共敘大港聚落之環境正義：敘事力融入通識課程之人文陶養與學習成效探究

Co-narrating the Environmental Justice of A Major Port Village: Narrative-Based Fieldtrips and The Associated Learning Outcomes Assessment

10.6360/TJGE.202206_(29).0003

黃淑玲(Huang, Sheila Shu-Ling)；黃詠愷(Huang, Yung-Kai)；陳怡婷(Chen, Yi-Ting)

環境正義 ； 敘事 ； 踏查 ； 評量尺規 ； 整合性研究 ； environmental justice ； narrative ； fieldtrip ； rubrics ； mixed-methods

通識教育學刊

29期（2022 / 06 / 01）

97 - 139

繁體中文

本文旨在探討議題導向敘事力融入場域踏查，如何影響人文之陶養以促進人才培育之目的。文中案例通識課程於109學年度課程實施（n=76），藉由場域踏查三階段課程設計，並以質、量化整合性研究進行學生學習成效評估，以理解個人學習與團隊合作在知識建構、三師跨域共授議題融入時間軸、場域踏查共敘環境正義與健康、推論階梯後設思考踏查歷程等各項教學歷程的成果。學生的多元敘事能力展現於繪圖、心得寫作反思與期末小組報告；而統計總結性評量工具「期末小組口頭報告評量尺規」的各個評估項目後發現（n=51），全班在「口語溝通」的個人分數上顯著低於「簡報製作」相關的團體分數；但各項評分向度都沒有顯著的性別差異。質性分析心得寫作後發現，學習者藉由課堂互動經歷了傾聽、協調、溝通與表達，並發揮於場域踏查時對於議題的同理與共感，進而後設反思「人文陶養」作為學習目標已融入每個教學環節中。全文末反思議題導向之敘事力融入場域踏查後，如何縱深學習者之助人健康的信念與倡議，進而展望未來教學樣貌以持續人才培育之努力。

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how issue-oriented and narrative-based fieldtrips cultivate humanities as a way of fostering students. The general education course in this study had a focus on the issue of environmental justice and three staged fieldtrips were carried out in this course. Seventy-six students in total were enrolled in the academic year of 2020, and learning outcomes were assessed through a mixed-methods approach to evaluate how well they engaged themselves individually and collectively in the entire process. Narrative works collected for measuring student learning included drawing, reflective writing, and final presentations by groups (n=51). Grading rubrics, the tool for assessing wholistic learning outcomes, showed that scores in collaborative performances were higher than individual ones. Qualitative analyses found that competencies such as listening, negotiation, communication and expression were clearly experienced through in-class interactions, which became highly instrumental in developing empathy and compassion in fieldtrips. In addition, practice reflection and suggestions were also provided for teaching advancement in the future and fostering next generation professionals.

