题名

臺灣農會信用部生產結構與成本效率之歷年趨勢分析

并列篇名

The Evolution of the Production Structure and Cost Efficiency of Taiwan's Farmers' Credit Unions

DOI

10.29895/ATFSAS.201403_7(1).0004

作者

陳柏琪(Po-Chi Chen)

关键词

資料包絡分析法 ; 成本效率 ; 共同邊界 ; 農會信用部 ; Data Envelopment Analysis ; cost efficiency ; Metafrontier ; Farmers' Credit Unions

期刊名称

新竹教育大學人文社會學報

卷期/出版年月

7卷1期(2014 / 03 / 31)

页次

95 - 128

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文採用資料包絡分析法,以共同邊界(Metafrontier)概念來評估233家農會信用部於農業金融法實施前後之2001年至2009年的成本效率,並將其分解為分配效率、純技術效率與規模效率,以探討農業金融法實施的效果,以及信用部經營無效率的來源。效率評估結果顯示,共同邊界所得之平均成本效率值為0.696,顯示信用部具有節省30.4%成本的空間來生產其原有的產出。其中,投入配置分配效率可藉由進一步提高每員工吸收資金金額,以及降低每員工使用資本數量來改善;而技術效率中,純技術效率之改善又比規模效率來得重要。統計檢定則顯示「農業金融法」之實施,確實使得信用部績效較實施前為高,惟其所帶來助益很快就被全球經濟不景氣所抵銷,顯示經濟景氣對於信用部經營的重要性。

