College Students' Learning Outcomes in an E-Art Education

大學生在線上通識藝術教育中的學習成效

10.6360/TJGE.201712_(20).0003

Lee, Ching-Yieh；Chien, Chih-Feng；Walters, Brent G.；Liao, Ching-Jung；Chen, Li-Yu

college education ； general art education ； cross-disciplinary education ； online learning ； art programs ； 大學教育 ； 通識藝術教育 ； 跨領域教育 ； 線上學習 ； 藝術課程

通識教育學刊

20期（2017 / 12 / 01）

61 - 97

英文

The art courses in college general education programs are usually separated from other disciplines and only beneficial to small groups of enrolled students. In the study, an open online general art education (e-art) program in an informal, cross-disciplinary learning environment (Baker & O’Neil, 2006) is constructed for providing a complement to general education. Applying Schiller’s (2004) aesthetic notion of freedom, the purpose of this study is threefold: (a) to offer a new paradigm of general education beyond formal curriculum framework, (b) to assess the pedagogical effects e-art brought to general art education, and (c) to quantitatively investigate user outcomes to this e-art education experience. By collecting 737 college students for a comprehensive survey, the study has four major findings. First, there are more significant differences among behavioral variables than demographic variables, implying that the program implementation plays a critical role to influence its pedagogical effects. Second, the campus art collection in the program was more attractive to the college students than famous masterpieces. Third, art activities in this particular e-art education enhance student’s self-reported creativity and imagination. Finally, in the early stage of general art education, it is more important to immerse students in artistic appreciation than rush their own artistic creation process.

在大學通識教育中的藝術相關課程，通常與其他領域缺乏關聯性，並且課程數量有限，只讓少數的修課同學獲益。本研究中，在一個非正式的跨領域學習環境（Baker & O'Neil, 2006）裡，建構了對全校學生開放的線上藝術（e-art）學習專區，做為傳統通識課程架構的另類補充。以席勒（Schiller, 2004）有關自由之美學概念出發，本研究有三個目的：（1）為通識教育提供一個課程架構的新典範，（2）評估此線上藝術學習方案對於通識性藝術教育所帶來的學習成效，（3）從量化研究來檢視此線上藝術學習經驗的效果。經由針對737位學生的問卷調查分析，本研究帶來四個主要的發現。首先，可操控的行為變項較比基本的背景變項存在更多的顯著差異，意味學習方案的執行方式對於學習成效扮演著關鍵性的角色；其次，本學習方案中的校園藝術典藏對現今的大學生而言較方案裡的世界名畫更有吸引力；第三，本學習方案中的藝術活動強化了學生自覺之創造力和想像力；最後，在通識性藝術教育的啟萌階段，讓學生有更多沉浸於藝術欣賞的機會，比急促地推動他們從事創作更加的重要。

