题名

高等教育成果導向教育之發展與反思

并列篇名

The Development and Reflection of Outcome-Based Education in Higher Education

DOI

10.6360/TJGE.201506_(15).0003

作者

洪煌堯(Huang-Yao Hong);吳惠萍(Hui-Ping Wu);邱婕欣(Chieh-Hsin Chiu);張芷瑄(Chih-Hsuan Chang);林奎宇(Kuei-Yu Lin);洪國財(Guo-Tsai Hung)

关键词

成果導向教育 ; 能力素養 ; 高等教育 ; 教育改革 ; 課程設計 ; outcome-based education ; competency ; higher education ; education reform ; curriculum design

期刊名称

通識教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

15期(2015 / 06 / 01)

页次

51 - 76

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

臺灣高等教育逐年趨向普及,然而在教育品質的提升上仍有待進一步努力,才能不斷提升整體高教的水準。參考各國高教之改革趨向,可以發現「成果導向教育」(outcome-based education, OBE)正漸漸受到教育改革的重視。國內大學也紛紛嘗試建立與規劃成果導向之教育模式,推動以成果為評量本位的課程與教學。不同於傳統教育偏重知識傳授與考試為主的教學評量,成果導向教育的特色在於重視培養可以帶得走並應用於社會的能力(competencies),強調教學應幫助學生內化這些能力並與實際生活產生連結,此為其突破傳統之處。然而,在國內外許多大學皆積極發展與規劃成果導向教育的同時,站在第一線的教育工作者也應以批判的角度來分析與反思成果導向教育的可行性、發展性與改進方向,才能真正對成果導向教育的本質與價值有更深的理解,並善加應用其優勢。因此,本文主要目的在於探究成果導向教育的理論依據,瞭解國內高教的課程規劃及實施情況,最後針對提出成果教育轉化傳統教育的意義及提出發展建議。探究結果建議成果導向教育應以協助學生實現自我為終極目標。最後從核心能力目標導向、全校教育目標統整、系所課程配套連貫、學習成果能力檢核四個面向,歸結出十二項具體改進與發展建議,以供各大學實行成果導向教育時,作為運作機制與調整方向之參考。

