《傳奇彙考》及其相關戲曲考釋書目──從《傳奇彙考》到《曲海總目提要》及《曲海總目提要補編》

Chuanqi Huikao and the Related Drama Title Index──From Chuanqi Huikao to Quhai Zongmu Tiyao and Quhai Zongmu Tiyao Bubian

10.6257/2009.3125

江巨榮(Ju-Rong Jiang)；浦部依子(Yoriko Urabe)

傳奇匯考 ； 曲海總目提要 ； 提要補編 ； 石川本 ； 碩園本 ； 古今書室本 ； Chuanqi Huikao ； Quhai Zongmu Tiyao ； Quhai Zongmu Tiyao Bubian ； Ishikawa transcript ； Sekien transcript ； Gujin Shushi edition

戲劇研究

3期（2009 / 01 / 01）

125 - 145

繁體中文

《傳奇匯考》在元明清劇目的整理和劇目內容的考釋上有重要的地位。它在國內外流傳的抄本較多。但因彼此分散，歷來研究不多。這裡以古今書室本爲依據，參考了京都大學藏石川誼臣抄本和大阪大學藏碩園精抄本，在所見抄本範圍內，比較各本所錄劇目，探討該書原有存目。在此基礎上，就《曲海總目提要》的劇目組成、來源作出分析，並以董康、王國維所校訂諸卷為例，考述了《匯考》與《提要》間的文字異同，論述了《提要》對《匯考》考釋文字所作刪簡、補充和修訂的大致類型，從中見出二者的區別。此外，本文還就《曲海總目提要補編》所補曲目及其考釋文字，與所見石川本、碩園本的關係作了比較，指明《補編》所補劇目與考釋，基本已包括在所見兩種日本藏本中。於此也可見石川本、碩園本對了解《匯考》《提要》直至《補編》的重要。本文祈望日後能見到海內外各種《匯考》抄本的匯集，這對了解中國古典戲曲的考釋系列將大有助益。所涉書目，行文一般簡作《匯考》《提要》《補編》，文中標題則保留全名。

Chuanqi Huikao is significant for bibliography and textual research of the Yuan, Ming and Qing dramas. There are numerous transcripts and editions of Chuanqi Huikao but they are so scattered throughout China and overseas that they have never been studied systematically. On the basis of the Gujin Shushi edition, this paper compares the Ishikawa Yoshiomi transcript from the Kyoto University library and the Sekien transcript from the Osaka University library, as well as all available sources, to sort out the original drama title index and the transmission of Chuanqi Huikao. Following Wang Guowei and Dong Kang’s revisions, we examined discrepancies between the contents of Chuanqi Huikao and Quhai Zongmu Tiyao from which we analyze the types of omissions, supplements, and revisions that Quhai Zongmu Tiyao made to the Chuanqi Huikao. In addition, when we compared the Ishikawa Yoshiomi and Sekien transcripts with the supplementary drama titles and their textual studies as seen in Quhai Zongmu Tiyao Bubian, we found the contents of Quhai Zongmu Tiyao Bubian were basically included in these two editions in Japan. Thus we can see the value of these two editions in Japan. We hope to do a further examination of more editions of Chuanqi Huikao in order to contribute to textual research on traditional Chinese drama.

1. 北嬰：〈曲海總目提要拾遺〉，《劇學月刊》5卷3/4合輯專刊（1936年1月）。
2. (1959)。中國古典戲曲論著集成。北京:中國戲劇出版社。
3. 王國維(1983)。王國維遺書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
4. 北嬰(1959)。曲海總目提要補編。北京:人民文學出版社。
5. 佚名(1994)。傳奇彙考。北京:書目文獻出版社。
6. 黃仕忠編、金文京編、喬秀岩編(2006)。日本所藏稀見中國戲曲文獻叢刊。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
7. 董康(1958)。曲海總目提要。北京:人民文學出版社。
8. 董康、傅杰點校(1998)。書舶庸譚。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。
9. 蔣寅(1999)。東瀛讀書記。文獻，1999(1)，29-44。
10. 鄧長風(1999)。明清戲曲家考略三編。上海:上海古籍出版社。

1. (2024).Do the Parts Add Up? Textual Systems and Segments of Sijie Ji (The Four Seasons) in Ming Anthologies.民俗曲藝,225,17-57.