英文摘要

This paper adopts the Metafrontier Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to investigate the impact of agricultural financial reform on the cost efficiencies of Taiwan's Farmers' Credit Unions (FCUs) by using panel data over the period 2001-2009. The cost efficiencies are further decomposed into allocation efficiencies, pure technical efficiencies and scale efficiencies to uncover the source of inefficiency of FCUs.Empirical results show that the cost efficiency of FCUs can be improved by 30.4% on average, in which the increase of the fund intensity and the decrease of the capital intensity are helpful for the enhancement of allocative efficiency and the improvement of pure technical efficiency is more important than that of scale efficiency. Statistical tests indicate that the FCUs positively reacted to the financial reform. However, its positive effects were offset very quickly by the economic recession resulted from the financial crisis in 2008 and shows that the economic condition is important for the operation of FCUs.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王克陸、彭雅惠(2004)。應用隨機前緣成本法於臺灣農會信用部之效率評估研究。臺灣管理學刊,4(1),43-58。
    連結:
  2. 莊忠柱、吳振國(2006)。臺灣區農會信用部經營效率評估:非意欲因素資料包絡分析法的應用。東吳經濟商學學報,52,125。
    連結:
  3. 陳永琦、傅祖壇(2004)。臺灣地區農會信用部合併之成本節省效益分析。農業經濟叢刊,9(2),1-26。
    連結:
  4. 陳柏琪、張靜貞、游明敏、徐世勳(2009)。臺灣地區農會經營績效之評估─多部門資料包絡法之應用。經濟論文叢刊,37(4),415-453。
    連結:
  5. 劉春初(2002)。臺灣地區農會信用部風險管理與效率評估之研究。農業經濟半年刊,71,2-18。
    連結:
  6. 盧永祥(2008)。臺灣地區農會信用部風險態度、生產力及成本結構之研究。農業經濟叢刊,14(1),1-37。
    連結:
  7. 顏晃平、張靜文、吳榮杰(2008)。臺灣農會信用部成本效率之研究─共同邊界函數之應用。應用經濟論叢,84,159-193。
    連結:
  8. 顏晃平、張靜文、吳榮杰(2011)。臺灣農會信用部成本效率與結構之衡量─不同技術水準間群組比較。農業經濟叢刊,17(1),41-75。
    連結:
  9. Aspinwall, R.(Ed.),Eisenbeis, R.(Ed.)(1985).Handbook for Banking Strategy.New York‚NY:Wiley.
  10. Battese, G. E.,Rao, D. S. P.(2002).Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function.International Journal of Business and Economics,1(2),87-93.
  11. Brissimis, S. N.,Delis, M. D.,Tsionas, E. G.(2010).Technical and allocative efficiency in European banking.European Journal of Operational Research,204,153-163.
  12. Chang, C.-C.(1999).The nonparametric risk-adjusted efficiency measurement: an application to Taiwan's major rural financial intermediaries.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81,902-913.
  13. Chen, P. C.,Yu, M. M.,Chang, C. C.,Hsu, S. H.(2007).Productivity change in Taiwan's farmers' credit unions: A nonparametric risk-adjusted malmquist approach.Agricultural Economics,36,219-229.
  14. Choi, O.,Stefanou, S. E.,Stokes, J. R.(2007).Efficiency differences of U.S. agricultural banks.Agricultural Finance Review,67(1),55-73.
  15. Coelli, T.,Prasada Rao, D. S.,Battese, G. E.(2005).An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis.Boston‚MA:Kluwer.
  16. Das, A.,Ghosh, S.(2006).Financial deregulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of Indian banks during the post reform period.Review of Financial Economics,15,193-221.
  17. Färe, R.,Grosskopf, S.,Lovell, C. A. K.(1985).The measurement of efficiency of production.Boston‚MA:Kluwer.
  18. Färe, R.,Grsskopf, S.,Weber, W. L.(2004).The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking.Applied Economics,36,1731-1743.
  19. Farrell, M. J.(1957).The measurement of productive efficiency.Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, series A,129,253-351.
  20. Fukuyama, H.,Weber, W. L.(2009).Output slacks-adjusted cost efficiency and value-based technical efficiency in DEA models.Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan,52,86-104.
  21. Gilbert, R. A.,Wilson, P. W.(1998).Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks.Journal of Economics and Business,50,133-155.
  22. Hsiao, H. C.,Chang, H.,Cianci, A. M.,Huang, L. H.(2010).First financial restructuring and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks.Journal of Banking & Finance,34,1461-1471.
  23. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A.,Margaritis, D.,Staikouras, C.(2009).Efficiency and productivity growth in the banking industry of Central and Eastern Europe.Journal of Banking & Finance,33,557-567.
  24. Kumbhakar, S. C.,Tsionas, E.G.(2005).Measuring technical and allocative inefficiency in the translog cost system: A Bayesian approach.Journal of Econometrics,126,355-384.
  25. Leightner, J. E.,Lovell, C. A. K.(1998).The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks.Journal of Economics and Business,50,115-131.
  26. Mukherjee, K.,Ray, S. C.,Miller, S. M.(2001).Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience.Journal of Banking & Finance,25,913-939.
  27. O'Donnell, C. J.,Prasada Rao, D. S.,Battese, G. E.(2008).Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios.Empirical Economics,34,231-255.
  28. Park, K. H.,Weber, W. L.(2006).A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean banking industry, 1992-2002.Journal of Banking & Finance,30,2371-2386.
  29. Rao, D. S. P.,O'Donnell, C. J.,Battese, G. E.(2003).CEPA Working Paper, No. 01/2003CEPA Working Paper, No. 01/2003,Australia:Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, School of Economics, University of Queensland.
  30. Settlage, D. M.,Preckel, P. V.,Settlage, L. A.(2009).Risk-adjusted efficiency and risk aversion in the agricultural banking industry.Agricultural Finance Review,69(3),314-329.
  31. Sturm, J. E.,Williams, B.(2004).Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience.Journal of Banking and Finance,28,1775-1799.
  32. Sueyoshi, T.,Hasebe, T.,Ito, F.,Sakai, J.,Ozawa, W.(1998).DEA-bilateral performance comparison: An application to Japan Agricultural Co-operatives (Nokyo).Omega,26(2),233-248.
  33. Wheelock, D. C.,Wilson, P. W.(1999).Technical progress, inefficiency, and productivity change in U.S. banking.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,31(2),211-234.
  34. Xiong, X.,Tian, J.,Ruan, H.(2011).A DEA-model evaluation of the efficiency of peasant household credit investigation system in rural credit cooperatives: A positive research in Hubei Province, China.China Agricultural Economic Review,3(1),54-66.
  35. 吳明哲(2003)。臺灣地區農會信用部經營效率之評估。產業金融季刊,119,41-62。
  36. 李青萍(2000)。影響農會信用部經營績效之因素與擠兌前後經營績效變化之研究。農業金融論叢,44,49-93。
  37. 李鍵欣、吳榮杰、顏晃平(2009)。應用共同邊界模型探討農會信用部生產效率之研究。臺灣銀行季刊,60(4),79-94。
  38. 林明萩(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市,中華大學。
  39. 張嘉玲(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。宜蘭縣,佛光大學。
  40. 梁榮輝、廖振盛(2007)。臺灣地區農會信用部經營績效之研究─農業金融改革前後之比較。金融風險管理季刊,3(2),85-104。
  41. 黃吉成(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。宜蘭縣,佛光大學。
  42. 黃錦儀(2007)。政策性農業專案貸款執行之探討。農政與農情,177,44-47。
  43. 臺灣省農會(2001)。臺灣地區各級農會年報。臺北市:作者。
  44. 盧永祥(2005)。臺灣地區農會信用部經營效率之分析─三階段 DEA模型之應用。臺灣銀行季刊,56(3),174-193。
  45. 盧永祥(2010)。臺灣農會信用部之效率與生產力分析─應用一般性共同邊界 Malmquist 生產力指數。2010 年農業經濟學會研討會,臺北市:
  46. 戴淑惠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣,中原大學。
  47. 簡明哲、陳鈺琪(2005)。臺灣基層農會信用部之經營績效分析:金融重建基金設置前後之比較。存款保險資訊季刊,18(2),55-74。
被引用次数
  1. 李貞宜(2017)。雙北市基層農會信用部經營績效之分析。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2017。1-42。