英文摘要

Higher education in Taiwan has increased its quantity of institutions in recent years. However, how to improve its quality in order to keep advancing higher education requires additional effort. In reference to the overall reform trends in higher education in different countries, it can be found that a great emphasis has been put on "outcome-based education" (OBE). Accordingly, many universities in Taiwan have also attempted to develop and/or implement different outcome-based education models in order to improve curriculum and instruction. Unlike traditional education which tends to focus on knowledge delivery using tests for evaluation, OBE has focused on developing critical competencies that are essential for citizens in the future society. It stresses that teaching should help students internalize these competencies and associate them with real life experiences. However, while many domestic and overseas universities are eager to develop and implement OBE, it is also necessary for educators to critically analyze and reflect on its feasibility and development under local context. This would help attain better understanding of the essence and value of OBE and to make better use of it. The purpose of this study is therefore to conceptually analyze the advantages and disadvantages of OBE. The purpose was accomplished by illustrating and reflecting on how its curricula are currently implemented, and by comparing it with traditional education models in order to further explore its value. In addition, we were able to propose possible means for continual improvements and development of it. The critical reflection on OBE in this paper concluded that the ultimate goal of higher education should focus on helping students achieve self-realization. In addition, we proposed a set of 12 practical suggestions for future reference. These suggestions also have implications for helping universities to better understand how to develop mechanisms for adapting and implementing OBE in the future.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 黃政傑(2007)。我國大學課程教學的改革方向與未來。課程與教學季刊,10(4),1-14。
    連結:
  2. 黃政傑、張嘉育(2010)。讓學生成功學習:適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學季刊,13(3),1-22。
    連結:
  3. Hamdi, M.. Outcome-Based Education. 2007.Web. 17 July 2009.〈http://celt.ust.hklobe/downloadNPAAO_OBEbriefing/070313_SENGI%20-%20ABET%20Criteria.pdf〉.
  4. 國立政治大學教務處:〈核心能力〉,《政大課程地圖網》,2010,2015.7.15,網址 〈http://cis.nccu.edu.tw/coursemap/students/Core.aspx〉。
  5. AACSB International Accreditation Coordinating Committee & Quality Committee. “AACSB Assurance of Earning Standards: An Interprelation.” AACSB lnternational. 2007. Web. 25 Aug. 2009.〈http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/Papers/AOLPaperfinal- 11-20-07.pdf〉.
  6. Alderson, A.,Martin, M.(2007).Outcomes Based Education: Where Has It Come From and Where Is It Going?.Issues in Educational Research,17(2),161-82.
  7. Biggs, J.,Tang, C.(2011).Teaching for Quality Learning at University.London:McGraw-Hill International.
  8. Bloom, B. S.(Ed.),Hastings, J. T.(Ed.),Madaus, G. F.(Ed.)(1971).Handbook On Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning.New York:McGraw.
  9. Botha, R. J.,Hite, S. J.(2000).Outcomes-Based Education and Quality: Cursory Remarks about a Possible Relationship.Educare,29(1),129-41.
  10. Brady, L.(1996).Outcome‐Based Education: A Critique.The Curriculum Journal,7(1),5-16.
  11. Brandt, R.(1993).On Outcome-Based Education: A Conversation with Bill Spady.Educational Leadership,50,66-70.
  12. Capper, C. A.,Jamison, M. T.(1993).Outcomes-Based Education Reexamined: From Structural Functionalism to Poststructuralism.Educational Policy,7(4),427-46.
  13. Collins, C.(Ed.)(1995).Curriculum Stocktake: Evaluating School Curriculum Change.Canberra:Australian College of Education.
  14. Davis, M. H.(2003).Outcome-Based Education.Journal of Veterinary Medical Education,30(3),258-63.
  15. Deneen, C.,Brown, G. T.,Bond, T. G.,Shroff, R.(2013).Understanding Outcome-Based Education Changes in Teacher Education: Evaluation of a New Instrument with Preliminary Findings.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,41(4),441-56.
  16. Espinoza, F. F.(2008).European influences in Chilean and Mexican Higher Education: The Bologna Process and the Tuning project.European Education,40(1),63-77.
  17. Fakier, M.,Waghid, Y.(2004).On Outcomes-Based Education and Creativity in South Africa.International Journal of Special Education,19(2),53-63.
  18. Furman, G. C.(1995).Administrators' Perceptions of Outcome-Based Education: a Case Study.International Journal of Educational Management,9(6),32-42.
