次級房貸事件對生態基金績效影響

Ecology Funds Investment Performance on Subprime Mortgage

10.29895/ATFSAS.201403_7(1).0002

彭開琼(Kai-Chiung Peng)；張佳雯(Chia-Wen Chang)；朱陳秀芳(Hsiu-Fang Chu Chen)

生態基金 ； 風險值 ； 次級房貸事件 ； Ecology funds ； value at risk ； subprime mortgage

新竹教育大學人文社會學報

7卷1期（2014 / 03 / 31）

33 - 56

繁體中文

本文選取全球著名生態基金共9檔，並以次級房貸事件為時間切割點，第一期為次級房貸期間，擷取時間為2008年1月1日至2009年2月27日止，第二期為後次級房貸期間，擷取時間2009年3月2日至2011年12月31日止。利用基金報酬率、標準差、夏普指數等比較其投資績效，並以風險值分析，探討金融危機對於生態基金的影響。因此，本文有三項研究目的，首先評估生態基金之績效表現，其次以風險值評估各檔基金風險程度，最後探討次級房貸事件對於生態基金之影響性。研究結果發現，次級房貸期間獲利情形較後次級房貸期間低，而風險波動性也較大，因此，顯示次級房貸期間之生態基金的績效表現依然受到次級房貸事件的影響。

This research is focused on nine Ecology funds from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2011. The duration is divided into two periods. The first period begins from January 1, 2008 to February 27, 2009. The second periods begins from March 2, 2009 to December 31, 2011.We use of the fund rate of return, standard deviation, BETA CAPM, Sharpe ratio to compare their investment performance, and the absolute risk value - the relative risk values, historical simulation, Monte Carlo France are estimated to investigate the risk value of the Fund.In light of these concerns, this article has three purposes:(a) to assess the ecological performance of the Fund; (b) to analysis the ecological fund value at risk for explore various fund the level of risk; and (c) to investigate before and after Ecology funds investment performance on Subprime mortgage.The results show that the profit situation in the subprime mortgage is displayed over subprime mortgages to low volatility risk also larger display subprime mortgage ecological performance of the fund, are still subject to the impact of the subprime events.

1. 林灼榮、徐啟升(2010)。臺灣共同基金績效持續性之檢定：多構面績效指標之比較。管理與系統，17(1)，27-47。
   連結：
2. 時報資訊公司（2010）。情報贏家資料庫。臺北市：作者。
3. 臺灣經濟新報（TEJ）（2011）。臺灣經濟新報資料庫。臺北市：作者。
4. Alexander, G. J.,Baptista, A. M.(2003).Portfolio performance evaluation using value at risk.Journal of Portfolio Management,29(4),93-102.
5. Brightman, J. S.,Haslanger, B. L.(1980).Past investment performance: Seductive but deceptive.Journal of Portfolio Management,6(2),43-45.
6. Brown, S. J.,Goetzmann, W. N.(1995).Performance persistence.Journal of Finance,50(2),679-698.
7. Brueckner, J. K.,Paul, S. C.,Leonard, I. N.(2012).Subprime mortgages and the housing bubble.Journal of Urban Economics,71,230-243.
8. Christoffersen, S. E. K.,Sarkissian, S.(2009).City size and fund performance.Journal of Financial Economics,92(2),252-275.
9. Christopher, L. F.,Kristopher, G.,Lorenz, G.,Paul, S. W.(2008).Just the facts: An initial analysis of subprime's role in the housing crisis.Journal of Housing Economics,17(4),291-305.
10. Demyanyk, Y.,Van Hemert, O.(2011).Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis.Review of Financial Studies,24(6),1848-1880.
11. Engle, J.,Gizycki, M.(1999).,Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
12. Gourieroux, C.,Laurent, J. P.,Scaillet, O.(2000).Sensitivity analysis of values at risk.Journal of Empirical Finance,7(3),225-245.
13. Gourieroux, C.,Liu, W.(2012).Converting Tail-VaR to VaR: An econometric study.Journal of Financial Econometrics,10(2),233-264.
14. Jan, Y. C.,Hung, M. W.(2004).Short-run and long-run persistence in mutual funds.Journal of Investing,13(1),67-71.
15. Jorion, P.(2000).Value at risk: The new benchmark for controlling market risk.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
16. Kjeldsen, S.(2000).Financing of environmental protection in Russia: The role of charges.Post-Soviet Geography and Economics,41(1),48-62.
17. Matallin-Saez, J. C.,Soler-Dominguez, A.,Tortosa-Ausina, E.(2012).Mutual fund performance: Banking versus independent managers.Applied Economics Letters,19(8),755-758.
18. Mattila, T.(2012).Any sustainable decoupling in the Finnish economy? A comparison of the pathways and sensitivities of GDP and ecological footprint 2002-2005.Ecological Indicators,16,128-134.
19. Ze-To, S. Y. M.(2012).Estimating value-at-risk under a Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework with jump.Applied Economics,44(21),2729-2741.
20. 李秀娟(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，中原大學。
21. 盧昭彰、林國欽、郭怡婷(2009)。臺灣歷年溫差變化趨勢及其原因探討─以 1954 至 2003 年為例。環境與生態學報，2(1)，15-32。