臺灣各縣市數位接取指數之研究

The Research of Digital Access Indexes of Each District Governments in Taiwan

10.29895/ATFSAS.201203.0005

黃偉倫(Wei-Lung Huang)

數位接取指數 ； 城鄉數位落差 ； 縣市比較 ； Digital Access Index ； Urban-Rural Digital Divide ； Cross-County Comparisons

新竹教育大學人文社會學報

5卷1期（2012 / 03 / 01）

111 - 136

繁體中文

本文利用International Telecommunication Union（ITU, 2003）的數位接取指數及臺灣各縣市資料計算臺灣整體與各縣市的2007年數位接取指數，其結果發現臺灣的數位接取問題已由基礎建設之問題轉為特定區域（城鄉數位落差）或特定族群（族群數位落差）等之網路使用率問題。且臺灣各縣市存在城鄉數位落差的現象，城鄉數位落差程度較高的因素為網路使用率與服務品質，如北部地區各縣市的2007年數位接取指數較東部地區與南部地區為高。本文建議臺灣應提出城鄉數位落差縮減政策，且資訊使用能力落差縮減政策應是現階段城鄉數位落差縮減政策的重要課題。

This paper use the idea and variables of Digital Access Index (DAI) which is from ITU(2003) and a cross-county data of Taiwan to investigate 2007 DAI of overall and each district governments in Taiwan. From the results, the digital access problem of Taiwan should occur on the internet users of the specific district (Urban-Rural Digital Divide) or specific group (Ethnic Digital Divide). And there is the phenomenon of Urban-Rural Digital Divide among each district governments in Taiwan, and its reasons should be the internet users and service quality, as DAI of each district governments in north region are higher than they in east and south region. The suggestions of this paper are Taiwan should run the reduction policy of Urban-Rural Digital Divide, and the point of this paper should be the reduction policy of Digital Divide on Information Ability.

1. PPIC. (2009). PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Information Technology. Retrieved from:http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/s_608mbs.pdf
2. USDA. (2009d). Community Connect Broadband Program Grant Application Guide Fiscal Year 2009. Retrieved from: http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/commconnect/2009/2009CommConnectAppGuideb.pdf
3. 梁德馨（2008）。九十七年度臺灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查報告。臺北：財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心。
4. USDA. (2008a). USDA Awards $28 Million for Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants. Retrieved from: http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=USDA+%282008a%29.+USDA+Awards+%2428+Million+for+Distance+Learning+and+Telemedicine+Grants.&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rurdev.usda.gov%2Fsd%2Fpress08%2Fsept18%2520DLT%2520news%2520release%252009%2520%252008%2520(2).doc&ei=z6pdT56pBenZmAXO3YDHDw&usg=AFQjCNErpqR4ZaTIh5ZGFREzg5VwCsT0mQ
5. USDA. (2008b). USDA Rural Development Awards Almost $5 Million for Public TV Digital Television Grants. Retrieved from: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/supportdocuments/8-18-2008_tv_digital_grants.pdf
6. CPUC. (2009). CPUC Continues to Help Bridge Digital Divide with Approval of Broadband Projects in Unserved and Underserved Counties. Retrieved from: http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/NEWS_RELEASE/98462.htm
7. USDA. (2009c).Rural Public Television Digital Transition Grant Program Application Guide Fiscal Year 2009. Retrieved from: https://www.pdffiller.com/edit.php?id=1468318
8. USDA. (2009b). Distance Learning & Telemedicine Program Grant Application Guide Fiscal Year 2009. Retrieved from: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/55748319/Distance-Learning-Telemedicine-Program
9. Atici, B.(2010).Information society statistics and indicators: The case of Turkey.African Journal of Business Management,4(7),1363-1371.
10. Bar, F.,Riis, A. M.(1998).From Welfare to Innovation: Toward a New Rationale for Universal Service.26th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference,Arlington, VA:
11. Bikson, T. K.,Panis, C. W. A.(1999).Citizens, Computers, and Connectivity: a Review of Trends.Santa Monica, CA:RAND.
12. Bonilha, C.(2003).DAI- Digital Access Index, Brazil Breadown.São Paulo:Brampton Telecom.
13. Bonilha, C.(2007).DAI- Digital Access Index, Brazil: 2006 Update.São Paulo:Brampton Telecom.
14. Ebo, B.(ed.)(1998).The Cyberghetto or Cybertopia: Race, Class, Gender & Marginalization in Cyberspace.NY:Praeger.
15. Graham, S.,Cornford, J.,Marvin, S.(1996).The Socio-Economic Benefits of a Universal Telephone Network.Telecommunications Policy,20(1),3-10.
16. Hardy, A. P.(1980).The Role of the Telephone in Economic Development.Telecommunications Policy,4(4),278-286.
17. Horrigan, J. B.(2008).Home Broadband Adoption 2008.Washington, DC:Pew Internet & American Life Project.
18. ITU(2003).World Summit on the Information SocietyWorld Summit on the Information Society,未出版
19. ITU(2008).,未出版
20. Jipp, A.(1963).Wealth of Nations and Telephone Density.ITU Telecommunication Journal,30(6),199-201.
21. Khosrow-Pour, M.(ed.)(2005).Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.Hershey, PA:Idea Group.
22. Lievrouw, L.(ed.),Livingstone, S.(ed.)(2002).Handbook of New Media.London, UK:Sage.
23. OECD(2001).,Paris:.
24. Parker, E. B.(2000).Closing the Digital Divide in Rural America.Telecommunications Policy,24(4),281-290.
25. Samuel, J.,Shah, N.,Hadingham, W.(2005).Mobile Communications in South Africa, Tanzania and Egypt: Results from Community and Business Surveys, The Impact of Mobile Phones.Vodaphone Policy Paper Series,2,44-52.
26. Schement, J. R.(1995).Beyond Universal Service: Characteristics of Americans Without Telephones, 1980-1993.Telecommunications Policy,19(6),477-485.
27. UNDP(2002).,未出版
28. USDA(2009).,未出版
29. USDA(2007).,未出版
30. Van Dijk, J.(1999).The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
31. 教育部(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。臺北:教育部。
32. 聯合行銷研究股份有限公司(2010)。,臺北:研究發展考核委員會。
33. 聯合行銷研究股份有限公司(2006)。,臺北:研究發展考核委員會。