  19. Gagne, R. M.(1974).Essentials of Learning for Instruction.Hinsdale:The Dryden Press.
  20. Giroux, H. A.(1988).Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning.Westport:Greenwood Publishing Group.
  21. Glaser, R.(1963).Instructional Technology and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions.American Psychologist,18(8),519-21.
  22. Gronlund, N. E.(1970).Stating Behavioral Objectives for Classroom Instruction.New York:Macmillan.
  23. Gruppen, L. D.(2012).Outcome-Based Medical Education: Implications, Opportunities, and Challenges.Korean Journal of Medical Education,24(4),281-85.
  24. Harden, R. M.(1999).AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-Based Education: Part 1-An Introduction to Outcome-Based Education.Medical Teacher,21(1),7-14.
  25. Harden, R. M.(2007).Outcome-Based Education: The Future is Today.Medical Teacher,29,625-29.
  26. Hargreaves, A.,Moore, S.(2000).Educational Outcomes, Modern and Postmodern Interpretations: Responses to Smyth and Dow.British Journal of Sociology Education,21(1),27-42.
  27. Ho, S. S.,Kember, D.,Lau, C. B.,Yeung, M. Y. A.,Leung, D. Y.,Chow, M. S.(2009).An Outcomes-Based Approach to Curriculum Development in Pharmacy.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,73(1),1-14.
  28. Johnson, M.(1967).Definitions and Models in Curriculum Theory.Educational Theory,17(2),127-40.
  29. Killen, R.(2013).Teaching Strategies for Outcomes-Based Education.New York:Open University Press.
  30. King, J. A.,Evans, K. M.(1991).Can We Achieve Outcome-Based Education.Educational Leadership,49,73-75.
  31. Lixun, W.(2011).Adaptation of Outcome-Based Learning in an Undergraduate English Education Programme.Research in Higher Education Journal,12,1-17.
  32. McNeir, G.(1993).Outcomes-Based Education: Tool for Restructuring.OSSC Bulletin,36(8),1-30.
  33. Morcke, A. M.,Dornan, T.,Eika, B.(2013).Outcome (competency) Based Education: An Exploration of Its Origins, Theoretical basis, and Empirical Evidence.Advances in Health Sciences Education,18(4),851-63.
  34. Showers, B.,Joyce, B.(1996).The Evolution of Peer Coaching.Educational Leadership,53,12-16.
  35. Spady, W. G.(1994).Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers.Arlington:American Association of School Administrators.
  36. Spady, W. G.(1977).Competency Based Education: A Bandwagon in Search of a Definition.Educational Researcher,6(1),9-14.
  37. Spady, W. G.(1981).Outcome-Based Instructional Management: A Sociological Perspective.Washington:National Institute of Education.
  38. Spady, W. G.(1998).Paradigm Lost: Reclaiming America's Educational Future.Arlington:American Association of School Administrators.
  39. Spady, W. G.(1988).Organizing for Results: The Basis of Authentic Restructuring and Reform.Educational Leadership,46(2),4-8.
  40. Spady, W. G.,Marshall, K. J.(1991).Beyond Traditional Outcome-based Education.Educational Leadership,49,67-72.
  41. Tyler, R. W.(2010).Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.Chicago:University of Chicago press.
  42. Van der Horst, H.,McDonald, R.(1997).OBE, Outcomes-Based Education: A Teacher's Manual.Pretoria:Kagiso Publishers.
  43. Whitehead, A. N.,Mentor(Ed.)(1970).Science and the Modern World.New York:New American Library.
  44. Yeung, J. W.,Ong, A. C.(2012).Framing and Consolidating the Assessment of Outcome-Based Learning (OBL) in Higher Institutes in Hong Kong: An Example Case Demonstration.Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială,37,34-48.
  45. 王如哲、陳欣華(2012)。成果導向之學生學習表現實例。臺灣教育,678,15-19。
  46. 王秀槐(2011)。學習成果導向的課程設計與評量:理念與實例。教育研究月刊,207,53-60。
  47. 王秀槐、王玉麟(2009)。歐盟動態循環課程規劃模式(tuning process)簡介。評鑑雙月刊,20,40-45。
  48. 王昕紅(2008)。美國工程與技術教育認證的新進展。高等學校理工科教學指導委員會通訊,6
  49. 王嘉陵(2003)。從Giroux 的批判教育學觀點反省課程改革中的教師角色。教育研究資訊,11(3),3-21。
  50. 李坤崇(2009)。成果導向的課程發展模式。教育研究月刊,186,39-58。
  51. 李坤崇(2011)。大學課程發展與學習成效評量。臺北:高等教育出版。
  52. 李秉乾(2008)。逢甲大學推動成果導向教學品保機制之經驗。評鑑雙月刊,16,31-34。
  53. 李秉乾、鄧鈞文(2011)。逢甲大學以學生學習成效為主體之教學品質保證機制。評鑑雙月刊,34,5-11。
  54. 徐聯恩、林明吟(2005)。成果導向教育(OBE)的教育改革及其在美國實踐的經驗。教育政策論壇,8(2),55-74。
  55. 劉曼君(2013)。IEET 公告2014 年認證規範稿歡迎各界提供建議。評鑑雙月刊,41,56-67。
  56. 劉曼君(2007)。成果導向認證檢視畢業生核心能力。評鑑雙月刊,6,30-31。
  57. 樊愛群、郭建志、饒析、許政行(2009)。談中原大學以學生基本能力培育落實大學教育之發展。教育研究月刊,186,59-74。
  58. 鄧鈞文(2012)。成果導向教育革新及逢甲大學實踐經驗。教育研究,218,25-35。
  59. 蘇錦麗(2009)。美國WASC 採行的「學生學習成果本位評估模式」。評鑑雙月刊,22,37-41。
  60. 蘇錦麗、楊正誠(2011)。美國WASC 採行之「成果本位」學程評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,30,35-39。
被引用次数
  1. 賴淑芳(2019)。成果導向學習之教學設計與學習成效探討。德明學報,42,45-61。
  2. 魯盈讌,黃芷翎,舒仲瑜,張榮叁,李建宏(2023)。因應嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎(COVID-19)採用遠距教學型態的通識課程成效:以高雄醫學大學為例。通識學刊:理念與實務,11(2),63-101。
  3. 羅恩冕、郭昭佑(2018)。我國大學學生評鑑教師教學指標之研究:概念構圖法的調整應用。教育研究與發展期刊,14(1),1-33。