1. 曾肇文(2008)。一種敘事課程的建構與實施--以「生活領域」為例。新竹教育大學學報，25(1)，21-52。
   連結：
2. Apigo, M. J.(2020).Moving from Compliance to A Culture of Inquiry: Student Learning Outcome Implementation and Professional Development in California Community Colleges.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois.
3. Argyris, C.(1990).Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning.Neeham:Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bagnoli, A.(2009).Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and artsbased methods.Qualitative Research,9(5),547-570.
5. Barr, R.,Tagg, J.(2005).From Teaching to Learning; A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.Change: The Magazine of Higher Education,27(6),12-25.
6. Bragg, A. K.(1976).,Washington, DC:ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, American Association for Higher Education.
7. Dewey, J. Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books, 1963. Web. 9 Aug. 2021. 〈http://www.schoolofeducators.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/EXPERIENCE-EDUCATION-JOHN-DEWEY.pdf〉.
8. Fischer, K.(2020).The Student Experience.The Post-Pandemic College And The Future,Washington, D.C.:
9. Glance, L.G.,Thirukumaran, C.P.,Dick, A.W.(2021).The Unequal Burden of COVID19 Deaths in Counties with High Proportions of Black and Hispanic Residents.Medical Care,59(6),470-476.
10. Gramling, L.F.,Carr, R. L.(2004).Lifelines: A life history methodology.Nursing Research,53,207-210.
11. Hodson, D.(2003).Time for action: science education for an alternative future.International Journal of Science Education,25(6),645-670.
12. Huang, Y. K.,Huang, Y. L.,Hsueh, Y. M.,Wang, J. T.,Yang, M. H.,Chen, C. J.(2009).Changes in urinary arsenic methylation profiles in a 15-year interval after cessation of arsenic ingestion in southwest Taiwan.Environmental Health Perspectives,117(12),1860-1866.
13. Mandal, B. K.,Suzuki, K.T.(2002).Arsenic Round The World: A Review.Talanta,58,201-235.
14. Melrose, S., Park, C. & Perry, B. Creative Clinical Teaching in The Health Professions.used under a CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 international license, 2015. Web. 13 June 2022.〈 https://pressbooks.com/app/uploads/sites/116910/2019/05/Creative-ClinicalTeaching-in-the-Health-Professions-1557547389.pdf〉.
15. Milojević, I.(2021).COVID-19 and Pandemic Preparedness: Foresight Narratives and Public Sector Responses.The Journal of Futures Studies,26(1),1-18.
16. Monrouxe, L.(2010).Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care?.Medical Education,44,40-49.
17. Ross, R. “The Ladder of Inference.” The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. Eds. P. Senge, Peter M., Kleiner, C. A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B. and Smith, B. J. New York: Doubleday, 1994, 242-246. Web. 31 July 2021〈https://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/The%20Ladder%20of%20Inference.pdf〉.
18. Samuel, L. J.,Gaskin, D. J.,Trujillo, A. J.,Szanton, S. L.,Samuel, A.,Slade, E.(2021).Race, Ethnicity, Poverty and The Social Determinants of The Coronavirus Divide: U.S. County-Level Disparities and Risk Factors.BMC Public Health,21(1250)
19. Sarbin, T. R.(ed.)(1986).The Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct.Praeger.
20. Schlosberg, D.(2013).Theorizing Environmental Justice: The Expanding Sphere of a Discourse.Environmental politics,22(1),37-55.
21. Schlosberg, D.(2004).Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories.Environmental politics,13(3),517-540.
22. Senge, P.,Kleiner, C. A.,Roberts, C.,Ross, R. B.,Smith, B.J.(1994).The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building A Learning Organization.New York:Doubleday.
23. United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. “Toxic Wastes and Race in The United States.” 1987. Web. 27 July 2021. 〈 https://www.ucc.org/wpntent/uploads/2020/12/ToxicWastesRace.pdf〉.
24. Vidaeff, A. C.,Kerrigan, A. J.,Monga, M.(2015).Cross-Cultural Barriers to Health Care.Southern Medical Journal,108(1),1-4.
25. Weidman, J. C.,Twale, D. J.,Stein, E. L.(2001).Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A perilous Passage?.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report,28(3)
26. Weissman, S.(2017).When and How Do We Teach Cultural Awareness?.Academic Medicine,92(12),1653.
27. William-Webster. “Justice.” Web. 31 July 2021.〈https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/justice〉.
28. 行政院環境保護署(2013).環境正義給我的 10 堂課.台北:行政院環境保護署.
29. 林竹芸：〈成為台大人那一年：我很徬徨，不知人生下一步該怎麼走？〉，《親子天下》，2020，網址〈https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102434?eturec=1&ercamp=article_hot_13〉。
30. 林愛玲(2019)。河口學堂：一位國小校長校本課程領導之敘事探究。課程研究，14(2)，67-83。
31. 國家衛生研究院國家環境毒物研究中心(2013)。國家衛生研究院國家環境毒物研究中心：《細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)對人體健康危害之預防策略研究公聽會會議實錄》，台北：國家衛生研究院，2013。
32. 郭志榮、張光宗：〈大林蒲的遷村夢真能結束空污下的生活？〉，《環境資訊中心》，2021，網址〈https://e-info.org.tw/node/231646〉。
33. 陳佩英,李哲迪,ASK 愛思客團隊(2020)。表現任務與素養評量。「概念與探究為本課程設計」教師研習工坊，台北:
34. 黃俊儒(2010)。為什麼行動？解決什麼問題？—以行動或問題為導向的通識課程理念與實踐。通識教育學刊，6，9-28。
35. 劉亦：〈同島一命：冷戰馬祖記憶，與疫情下的《文化逆輸入》〉，《鳴人堂》，2021.5.25，時事觀察、新冠肺炎版，網址〈https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/10124/5475658〉。
36. 劉苑杉：〈反覆封城的馬來西亞，能給《微解封》的台灣什麼啟示〉，《鳴人堂》，2021.7.19，獨立評論在天下版，網址〈https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/6785/5606306〉。
37. 環境資訊中心：〈2018 年重大環境新聞回顧：變革與轉型爭議的一年〉，《台灣環境保護聯盟》，2018，網址〈https://e-info.org.tw/node/215723〉。

1. 詹明峰,陳若盈(2023)。素養導向的大學英文課：以議題融入概念為本的設計。通識教育學刊，31，163-217。
2. (2023)。環境不正義之協商日常：探討議題融入田野踏查課程模組之學習成效。教育研究與發展期刊，19(4)，83-121。