1. Chumack, J.. “Astronomy Picture of the Day: The Horsehead Nebula.” Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive. 2013. Web. 01 December 2017. 〈http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap131231.html〉.
2. Heller, E. J.. “Eric J Heller Gallery-Art and Science.” Eric J Heller Gallery. 2017. Web. 01 December 2017.〈http://jalbum.net/zh_CN/browse/user/album/1696720〉.
3. Andreo, R. B.. “Astronomy Picture of the Day: Galaxy Cove Vista Revisited.” Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive. 2014. Web. 01 December 2017. 〈http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140629.html〉.
4. Alessi, S. M.,Trollip, S. R.(2001).Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
5. Anderson, T.(Ed.)(2008).The Theory and Practice of Online Learning.Athabasca:Athabasca University Press.
6. Arnstine, D.(1990).Art, Aesthetics, and the Pitfalls of Discipline ‐ based Art Education.Educational Theory,40(4),415-22.
7. Beiser, F. C.(2005).Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Benander, R.,Lightner, R.(2005).Promoting Transfer of Learning: Connecting General Education Courses.The Journal of General Education,54(3),199-208.
9. Bourdieu, P.(Ed.),Whiteside, S.(Ed.)(1990).Photography: A Middle-Brow Art.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
10. Cakmak, E.,Yilmaz, S. M.(2014).E-Learning from the Perspective of Right to Education.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,116,426-30.
11. Chen, R-S.,Tsai, C-C.(2007).Gender Differences in Taiwan University Students' Attitudes Toward Web-Based Learning.Cyberpsychology & Behavior,10(5),645-54.
12. Cheung, W.,Huang, W.(2005).Proposing a Framework to Assess Internet Usage in University Education: An Empirical Investigation from a Student's Perspective.British Journal of Educational Technology,36(2),237-53.
13. Chien, C. F.,Rad, Z. M.(2012).An Action Research: Application of a Three-Way Multimedia Blended Learning in a Second Language Acquisition and Development Course.International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design,2(4),1-19.
14. Chien, C. F.,Rad, Z. M.(2013).Blending a Three-way Technology into a Language Acquisition and Development Course for Pre-service Teachers.Journal of Curriculum and Teaching,2(2),112-26.
15. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention.New York:Harper Perennial.
16. De Corte, E.(2003).Transfer as the Productive Use of Acquired Knowledge, Skills, and Motivations.Current Directions in Psychological Science,12(4),142-46.
17. Du Marsais, C.,Goodman, D.(Tran.)(2010).Philosopher: The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation project.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Library.
18. Fiske, E. B.(1999).Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning.Washington:Arts Education Partnership.
19. Fraser, A. B.(1999).Colleges Should Tap the Pedagogical Potential of the World-Wide Web.Chronicle of Higher Education,48,B8.
20. Gans, H.(2008).Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste Revised and Updated.New York:Basic Books.
21. Hou, H.-T.,Chang, K.-E.,Sung, Y.-T.(2009).Using Blogs as a Professional Development Tool for Teachers: Analysis of Interaction Behavioral Patterns.Interactive Learning Environments,17(4),325-40.
22. Ibrahim, Z.,Asarani, N. A. M.(2012).Exploring the Potential of E-learning for the Teaching of Line Drawing Subject.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,67,600-05.
23. Ibrahim, Z.,Aziz, A. A.(2012).Instructional Design Theory on Teaching Delivery and Evaluation Online for Graphic Design Courses.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,67,606-10.
24. Jensen, E.(1998).Teaching with the Brain in Mind.Alexandria:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Lee, C.-Y.,Pan, P. J. D.,Liao, C.-J.,Chen, H.-Y.,Walters, B. G.(2013).E-Character Education Among Digital Natives: Focusing on Character Exemplars.Computers & Education,67,58-68.
26. Lee, C-Y.,Pan, P. J. D.,Liao, C-J.(2011).Impacts and Preferences Study for E-HO as a Holistic Learning Environment Complementary to E-Learning.Computers & Education,56,747-59.
27. Mason, R.(2008).Problems of Interdisciplinarity: Evidence-Based and/or Artist-Led Research.International Journal of Art & Design Education,27(3),279-92.
28. Olaniran, B. A.(2009).Culture, Learning Styles, and Web 2.0.Interactive Learning Environments,17(4),261-71.
29. O'Neil, H.F.(Ed.),Perez, R.S.(Ed.)(2006).Web-Based Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice.Mahwah:Erlbaum.
30. Ong, C. S.,Lai, J. Y.,Wang, Y. S.(2004).Factors Affecting Engineers' Acceptance of Asynchronous E-Learning Systems in High-Tech Companies.Information & Management,41(6),795-804.
31. Pan, P. J.,Pan, G. H. M.,Lee, C. Y.,Chang, S. S. H.(2010).University Students' Perceptions of a Holistic Care Course Through Cooperative Learning: Implications for Instructorsand Researchers.Asia Pacific Education Review,11(2),199-209.
32. Papastergiou, M.,Solomonidou, C.(2005).Gender Issues in Internet Access and Favourite Internet Activities Among Greek High School Pupils Inside and Outside School.Computers & Education,44,377-93.
33. Peacock, A.(Ed.),Rizzo, I.(Ed.)(1994).Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies.The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Prater, M.(2001).Constructivism and Technology in Art Education.Art Education,54(6),43-48.
35. Prensky, M.(2001).Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.On the horizon,9(5),1-6.
36. Prieto-Rodríguez, J.,Fernández-Blanco, V.(2000).Are Popular and Classical Music Listeners the Same People?.Journal of Cultural Economics,24(2),147-64.
37. Quinn, R. D.(2011).E-Learning in Art Education: Collaborative Meaning Making Through Digital Art Production.Art Education,64(4),19-24.
38. Roland, C.(2010).Preparing Art Teachers to Teach in a New Digital Landscape.Art Education,63(1),17-24.
39. Savva A.,Trimis E.,Zachariou A.(2004).Exploring the Links Between Visual Arts and Environmental Education: Experiences of Teachers Participating in an In-Service Training Programme.International Journal of Art & Design Education,23(3),246-55.
40. Schiller, F.,Snell, R.(Tran.)(2004).On the Aesthetic Education of Man.Mineola:Dover Publications, INC.
41. Scott, P.(2002).The Future of General Education in Mass Higher Education Systems.Higher Education Policy,15,61-75.
42. Ştefan-Sebastian, M.(2014).Schiller's Aesthetic Freedom and the Challenges of Aesthetic Education.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,163,169-78.
43. Tsai, C-C.(2008).The Preferences Toward Constructivist Internet-based Learning Environments Among University Students in Taiwan.Computers in Human Behavior,24,16-31.
44. Wang, H. Y.,Wang, Y. S.(2008).Gender Differences in the Perception and Acceptance of Online Games.British Journal of Educational Technology,39(5),787-806.
45. Williams, P. J.(2007).Valid Knowledge: The Economy and the Academy.Higher Education,54,511-23.
46. Zhang, D.(2009).The Application of Blog in English Writing.Journal of Cambridge Studies,4(1),64-72.

1. 林季怡、李育諭(2018)。大學跨領域能力、課程參與和問題覺知關係之研究。科學教育學刊，26(S)，419-440。
2. 魯盈讌,黃芷翎,舒仲瑜,張榮叁,李建宏(2023)。因應嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎（COVID-19）採用遠距教學型態的通識課程成效：以高雄醫學大學為例。通識學刊：理念與實務，11(2)，63-101。