bennington, G.(Trans.),Massumi, B.(Trans.)(1984).The Postmodern Condition.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
23. Martin, W. P(1991).Indiana,the Temple University.
24. Noddings, N.(1995).A Morally Defensible Mission for Schools in the 21st Century.Phi Delta Kappan,76(5),365-68.
25. Noddings, N.(2006).Educational Leaders as Caring Teachers.School leadership & Management,26(4),339-45.
26. Noddings, N.(Ed.)(2005).The Challenge to Care In schools: An Alternative Approach to Education (2nd).New York:Teachers College Press.
27. Orrill, R.(1998).Education and Democracy Re-imagining Liberal Learning in America.New York:College Board.
28. Rorty, R.(1989).Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Cambridge University Press.
29. Schilpp, P. A.(Ed.)(1951).The Philosophy of John Dewey.New York:Tudor Publishing Company.
30. Wingert, J. R.,Wasileski, S. A.,Peterson, K.,Mathews, L. G.,Lanou, A. J.,Clarke, D.(2014).The Impact of Integrated Student Experiences on Learning.Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,14(1),42-58.
31. 沈清松(2002)。對比、外推與交談。臺北:五南。
32. 林玉体(1997)。通識教育就是優質教育。教育研究集刊，39，1-14。
33. 林玉体(1998)。教育概論。臺北:師大書苑。
34. 林玉体(1995)。西洋教育思想史。臺北:三民。
35. 林玉体編(1998)。跨世紀的教育演變。臺北:文景書局。
36. 林孝信、黃俊傑(1996)。美國的經典通識教育：經驗、問題與啟示。通識教育季刊，3(4)，117-32。
37. 徐宗林(1973)。赫欽斯教育思想之研究。臺北:文景書局。
38. 陳純瑩、李家宗、陳玉娟(2014)。哈佛大學課程改革對本國通識教育之啟示。教育政策論壇，17(1)，41-67。
39. 馮朝霖(2002)。外推、對話與連結—社區大學課程之定位與規劃。教育研究月刊，100，51-56。
40. 馮朝霖(1999)。新世紀的新課程淺見。教育資料與研究，26，43-45。
41. 黃炳煌編(1996)。教育改革理念、策略與措施。臺北:心理出版社。
42. 黃榮村(2010)。推動大學通識教育的舊困難與新課題。教育研究月刊，196，5-12。
43. 溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考即為通識教育。教育研究集刊，39，15-26。
44. 歐陽教編(1996)。教育概論。臺北:師大書苑。

1. 何佳瑞(2016)。教育中的終極關懷與馬里旦的博雅教育思想。哲學與文化，43(11)，77-94。
2. (2018)。評析H. D. Gideonse 對R. M. Hutchins 高等教育理念的批評。市北教育學刊，60，61-81。
3. (2021)。融入環境議題之教學實踐研究：以「不塑行動」為起點。高等教育，16(2)，113-154。