素養導向的大學英文課：以議題融入概念為本的設計

Transforming College Reading Class Toward Competency Development: Findings From an Issue Integration Course Designed With an UbD Framework

10.6360/TJGE.202306_(31).0005

陳若盈(Chen, Jou-Yin)；詹明峰(Jan, Mingfong)

可視化思考 ； 素養導向 ； 概念為本 ； 議題融入 ； visible thinking ； competency-oriented ； big ideas ； issue integration

通識教育學刊

31期（2023 / 06 / 01）

163 - 217

繁體中文;英文

議題融入課程的教學，在培養21世紀關鍵能力的國際潮流下成為熱門議題，也是108課綱培養核心素養的解方之一。本研究以大學通識英文選修課為教學與研究的場域，以議題融入概念為本，將課程翻新，運用可視化思考為主要教學方法。本研究採用質性研究取向的行動研究，來了解學生修習上述課程後議題分析能力的改變，以及課程對修課學生的學習觀點產生的影響，並歸納課程與教學的設計重點。本研究探討兩個研究問題：一、議題融入、概念為本融入課程設計後，學生的議題分析表現產生哪些改變？二、議題融入、概念為本融入課程設計對學生的學習產生哪些影響？研究結果發現，本課程明顯提升學生的議題分析表現，尤其是多元觀點及系統思考兩種關鍵思考能力。同時，學生對後設思考與協同學習的想法也有明顯的變化。本研究亦發現，議題融入、概念為本的課程設計尤須注意選擇讓學生有感的議題和文本、因應學習狀況調整學習任務及思考慣例的安排、促進小組有效的對話和思考。本研究未設計以小組協同合作促進議題探究與分析表現，此為研究者下一階段的研究目標。本研究提供議題融入、概念為本的課程設計應用於通識教育之實際案例，以及教學設計的新觀點，對於運用議題融入提升素養的課程、教學及學習評量皆有啟發與貢獻。

The importance of core competencies and the trend of integrating global issues in curriculum has gained increasing attention in recent years. In fact, the topic of issues integration into curriculum has also been adopted in several higher education teaching practice research in Taiwan and have been proven to bring positive effects toward cultivation of competencies, interdisciplinary inquiry, and social awareness. However, the researchers found that the alignments among big ideas, issues, cultivation of thinking abilities, and assessment have not been stressed enough in previous research. Thus, there is an urgent need to review relevant literature and propose a curriculum to solve the above issues. In the present research, we aim to propose an issues integration and competency-based curriculum design framework and inquire two research questions: 1) How does students' performance on issues analysis change during issue integration curriculum enactment? 2) How does students' perception of learning change during issue integration curriculum enactment? We applied action research method for research design and qualitative research paradigm for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. The analysis results revealed that issues integration and UbD course design have brought positive impact on students' performance of issues analysis writing, especially their performance of considering multiple viewpoints and systems thinking. Meanwhile, students perceived improvement of reading comprehension and positive influence from group collaboration and metacognitive thinking. The positive result proved that the present curriculum design could serve as an applicable and practical framework. The limitation of the research is the lack of more comprehensive explanation between how group collaboration affects students' performance of issues inquiry. The suggestion for future study is to consolidate literature and collect data of group discussion to bridge the gap. Insights gained from the present research may provide reference for future researchers and educators who are interested in this topic.

1. 李明昆(2017)。全球氣候變遷議題融入技職大學生通識課程教學之研究。通識學刊：理念與實務，5(1)，1-36。
   連結：
2. 陳淑敏,林智凱(2022)。大學生敘事力的學習表現與反思之研究：以移工議題的實作為途徑。通識教育學刊，29，11-39。
   連結：
3. 黃俊儒(2017)。以通識教育型塑公民社會：科學新聞識讀課程為例。課程與教學，20(1)，45-72。
   連結：
4. 黃淑玲,黃詠愷,陳怡婷(2022)。共敘大港聚落之環境正義：敘事力融入通識課程之人文陶養與學習成效探究。通識教育學刊，29，97-139。
   連結：
5. Creswell, J. W.,Poth, C. N.(2013).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Sage.
6. Hemberger, L.,Kuhn, D.,Matos, F.,Shi, Y.(2017).A dialogic path to evidence-based argumentative writing.Journal of the Learning Sciences,26(4),575-607.
7. Kuhn, D.(2022).Let’s discuss: Second-language learners share ideas, Teacher’s edition.Wessex Press.
8. Kuhn, D.(2005).Education for thinking.Harvard University Press.
9. Kuhn, D.,Crowell, A.(2011).Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking.Psychological Science,22,545-552.
10. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(2019).PISA 2018 reading framework.
11. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019b). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
12. Ritchhart, R.(2015).Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our schools.Jossey-Bass.
13. Ritchhart, R.,Church, M.(2020).The power of making thinking visible: Practices to engage and empower all learners.Jossey-Bass.
14. Ritchhart, R.,Church, M.,Morrison, K.(2011).Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners.Jossey-Bass.
15. Shaffer, D. W.,Resnick, M.(1999)."Thick" authenticity: New media and authentic learning.Journal of Interactive Learning Research,10(2),195-216.
16. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press.
17. Walsh, J. A.,Sattes, B. D.(2005).Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner.Corwin Press.
18. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(2005).Understanding by design.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. 國家教育研究院(2020).議題融入說明手冊.
20. 教育部國民及學前教育署（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=12504
21. 曾瓊瑤(2021)。閱讀書寫課程融入在地偏鄉教育議題之實踐歷程、學習成效與反思。教學實踐與創新，4(2)，1-38。
22. 鈕文英(2021).質性研究方法與論文寫作.雙葉書廊.
23. 藍偉瑩(2021).提問力——啟動探究思考的關鍵.親子天下.
24. 藍偉瑩(2019).教學力——深化素養學習的關鍵.親子天下.